Continuous glucose monitoring sensors: Past, present and future algorithmic challenges

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Facchinetti, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Calibration; Diabetes; Filtering; Model identification; Prediction; Signal processing

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS; CALIBRATION; CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS; FILTRATION; FORECASTING; GLUCOSE SENSORS; INSULIN; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PROCESSING; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; ATTENUATION METHOD; CLINICAL PRACTICES; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING SENSORS; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSEMONITORING (CGM); GLUCOSE CONCENTRATION; MODEL IDENTIFICATION; SELF-MONITORING BLOOD GLUCOSE;

GLUCOSE;

ALGORITHM; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DEVICES; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; SOFTWARE; TRENDS;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85016153689     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s16122093     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Gross, T.M.; Bode, B.W.; Einhorn, D.; Kayne, D.M.; Reed, J.H.; White, N.H.; Mastrototaro, J.J. Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2000, 2, 49–56.
2. Feldman, B.; Brazg, R.; Schwartz, S.; Weinstein, R. A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology—Results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2003, 5, 769–779.
3. Bode, B.; Gross, K.; Rikalo, N.; Schwartz, S.; Wahl, T.; Page, C.; Gross, T.; Mastrototaro, J. Alarms based on real-time sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo- and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous monitoring system. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2004, 6, 105–113.
4. Bailey, T.; Zisser, H.; Chang, A. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2009, 11, 749–755.
5. Christiansen, M.; Bailey, T.; Watkins, E.; Liljenquist, D.; Price, D.; Nakamura, K.; Boock, R.; Peyser, T. A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: Improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2013, 15, 881–888.
6. Dexcom G5 Mobile. Available online: https://www.dexcom.com/g5-mobile-cgm (accessed on 23 June 2016).
7. Mastrototaro, J.; Shin, J.; Marcus, A.; Sulur, G.; Abelseth, J.; Bode, B.W.; Buckingham, B.A.; Hirsch, I.B.; Kaufman, F.R.; Schwartz, S.L.; et al. The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2008, 10, 385–390.
8. Tamborlane, W.V.; Beck, R.W.; Bode, B.W.; Buckingham, B.; Chase, H.P.; Clemons, R.; Fiallo-Scharer, R.; Fox, L.A.; Gilliam, L.K.; Hirsch, I.B.; et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1464–1476.
9. Zhao, C.; Dassau, E.; Jovanovi, L.; Zisser, H.C.; Doyle, F.J.; Seborg, D.E. Predicting subcutaneous glucose concentration using a latent-variable-based statistical method for type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 617–633.
10. Turksoy, K.; Bayrak, E.S.; Quinn, L.; Littlejohn, E.; Rollins, D.; Cinar, A. Hypoglycemia Early Alarm Systems Based On Multivariable Models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 12329–12336.
11. Zarkogianni, K.; Mitsis, K.; Litsa, E.; Arredondo, M.T.; Fico, G.; Fioravanti, A.; Nikita, K.S. Comparative assessment of glucose prediction models for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus applying sensors for glucose and physical activity monitoring. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2015, 53, 1333–1343.
12. Zhao, C.; Yu, C. Rapid model identification for online subcutaneous glucose concentration prediction for new subjects with type I diabetes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62, 1333–1344.
13. Zecchin, C.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. How Much Is Short-Term Glucose Prediction in Type 1 Diabetes Improved by Adding Insulin Delivery and Meal Content Information to CGM Data? A Proof-of-Concept Study. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 1149–1160.
14. Hughes, C.S.; Patek, S.D.; Breton, M.D.; Kovatchev, B.P. Hypoglycemia prevention via pump attenuation and red-yellow-green “traffic” lights using continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump data. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2010, 4, 1146–1155.
15. Cameron, F.; Wilson, D.M.; Buckingham, B.A.; Arzumanyan, H.; Clinton, P.; Chase, H.P.; Lum, J.; Maahs, D.M.; Calhoun, P.M.; Bequette, B.W. Inpatient studies of a Kalman-filter-based predictive pump shutoff algorithm. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 1142–1147.
16. Weiss, R.; Garg, S.K.; Bergenstal, R.M.; Klonoff, D.C.; Bode, B.W.; Bailey, T.S.; Thrasher, J.; Schwartz, F.; Welsh, J.B.; Kaufman, F.R.; et al. Predictors of Hypoglycemia in the ASPIRE In-Home Study and Effects of Automatic Suspension of Insulin Delivery. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 1016–1020.
