Fault detection and safety in closed-loop artificial pancreas systems

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1204-1214

  Bequette, B Wayne ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Artificial pancreas; Fault detection; Infusion set failure; Safety; Sensor anomaly

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CHEMICAL REACTION; CLOSED LOOP ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITOR SENSOR; DEVICE FAILURE; DEVICE SAFETY; EXERCISE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HYDRODEALKYLATION; INFUSION PUMP; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN INFUSION; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; REMOTE SENSING; SENSOR; STRESS; HUMAN;

EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; PANCREAS, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84940937352     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814543661     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baysal N, Cameron F, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Bequette BW. Detecting sensor and insulin infusion set anomalies in an artificial pancreas. In: Proceedings of the 2013 American Control Conference. Washington, DC; 2013:2935-2939.
2. Bequette BW. Process Control. Modeling, Design and Simulation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
3. Industrial process control. Available at: http://www.tb-cconsoles.com/Industries.html. Accessed March 22, 2014.
4. Boeing 787 schematic diagram. Available at: http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b787/b787-schem-02.gif. Assessed March 22, 2014.
5. Plane crash information. Available at: http://www.plane-crashinfo.com.
6. Wheeler TJ, Seiler P, Packard AK, Balas GK. Performance analysis of fault detection systems based on analytically redundant linear time-invariant dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference. San Francisco, CA; 2011:214-219.
7. Frank PM. Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy-a survey and some new results. Automatica. 1990;26(3):459-474.
8. Isermann R. Model-based fault-detection and diagnosis-status and applications. Annu Rev Control. 2005;29:71-85.
9. Venkatasubramanian V. Systemic failures: challenges and opportunities in risk management in complex systems. AIChE J. 2011;57(1):2-9.
10. Leveson NG. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Safety Sci. 2004;42:237-270.
11. Leveson NG, Stephanopoulos G. A system-theoretic, control- inspired view and approach to process safety. AIChE J. 2014;60(1):2-14.
12. Shivers JP, Mackowiak L, Anhalt H, Zisser H. "Turn it off!": diabetes device alarm fatigue considerations for the present and the future. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(3):789-794.
13. Laberge JC, Bullemer P, Tolsma M, Vernon D, Resising C. Addressing alarm flood situations in the process industries through alarm summary display design and alarm response strategy. Int J Ind Ergonomics. 2014;44:395-406.
14. Heinemann L, Krinelke L. Insulin infusion set: the Achilles heel of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(4):954-964.
15. Cope JU, Morrison AE, Samuels-Reid J. Adolescent use of insulin and patient-controlled analgesia pump technology: a 10-year FDA retrospective study of adverse events. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5);e1133-e1138.
16. Guilhem I, Leguerrier AM, Lecordier F, Poirier JY, Maugendre D. Technical risks with subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:279-284.
17. Patel PJ, Benasi K, Ferrari G, et al. Randomized trial of infusion set function: steel versus Teflon. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(1):15-19.
18. Heinemann L, Walsh J, Roberts R. We need more research and better designs for insulin infusion sets. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(4):199-202.
19. Vega-Hernandez O, Campos-Cornejo F, Campos-Delgado DU, Espinoza-Trejo DR. Increasing security in an artificial páncreas: diagnosis of actuator faults. In: 2009 Pan American Health Care Exchanges (PACHE). Mexico City, Mexico; 2009:137-142.
20. Hovorka R, Canonico V, Chassin LJ, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Physiol Meas. 2004;25:905-920.
21. Vega-Hernandez O, Campos-Delgado DU, Espinoza-Trejo DR. Actuator fault tolerant control for an artificial pancreas. In: 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control. Toluca, Mexico; 2009:1-6.
22. Rojas R, Garcia-Gabin W, Bequette BW. Mean glucose slope-principal component analysis classification to detect insulin infusion set failure. In: Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress. Milan; 2011:14127-14132.
23. Cameron F, Bequette BW, Wilson DW, Buckingham BA. Detecting insulin infusion set failure. Paper presented at: Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; 2012; Barcelona, Spain.
24. Cameron F, Buckingham BA, Wilson DM, Bequette BW. Extending threshold based detection of infusion set failures. Paper presented at: Diabetes Technology Meeting; 2012; Bethesda, MD.
25. Herrero P, Calm R, Veh J, et al. Robust fault detection system for insulin pump therapy using continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1131-1141.
26. Helton KL, Ratner BD, Wisniewski NA. Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):632-646.
27. Helton KL, Ratner BD, Wisniewski NA. Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response- part ii: examples and application. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(3):647-656.
28. Mensh BD, Wisniewski NA, Neil BM, Burnett DR. Susceptibility of interstitial continuous glucose monitor performance to sleeping position. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):863-870.
29. Baysal N, Cameron F, Buckingham BA, et al. A novel method to detect pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISA) in an artificial pancreas. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014.
