Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1308-1338

  Ben Menahem, Shiko M ^a   Von Krogh, Georg ^a   Erden, Zeynep ^a   Schneider, Andreas ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b The Development of New Drug Delivery Devices and Digital Business Models at Ypsomed   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983341710     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.1214     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (131)

1. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61-89.
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 634-665.
3. Argote, L. 1982. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 420-434.
4. Argote, L., Turner, M. E., & Fichman, M. 1989. To centralize or not to centralize: The effects of uncertainty and threat on group structure and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43: 58-74.
5. Aven, T. 2011. On different types of uncertainties in the context of the precautionary principle. Risk Analysis, 31: 1515-1525.
6. Baumeister, R. F., & Masicampo, E. J. 2010. Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animalculture interface. Psychological Review, 117: 945-971.
7. Bechky, B. A. 2006. Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17: 3-21.
8. Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. 2011. Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 239-261.
9. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. 1992. The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 1137-1160.
10. Bigley, G. A., &Roberts, K. H. 2001. The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1281-1299.
11. Booth, B., Glassman, R., & Ma, P. 2003. Oncology's trials. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 2: 609-610.
12. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 795-817.
13. Bresman, H. 2013. Changing routines: A process model of vicarious group learning in pharmaceutical R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 35-61.
14. Bresman, H., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. 2013. The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24: 1120-1139.
15. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2: 40-57.
16. Bruns, H. C. 2013. Working alone together: Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 62-83.
17. Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. 2010. Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why "bureaucratic" teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21: 609-624.
18. Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. London, UK: Tavistock.
19. Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. 2004. Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: The dynamics of fit. NewYork, NY: Springer.
20. Cardinal, L. B. 2001. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12: 19-36.
21. Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., &Long, C. P. 2004. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15: 411-431.
22. Cardinal, L. B., Turner, S. F., Fern, M. J., & Burton, R. M. 2011. Organizing for product development across technological environments: Performance trade-offs and priorities. Organization Science, 22: 1000-1025.
23. Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13: 442-455.
24. Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, andtransforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15: 555-568.
25. Child, J., & McGrath, R. G. 2001. Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information intensive economy. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1135-1148.
26. Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. 2007. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 48: 1107-1123.
27. Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. 2011. Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 571-612.
28. Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. 2009. Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 413-452.
29. De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. 2000. Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing account of integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79: 975-987.
30. De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. 2008. Motivated information processing in group judgement and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12: 22-49.
31. Donaldson, L. 2001. The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3: 179-202.
33. Dougherty, D., & Dunne, D. D. 2012. Digital science and knowledge boundaries in complex innovation. Organization Science, 23: 1467-1484.
34. Drews, J. 2000. Drug discovery: A historical perspective. Science, 287: 1960-1964.
35. Eder, J., Sedrani, R., &Wiesmann, C. 2014. The discovery of first-in-class drugs: Origins and evolution. National Review, 13: 577-587.
36. Edmondson, A. C. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
37. Edmondson, A. C. 2003. Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1420-1452.
38. Edwards, A. M., Isserlin, R., Bader, G. D., Frye, S. V., Willson, T. M., & Yu, F. H. 2011. Too many roads not taken. Nature, 470: 163-165.
39. Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46: 1554-1568.
40. Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. 2006. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52: 1155-1169.
41. Fleming, L. 2004. Perfecting cross-pollination. Harvard Business Review, 82: 22-24.
42. Galbraith, J. R. 1973. Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Galbraith, J. R. 1977. Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44. Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. 2012. Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 998-1022.
45. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. 2012. Seeking qualitative rigor ininductive research:NotesontheGioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 15-31.
46. Gittell, J. H. 2002. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48: 1408-1426.
47. Grandori, A. 2010. A rational heuristic model of economic decision making. Rationalityand Society, 22: 477-504.
48. Grandori, A., & Soda, G. 2006. A relational approach to organisation design. Industry and Innovation, 13: 151-172.
49. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122.
50. Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. 2009. Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20: 422-440.
51. Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17: 484-500.
52. Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. 2001. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12: 435-449.
53. Hollenbeck, J. R., Beersma, B., & Schouten, M. 2012. Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Academy of Management Review, 37: 82-106.
54. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ellis, A. P. J., Humphrey, S. E., Garza, A., & Ilgen, D. R. 2011. Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114: 64-74.
55. Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2: 88-115.
56. Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. 2009. Teamlevel predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensivemeta-analysis spanning three decades of research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1128-1145.
57. Jelinek, M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1990. The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
58. Jones, B. F. 2009. The burden of knowledge and the "death of renaissanceman": Is innovation getting harder?The Review of Economic Studies, 76: 283-317.
59. Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. A. 2006. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17: 22-44.
60. Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. 2010. Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4: 317-357.
61. Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. 2006. Dynamic delegation: Hierarchical, shared and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51: 590-621.
62. Knudsen, T., & Srikanth, K. 2014. Coordinated exploration organizing joint search by multiple specialists to overcome mutual confusion and joint myopia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 409-441.
63. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
64. Kotha, R., George, G., & Srikanth, K. 2013. Bridging the mutual knowledge gap: Coordination and the commercialization of university science. Academy ofManagement Journal, 56: 498-524.
65. Kruglanski, A. W. 1989. Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Springer.
66. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. 1996. Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing". Psychological Review, 103: 263-283.
67. Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167-195.
68. Langfred, C. W. 2007. The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in selfmanaging teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 885-900.
69. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. 1967. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 1-47.
71. Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. 1999. Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979-1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 161-187.
72. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125: 255-275.
73. Liebeskind, J. P. 1996. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 93-107.
74. Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Hollingshead, A. B. 2007. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18: 147-161.
75. Majchrzak, A., More, P. H. B., & Faraj, S. 2012. Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organization Science, 23: 951-970.
76. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
77. Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A. W. 1987. What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 162-183.
78. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. 1978. Identities and interactions. New York, NY: Free Press.
79. McEvily, B., Soda, G., & Tortoriello, M. 2014. More formally: Rediscovering the missing link between formal organization and informal social structure. The Academy ofManagement Annals, 8: 299-345.
80. Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. 2014. The catalyst effect: The impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1154-1173.
81. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. S., Mathews, J. A., Miles, G., & Coleman, H. J., Jr. 1997. Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 11: 7-20.
83. Miller, C. C., Cardinal, L. B., & Glick, W. H. 1997. Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 189-204.
84. Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., West, B., Ellis, A. P. J., & Porter, C. O. L. H. 2004. Asymmetric adaptability:Dynamic teamstructures as one-way streets. AcademyofManagement Journal, 47: 681-695.
85. Munos, B. 2009. Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 8: 959-968.
86. Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2007. The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 821-847.
87. Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5: 14-37.
88. Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. 2009. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20: 635-652.
89. Northrup, J. 2005. The pharmaceutical sector. In L. R. Burns (Ed.), The business of healthcare innovation: 27-102. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
90. Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. 2009. Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. The Academy of Management Annals, 3: 463-502.
91. Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11: 404-428.
92. Orlikowski, W. J. 2008. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. In M. S. Ackerman, C. A. Halverson, T. Erickson, & W. A. Kellogg (Eds.), Resources, coevolution and artifacts: 255-305. London, UK: Springer.
93. Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11: 538-550.
94. Pammolli, F., Magazzini, L., & Riccaboni, M. 2011. The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 10: 428-438.
95. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96. Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., & Schacht, A. L. 2010. How to improve R&D productivity: The pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 9: 203-214.
97. Pavitt, K. 1999. Technology, management and systems of innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
98. Pennings, J. M. 1992. Structural contingency theory: A reappraisal. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 14: 267-309. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
99. Perrow, C. 1967. Aframework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32: 194-208.
100. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2000. The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
101. Pinto, M. B., Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. 1993. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science, 39: 1281-1297.
102. Puranam, P., Alexy, O., & Reitzig, M. 2014. What's "new" about new forms of organizing? Academy of Management Review, 39: 162-180.
103. Puranam, P., &Raveendran, M. 2013. Interdependence and organization design. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Handbook of economic organization: 193-209. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
104. Puranam, P., Raveendran, M., & