Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 209-214

  Bailey, Timothy S ^a   Chang, Anna ^b   Christiansen, Mark ^c  

^a AMCR Institute   (United States)

^b John Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center   (United States)

^c Diablo Clinical Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced algorithm; Clinical accuracy; Continuous glucose monitoring

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; INSULIN; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; SKIN IRRITATION; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938562819     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296814559746     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mazze RS, Strock E, Borgman S, Wesley D, Stout P, Racchini J. evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): is CGM ready for real time? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(1):11-18.
2. Wentholt IME, Hart AAM, Hoekstra JBL, Devries JH. How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10(2):57-68.
3. Hermanides J, Phillip M, DeVries JH. Current application of continuous glucose monitoring in the treatment of diabetes pros and cons. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(suppl 2):S197-S201.
4. Bay C, Kristensen PL, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Tarnow L, Thorsteinsson B. Nocturnal continuous glucose monitoring: accuracy and reliability of hypoglycemia detection in patients with type 1 diabetes at high risk of severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(5):371-377.
5. Secher AL, Madsen AB, Ringholm L, et al. Patient satisfaction and barriers to initiating real-time continuous glucose monitoring in early pregnancy in women with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2012;29:272-277.
6. Ramchandani N, Arya S, Ten S, Bhandari S. Real-life utilization of real-time continuous glucose monitoring: the complete picture. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(4):860-870.
7. Christiansen M, Bailey T, Watkins E, et al. A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;5(10):1-8.
8. Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, et al. Performance evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system under conditions similar to daily life. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):833-841.
9. Damiano ER, McKeon K, El-Khatib FH, Zheng H, Nathan DM, Russell SJ. A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors: the Navigator, G4 Platinum, and Enlite [published online ahead of print April 21, 2014]. J Diabetes Sci Technol.
10. Kropff J, Bruttomesso D, Doll W, et al. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions [published online ahead of print August 11, 2014]. Diabetes Obes Metab.
11. Matuleviciene V, Joseph J, Andelin M, Hirsch IB, Attvall S, Pivodic A. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 Sensor (Dexcom G4 System) and Enlite Sensor (Guardian REAL-Time System) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(11):1-9.
12. Garcia A, Rack-Gomer AL, Bhavaraju NC, et al. Dexcom G4AP: an advanced continuous glucose monitor for the artificial pancreas. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:1436-1445.
13. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:622-628.
14. Kovatchev BP, Shields D, Breton M. Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:1-5.
15. Brauker JH, Edelman SV. The function of continuous glucose sensors. Review of Endocrinology, 2007; May 20-22.
16. Pettus J, Price D, Hill K, Edelman S. How people use direction and rate of change information provided by real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) to adjust insulin dosing. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014:16(S1):198 (A-76).
17. Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Bowman F, Price DA. The subjective experience of CGM-RT use: comparing current users with ex-users. Paper presented at: 71st American Diabetes Association meeting; 2012; San Diego, CA.
18. Bailey TS, Ahmann A, Brazg R, et al. Accuracy and acceptability of the 6-day Enlite continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(5):1-7.
19. Tack C, Pohlmeir H, Behnke T, et al. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(4):330-337.
20. Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(5):1060-1075.
21. Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Parkin CG. Performance variability of seven commonly used self-monitoring of blood glucose systems: clinical considerations for patients and providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):144-152.
22. Kuo CY, Hsu CT, Ho CS, Su TE, Wu MH, Wang CJ. Accuracy and precision evaluation of seven selfmonitoring blood glucose systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(5):596-600.
23. Shivers JP, Mackowiak L, Anhalt H, Zisser H. "Turn it off!": diabetes device alarm fatigue considerations for the present and the future. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7:789-794.
24. Lutz Heinemann L. (Analytical) accuracy of blood glucose meters and patients: how do they come together? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(1):1-3.