17. Herrero, P.; Calm, R.; Vehi, J.; Armengol, J.; Georgiou, P.; Oliver, N.; Tomazou, C. Robust fault detection system for insulin pump therapy using continuous glucose monitoring. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 1131–1141.
18. Facchinetti, A.; Del Favero, S.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. An online failure detection method of the glucose sensor-insulin pump system: Improved overnight safety of type-1 diabetic subjects. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60, 406–416.
19. Baysal, N.; Cameron, F.; Buckingham, B.A.; Wilson, D.M.; Chase, H.P.; Maahs, D.M.; Bequette, B.W.; Buckingham, B.A.; Wilson, D.M.; Aye, T.; et al. A novel method to detect pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISA) in an artificial pancreas. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014, 8, 1091–1096.
20. Turksoy, K.; Roy, A.; Cinar, A. Real-Time Model-Based Fault Detection of Continuous Glucose Sensor Measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, doi:10.1109/TBME.2016.2535412.
21. Cescon, M.; DeSalvo, D.J.; Ly, T.T.; Maahs, D.M.; Messer, L.H.; Buckingham, B.A.; Doyle, F.J.; Dassau, E. Early Detection of Infusion Set Failure During Insulin Pump Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, 10, 1268–1276.
22. Bequette, B.W. Challenges and Recent Progress in the Development of a Closed-loop Artificial Pancreas. Annu. Rev. Control. 2012, 36, 255–266.
23. Peyser, T.; Dassau, E.; Breton, M.; Skyler, J.S. The artificial pancreas: Current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1311, 102–123.
24. Cobelli, C.; Renard, E.; Kovatchev, B. The artificial pancreas: A digital-age treatment for diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 679–681.
25. Thabit, H.; Hovorka, R. Coming of age: The artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2016, 59, 1795–1805.
26. Sparacino, G.; Facchinetti, A.; Cobelli, C. “Smart” continuous glucose monitoring sensors: On-line signal processing issues. Sensors 2010, 10, 6751–6772.
27. Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Guerra, S.; Luijf, Y.M.; DeVries, J.H.; Mader, J.K.; Ellmerer, M.; Benesch, C.; Heinemann, L.; Bruttomesso, D.; et al. Real-time improvement of continuous glucose monitoring accuracy: the smart sensor concept. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 793–800.
28. Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Signal processing algorithms implementing the “smart sensor” concept to improve continuous glucose monitoring in diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 1308–1318.
29. Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. An online self-tunable method to denoise CGM sensor data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57, 634–641.
30. Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Online denoising method to handle intraindividual variability of signal-to-noise ratio in continuous glucose monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 58, 2664–2671.
31. Chase, J.G.; Hann, C.E.; Jackson, M.; Lin, J.; Lotz, T.; Wong, X.W.; Shaw, G.M. Integral-based filtering of continuous glucose sensor measurements for glycaemic control in critical care. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2006, 82, 238–247.
32. Palerm, C.C.; Bequette, B.W. Hypoglycemia detection and prediction using continuous glucose monitoring-a study on hypoglycemic clamp data. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2007, 1, 624–629.
33. Kuure-Kinsey, M.; Palerm, C.C.; Bequette, B.W. A dual-rate Kalman filter for continuous glucose monitoring. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2006, 1, 63–66.
34. Mahmoudi, Z.; Dencker Johansen, M.; Christiansen, J.S.; Hejlesen, O.K. A multistep algorithm for processing and calibration of microdialysis continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2013, 15, 825–835.
35. Guerra, S.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Nicolao, G.D.; Cobelli, C. Enhancing the accuracy of subcutaneous glucose sensors: A real-time deconvolution-based approach. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 59, 1658–1669.
36. Vettoretti, M.; Facchinetti, A.; Del Favero, S.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. On-line calibration of glucose sensors from the measured current by a time-varying calibration function and Bayesian priors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 63, 1631–1641.
37. Barcelo-Rico, F.; Bondia, J.; Diez, J.L.; Rossetti, P. A multiple local models approach to accuracy improvement in continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012, 14, 74–82.
38. Barcelo-Rico, F.; Diez, J.L.; Rossetti, P.; Vehi, J.; Bondia, J. Adaptive calibration algorithm for plasma glucose estimation in continuous glucose monitoring. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2013, 17, 530–538.
39. Kirchsteiger, H.; Zaccarian, L.; Renard, E.; del Re, L. LMI-Based Approaches for the Calibration of Continuous Glucose Measurement Sensors. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2015, 19, 1697–1706.
40. Sparacino, G.; Zanderigo, F.; Corazza, S.; Maran, A.; Facchinetti, A.; Cobelli, C. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 54, 931–937.