30. Bequette BW. Challenges and progress in the development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas. Annu Rev Control. 2012;36:255-266.
31. Revert A, Garelli F, Pico J, et al. Safety auxiliary feedback element for the artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(8):2113-2122.
32. Schaeffer NE. The role of human factors in the design and development of an insulin pump. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(2):260-264.
33. Finan DA, Zisser H, Jovanovič L, Bevier WC, Seborg DE. Automatic detection of stress states in type 1 diabetes subjects in ambulatory conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49(17): 7843-7848.
34. Facchinetti A, del Favero S, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. An online failure detection method of the glucose sensor-insulin pump system: improved overnight safety of type-1 diabetic subjects. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60(2):406-416.
35. del Favero S, Monaro M, Facchinetti A, Tagliavini A, Sparacino G, Cobelli C. Real-time detection of glucose sensor and insulin pump faults in an artificial pancreas. Paper presented at: International Federation of Automatic Control World Congress; 2014; South Africa.
36. Buckingham BA. Clinical overview of continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(2):300-306.
37. Welsh JB, Vargas S, Williams G, Moberg S. Designing the modern pump: engineering aspects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion software. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(S1):S37-S42.
38. Picton PE, Yeung M, Hamming N, Desborough L, Dassau E, Cafazzo JA. Advancement of the artificial pancreas through the development of interoperability standards. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):1066-1070.
39. Lacey S. How GE's industrial internet is reshaping thermal power generation. Greentech Media; July 16, 2013. Available at: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/How-GEs- Industrial-Internet-is-Reshaping-Thermal-Power-Generation. Accessed March 13, 2014.
40. Maggiore JB, Kinney DS. Monitoring real-time environmental performance. Aero Q. 2009;3:22-25. Available at: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr-03-09/pdfs/AERO-Q309-article07.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2014. Brochure providing overview of the system available at: http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/aviationservices/brochures/Airplane-Health-Management.pdf.
41. Place J, Robert A, Ben Brahim N, et al. DiAs web monitoring: a real-time remote monitoring system designed for artificial pancreas outpatient trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(6): 1427-1435.
42. Kovatchev BP, Renard E, Cobelli C, et al. Feasibility of outpatient fully integrated closed-loop control: first studies of wearable artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1851-1858.
43. Lanzola G, Scarpellini S, Di Palma F, et al. Monitoring artificial pancreas trials through agent-based technologies: a case report. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(2):216-224.
44. Atlas E. Do we need a remote monitoring system in the product? Paper presented at: CONS 7th ATTD; February 2014; Vienna.
45. Danne T. Do we need a remote monitoring system in the product? Paper presented at: PRO 7th ATTD; February 2014; Vienna.
46. Keith-Hynes P, Guerlain S, Mize B, et al. DiAs user interface: a patient-centric interface for mobile artificial pancreas systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(6):1416-1426.
47. Dassau E, Jovanovic L, Doyle FJ III, Zisser HC. Enhanced 911/global position system wizard: a telemedicine application for the prevention of severe hypoglycemia-monitor, alert, and locate. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(6):1501-1506.
48. Harvey RA, Dassau E, Zisser H, Seborg DE, Jovanovic L, Doyle FJ III. Design of the health monitoring system for the artificial pancreas: low glucose prediction module. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(6):1345-1354.
49. Fischer MJ. Union Carbide's Bhopal incident: a retrospective. J Risk Uncertainty. 1996;12:257-269.
50. CSB report on Texas City explosion. U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Investigation report: refinery explosion and fire, BP Texas City, Texas. Report no. 2005- 04-I-TX. March 2007. Available at: http://www.csb.gov/assets/1/19/csbfinalreportbp.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2014.
51. NTSB. Aircraft accident report loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson River, US Airways flight 1549, Airbus A320-214, N106US, Weehawken, New Jersey, January 15, 2009 NTSB number AAR-10/03 NTIS number PB2010-910403 Available at: http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2010/hudson-river-ny/. Accessed March 13, 2014.
52. Skylibrary. Aircraft certification for bird strike risk (2014). Available at: http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Aircraft- Certification-for-Bird-Strike-Risk. Accessed March 17, 2014.
53. BEA report. Safety investigation following the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A300-203, flight AF 447. Available at: http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol.af.447/note05juillet- 2012.en.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.
54. Wise J. What really happened aboard Air France 447. Available at: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/-aviation/crashes/what-really-happened-aboard-air-france- 447-6611877-2. Accessed March 16, 2014.
55. Peterson B. What we have learned so far from the Asiana flight 214 investigation. Popular Mechanics. 2013. Available at: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/aviation/-crashes/what-weve-learned-so-far-from-the-asiana-flight- 214-investigation-16264162.