Protein conformational diversity modulates sequence divergence

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 79-87

  Juritz, Ezequiel ^a   Palopoli, Nicolas ^a   Fornasari, Maria Silvina ^a   Fernandez Alberti, Sebastian ^a   Parisi, Gustavo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE QUILMES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

conformational diversity; native state; protein evolution; sequence divergence

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIGANDS; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871839239     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss080     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abhiman S, Sonnhammer EL. 2005. FunShift: a database of function shift analysis on protein subfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:D197-D200.
2. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 19:716-723.
3. Bashton M, Nobeli I, Thornton JM. 2008. PROCOGNATE: a cognate ligand domain mapping for enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: D618-D622.
4. Bastolla U, Roman HE, VendruscoloM. 1999. Neutral evolution of model proteins: diffusion in sequence space and overdispersion. J Theor Biol. 200:49-64.
5. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
6. Berrera M, Molinari H, Fogolari F. 2003. Amino acid empirical contact energy definitions for fold recognition in the space of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 4:8.
7. Best RB, Lindorff-Larsen K, DePristo MA, Vendruscolo M. 2006. Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:10901-10906.
8. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO. 2006. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 23: 1751-1761.
9. Boehr DD, McElheny D, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. 2006. The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 313: 1638-1642.
10. Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. 1995. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 21:167-195.
11. Bryngelson JD,Wolynes PG. 1989. Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model (with applications to protein folding). J Phys Chem. 93:6902-6915.
12. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2003. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Burra PV, Zhang Y, Godzik A, Stec B. 2009. Global distribution of conformational states derived from redundant models in the PDB points to non-uniqueness of the protein structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:10505-10510.
14. Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823-826.
15. Dokholyan NV, Shakhnovich EI. 2001. Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles. J Mol Biol. 312:289-307.
16. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:14338-14343.
17. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352.
18. Eisenberg D, Bowie JU, Luthy R, Choe S. 1992. Three-dimensional profiles for analysing protein sequence-structure relationships. Faraday Discuss. 93:25-34.
19. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
20. Felsenstein J. 1989. PHYLIP-phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164-166.
21. Ferrada E, Melo F. 2009. Effective knowledge-based potentials. Protein Sci. 18:1469-1485.
22. Ferreiro DU, Hegler JA, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. 2007. Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:19819-19824.
23. Fischer E. 1894. Einfluss der Configuration auf die wirkung der Enzyme. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 27:2985-2993.
24. Foote J, Milstein C. 1994. Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:10370-10374.
25. Fornasari MS, Parisi G, Echave J. 2002. Site-specific amino acid replacement matrices from structurally constrained protein evolution simulations. Mol Biol Evol. 19:352-356.
26. Fornasari MS, Parisi G, Echave J. 2007. Quaternary structure constraints on evolutionary sequence divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 24:349-351.
27. Friedland GD, Lakomek NA, Griesinger C,Meiler J, Kortemme T. 2009. A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family. PLoS Comput Biol. 5:e1000393.
28. Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, et al. (14 co-authors). 2007. The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels giveamore comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D291-D297.
29. Gribskov M, Homyak M, Edenfield J, Eisenberg D. 1988. Profile scanning for three-dimensional structural patterns in protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 4:61-66.
30. Gribskov M, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. 1987. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 84:4355-4358.
31. Gutteridge A, Thornton J. 2005. Conformational changes observed in enzyme crystal structures upon substrate binding. J Mol Biol. 346: 21-28.
32. Guzzo AV. 1965. The influence of amino-acid sequence on protein structure. Biophys J. 5:809-822.
33. Hannenhalli SS, Russell RB. 2000. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments. J Mol Biol. 303:61-76.
34. Henzler-Wildman KA, Thai V, Lei M, et al. (12 co-authors). 2007. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature 450: 838-844.
35. Hilser VJ. 2010. Biochemistry. An ensemble view of allostery. Science 327: 653-654.
36. James LC, Tawfik DS. 2003. Conformational diversity and protein evolution-a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem Sci. 28: 361-368.
37. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 8: 275-282.
38. Juritz J, Fernandez-Alberti S, Parisi G. 2011. PCDB: a database of proteins with conformational diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(1 suppl): D475-D479.
39. Kantrowitz ER, Lipscomb WN. 1990. Escherichia coli aspartate transcarbamoylase: the molecular basis for a concerted allosteric transition. Trends Biochem Sci. 15:53-59.