41. Zecchin, C.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Jump neural network for online short-time prediction of blood glucose from continuous monitoring sensors and meal information. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2014, 113, 144–152.
42. Georga, E.I.; Protopappas, V.C.; Ardigo, D.; Marina, M.; Zavaroni, I.; Polyzos, D.; Fotiadis, D.I. Multivariate prediction of subcutaneous glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes patients based on support vector regression. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2013, 17, 71–81.
43. Georga, E.I.; Protopappas, V.C.; Polyzos, D.; Fotiadis, D.I. Evaluation of short-term predictors of glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes combining feature ranking with regression models. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2015, 53, 1305–1318.
44. Garcia, A.; Rack-Gomer, A.L.; Bhavaraju, N.C.; Hampapuram, H.; Kamath, A.; Peyser, T.; Facchinetti, A.; Zecchin, C.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Dexcom G4AP: An advanced continuous glucose monitor for the artificial pancreas. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2013, 7, 1436–1445.
45. Bailey, T.S.; Chang, A.; Christiansen, M. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 209–214.
46. Castle, J.R.; Jacobs, P.G. Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Treatment Decisions. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, doi:10.1177/1932296816631569.
47. Kovatchev, B.P.; Patek, S.D.; Ortiz, E.A.; Breton, M.D. Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015, 17, 177–186.
48. Patek, S.D.; Lv, D.; Ortiz, E.A.; Hughes-Karvetski, C.; Kulkarni, S.; Zhang, Q.; Breton, M.D. Empirical Representation of Blood Glucose Variability in a Compartmental Model. In Prediction Methods for Blood Glucose Concentration: Design, Use and Evaluation; Kirchsteiger, H., Jørgensen, B.J., Renard, E., del Re, L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 133–157.
49. Viceconti, M.; Cobelli, C.; Haddad, T.; Kovatchev, B.; Palmer, M. In silico assessment of biomedical products: The conundrum of rare but not so rare events. J. Eng. Med. 2016, submitted.
50. Vettoretti, M.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Predicting insulin treatment scenarios with the net effect method: Domain of validity. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016, 18, 694–704.
51. Vettoretti, M.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Patient decision-making of CGM sensor driven insulin therapies in type 1 diabetes: In silico assessment. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2015, 2015, 2363–2366.
52. Kovatchev, B.P.; Breton, M.; Man, C.D.; Cobelli, C. In silico preclinical trials: A proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2009, 3, 44–55.
53. Man, C.D.; Micheletto, F.; Lv, D.; Breton, M.; Kovatchev, B.; Cobelli, C. The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014, 8, 26–34.
54. Visentin, R.; Dalla Man, C.; Kudva, Y.C.; Basu, A.; Cobelli, C. Circadian variability of insulin sensitivity: Physiological input for in silico artificial pancreas. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015, 17, 1–7.
55. Visentin, R.; Man, C.; Cobelli, C. One-Day Bayesian Cloning of Type 1 Diabetes Subjects: Towards a Single-Day UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2016, 63, 2416–2424.
56. Vettoretti, M.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Accuracy of devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose: A stochastic error model. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2015, 2015, 2359–2362.
57. Facchinetti, A.; Del Favero, S.; Sparacino, G.; Castle, J.R.; Ward, W.K.; Cobelli, C. Modeling the glucose sensor error. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 61, 620–629.
58. Facchinetti, A.; Del Favero, S.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Model of glucose sensor error components: Identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2015, 53, 1259–1269.
59. Facchinetti, A.; Del Favero, S.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. Modeling Transient Disconnections and Compression Artifacts of Continuous Glucose Sensors. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016, 18, 264–272.
60. FDA Advisory Panel Votes to Recommend Non-Adjunctive Use of Dexcom G5 Mobile CGM. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016, 18, 512–516.
61. Edelman, S.V. Regulation Catches Up to Reality: Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2016, doi:10.1177/1932296816667749.
62. Bailey, T.; Bode, B.W.; Christiansen, M.P.; Klaff, L.J.; Alva, S. The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015, 17, 787–794.
63. Bolinder, J.; Antuna, R.; Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, P.; Kroger, J.; Weitgasser, R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 388, 2254–2263.
64. Acciaroli, G.; Vettoretti, M.; Facchinetti, A.; Sparacino, G.; Cobelli, C. From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2016, 18, 472–479.
65. Bequette, B.W. Fault detection and safety in closed-loop artificial pancreas systems. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2014, 8, 1204–1214.