From two to one per day calibration of Dexcom G4 platinum by a time-varying day-specific Bayesian prior

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 472-479

  Acciaroli, Giada ^a   Vettoretti, Martina ^a   Facchinetti, Andrea ^a   Sparacino, Giovanni ^a   Cobelli, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN CALIBRATION ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME; ANALYSIS; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN INFUSION;

GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CALIBRATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84983041362     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2016.0088     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. JDRF Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group: The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2009 32 1378-1383.
2. Pickup JC, Holloway MF, Samsi K. Real-Time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a qualitative framework analysis of patient narratives. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 544-550.
3. De Salvo D, Buckingham B. Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions. Curr Diab Rep 2013; 13: 657-662.
4. Mauras N, Fox L, Englert K, Beck RW. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Endocrine 2013; 43: 41-50.
5. Mitre TM, Legault L, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Haidar A. Analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data to assess outpatient closed-loop studies: considerations for different sensors. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16: 326-327.
6. Battelino T, Phillip M, Bratina N, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 795-800.
7. McGarraugh G, Bergenstal R. Detection of hypoglycemia with continuous interstitial and traditional blood glucose monitoring using the FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 145-150.
8. Turksoy K, Bayrak ES, Quinn L, et al. Multivariable adaptive closed-loop control of an artificial pancreas without meal and activity announcement. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15: 386-400.
9. Rossetti P, Bondia J, Vehí J, Fanelli CG. Estimating plasma glucose from interstitial glucose: the issue of calibration algorithms in commercial continuous glucose monitoring devices. Sensors 2010; 10: 10936-10952.
10. Bequette BW. Continuous glucose monitoring: real-Time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010; 4: 404-418.
11. Helton KL, Ratner BD, Wisniewski NA. Biomechanics of the sensor-Tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I. theoretical framework. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 632-646.
12. Klueh U, Liu Z, Feldman B, et al. Metabolic biofouling of glucose sensors in vivo: role of tissue microhemorrhages. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 583-595.
13. DirecNet Study Group: Evaluation of factors affecting CGMS calibration Diabetes Technol Ther 2006 8 318-325.
14. Magni P, Sparacino G. Parameter estimation. In. Carson E, Cobelli C, eds. Modeling Methodology for Physiology and Medicine (2nd edition). Oxford: Elsevier, 2013.
15. Vettoretti M, Facchinetti A, Del Favero S, et al. On-line calibration of glucose sensors from the measured current by a time-varying calibration function and Bayesian priors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2015. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2426217.
16. Acciaroli G, Vettoretti M, Facchinetti A, et al. Glucose sensors for diabetes management: no need of 24h warm-up time by use of Bayes estimation. Proc 37th Annual InterNational Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2015, August 25-29.
17. Christiansen M, Bailey T, Watkins E, et al. A newgeneration continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2013; 15: 881-888.
18. Schiavon M, Dalla Man C, Dube S, et al. Modeling plasma-To-interstitium glucose kinetics from multitracer plasma and microdialysis data. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015; 17: 825-831.
19. Sparacino G, Facchinetti A, Cobelli C: Smart continuous glucose monitoring sensors: on-line signal processing issues Sensors 2010 10 6751-6772.
20. Oppenheim AV. Linear time-invariant systems. In. Oppenheim AV, Willsky, AS, Nawab SH (editors). Signals and Systems (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River Prentice-Hall, 1997; pp 75-178.
21. Wentholt IME, Hart AAM, Hoekstra JBL, Devries JH. How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors? Diabetes Technol Ther 2008 10 57-68.
22. Garcia A, Rack-Gomer AL, Bhavaraju NC, et al. G4AP: an advanced continuous glucose monitor for the artificial pancreas. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013; 7: 1436-1445.
23. Bailey TS, Chang A, Christiansen M. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015; 9: 209-214.
24. Bailey T, Zisser H, Chang A. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 749-755.
25. Clarke WL. The original Clarke error grid analysis (EGA).Diabetes Technol Ther 2005 7 776-777.