40. Karplus K, Sjolander K, Barrett C, Cline M, Haussler D, Hughey R, Holm L, Sander C. 1997. Predicting protein structure using hidden Markov models. Proteins (Suppl 1), 134-139.
41. Karplus M, Kuriyan J. 2005. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:6679-6685.
42. Karush F. 1950. Heterogeneity of the binding sites of bovine serum albumin. J Am Chem Soc. 72:2705-2713.
43. Keskin O, Jernigan RL, Bahar I. 2000. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. Biophys J. 78:2093-2106.
44. Kleinman CL, Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2010. Statistical potentials for improved structurally constrained evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1546-1560.
45. Kondrashov DA, Zhang W, Aranda R, Stec B, Phillips GN Jr. 2008. Sampling of the native conformational ensemble of myoglobin via structures in different crystalline environments. Proteins 70: 353-362.
46. Koshi JM, Goldstein RA. 1995. Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 8:641-645.
47. Koshland DE Jr, Ray WJ Jr, Erwin MJ. 1958. Protein structure and enzyme action. Fed Proc. 17:1145-1150.
48. Krogh A, Brown M, Mian IS, Sjolander K, Haussler D. 1994. Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling. J Mol Biol. 235:1501-1531.
49. Kumar S, Ma B, Tsai CJ, Sinha N, Nussinov R. 2000. Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci. 9: 10-19.
50. Lange OF, Lakomek NA, Fares C, Schroder GF, Walter KF, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmuller H, Griesinger C, de Groot BL. 2008. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320:1471-1475.
51. Le SQ, Gascuel O. 2008. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1307-1320.
52. Lesk AM, Chothia C. 1980. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J Mol Biol. 136:225-270.
53. Levitt M. 1978. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry 17:4277-4285.
54. Luthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. 1992. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356:83-85.
55. Luthy R, McLachlan AD, Eisenberg D. 1991. Secondary structure-based profiles: use of structure-conserving scoring tables in searching protein sequence databases for structural similarities. Proteins 10: 229-239.
56. Ma B, Shatsky M,Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. 2002. Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations. Protein Sci. 11:184-197.
57. Maguid S, Fernandez-Alberti S, Echave J. 2008. Evolutionary conservation of protein vibrational dynamics. Gene 422:7-13.
58. Maguid S, Fernandez-Alberti S, Ferrelli L, Echave J. 2005. Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. Biophys J. 89:3-13.
59. Maguid S, Fernandez-Alberti S, Parisi G, Echave J. 2006. Evolutionary conservation of protein backbone flexibility. J Mol Evol. 63:448-457.
60. Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux JP. 1965. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol. 12:88-118.
61. Monsellier E, Chiti F. 2007. Prevention of amyloid-like aggregation as a driving force of protein evolution. EMBO Rep. 8:737-742.
62. Nienhaus GU, Muller JD, McMahon BH, Frauenfelder H. 1997. Exploring the conformational energy landscape of proteins. Physica D 107: 297-311.
63. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O. 2002. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci. 11:2606-2621.
64. Overington J. 1992. Structural constraints on residue substitution. Genet Eng (N Y). 14:231-249.
65. Overington J, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL. 1990. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 241: 132-145.
66. Parisi G, Echave J. 2001. Structural constraints and emergence of sequence patterns in protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 18:750-756.
67. Parisi G, Echave J. 2004. The structurally constrained protein evolution model accounts for sequence patterns of the LbetaH superfamily. BMC Evol Biol. 4:41.
68. Parisi G, Echave J. 2005. Generality of the structurally constrained protein evolution model: assessment on representatives of the four main fold classes. Gene 345:45-53.
69. Pond SL, Frost SD, Muse SV. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21:676-679.
70. Sander C, Schneider R. 1993. The HSSP database of protein structuresequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3105-3109.
71. Schneider A, Cannarozzi GM, Gonnet GH. 2005. Empirical codon substitution matrix. BMC Bioinformatics 6:134.
72. Sinha N, Nussinov R. 2001. Point mutations and sequence variability in proteins: redistributions of preexisting populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:3139-3144.
73. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. 2009. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324:203-207.
74. Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Ma B, Nussinov R. 1999. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci. 8:1181-1190.
75. Tsai CJ, Ma B, Nussinov R. 1999. Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:9970-9972.
76. Velyvis A, Yang YR, Schachman HK, Kay LE. 2007. A solution NMR study showing that active site ligands and nucleotides directly perturb the allosteric equilibriumin aspartate transcarbamoylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:8815-8820.
77. Volkman BF, Lipson D, Wemmer DE, Kern D. 2001. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 291: 2429-2433.
78. Whelan S, Goldman N. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 18:691-699.
79. Wolf YI, Gopich IV, Lipman DJ, Koonin EV. 2010. Relative contributions of intrinsic structural-functional constraints and translation rate to the evolution of protein-coding genes. Genome Biol Evol. 2:190-199.
80. Zhuravlev PI, Papoian GA. 2010. Protein functional landscapes, dynamics, allostery: a tortuous path towards a universal theoretical framework. Q Rev Biophys. 43:295-332.
81. Zoete V, Michielin O, Karplus M. 2002. Relation between sequence and structure of HIV-1 protease inhibitor complexes: a model system for the analysis of protein flexibility. J Mol Biol. 315:21-52.