Modeling transient disconnections and compression artifacts of continuous glucose sensors

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 264-272

  Facchinetti, Andrea ^a   Del Favero, Simone ^a   Sparacino, Giovanni ^a   Cobelli, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; COMPRESSION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; LINEAR SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARKOV CHAIN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICE FAILURE; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA COMPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84964253561     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: 15578593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2015.0250     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bailey TS, Chang A, Christiansen M. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9: 209-214.
2. Agrawal P, Zhong A, Welsh JB, et al. Retrospective analysis of the real-world use of the threshold suspend feature of sensor-Augmented insulin pumps. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 316-319.
3. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al. Thresholdbased insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 224-232.
4. Cobelli C, Renard E, Kovatchev B. Artificial pancreas: past, present, future. Diabetes. 2011; 60: 2672-2682.
5. Peyser T, Dassau E, Breton M, et al. The artificial pancreas: current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014; 1311: 102-123.
6. Breton M, Kovatchev B. Analysis, modeling, and simulation of the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008; 2: 853-862.
7. Lunn DJ, Wei C, Hovorka R. Fitting dynamic models with forcing functions: application to continuous glucose monitoring in insulin therapy. Stat Med. 2011; 30: 2234-2250.
8. Facchinetti A, Del Favero S, Sparacino G, et al. Modeling the glucose sensor error. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014; 61: 620-629.
9. Facchinetti A, Del Favero S, Sparacino G, et al. Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2014; 53: 1259-1269.
10. Schiavon M, Dalla Man C, Dube S, et al. Modeling plasmato-interstitium glucose kinetics from multitracer plasma and microdialysis data. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 825-831.
11. Facchinetti A, Del Favero S, Sparacino G, et al. An online failure detection method of the glucose sensor-insulin pump system: improved overnight safety of type-1 diabetic subjects. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60: 406-416.
12. Baysal N, CameronF, BuckinghamBA, et al.: Anovelmethod to detect pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISA) in an artificial pancreas. JDiabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8: 1091-1096.
13. Emami A, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Haidar A. Enhancing glucose sensor models: modeling the drop-outs. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 420-426.
14. Kovatchev BP, Breton M, Man CD, et al. In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 3: 44-55.
15. Dalla Man C, Micheletto F, Lv D, et al. The UVA/Padova type 1 diabetes simulator: new features. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8: 26-34.
16. Soru P, Nicolao GD, Toffanin C, et al. MPC based artificial pancreas: strategies for individualization and meal compensation. Annu Rev Control. 2012; 36: 118-128.
17. Wilinska ME, Blaha J, Chassin LJ, et al. Evaluating glycemic control algorithms by computer simulations. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011; 13: 713-722.
18. Doyle FJ, Huyett LM, Lee JB, et al. Closed-loop artificial pancreas systems: engineering the algorithms. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37: 1191-1197.
19. Herrero P, Calm R, Vehi J, et al. Robust fault detection system for insulin pump therapy using continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6: 1131-1141.
20. Christiansen M, Bailey T, Watkins E, et al A newgeneration continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013; 15: 881-888.
21. Guerra S, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, et al. Enhancing the accuracy of subcutaneous glucose sensors: a real-Time deconvolution-based approach. IEEETransBiomedEng. 2012; 59: 1658-1669.
22. Del Favero S, Facchinetti A, Sparacino G, et al. Improving accuracy and precision of glucose sensor profiles: retrospective fitting by constrained deconvolution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014; 61: 1044-1053.
23. Castle JR, WardWK: Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 4: 221-225.
24. Castle JR, Pitts A, Hanavan K, et al. The accuracy benefit of multiple amperometric glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 706-710.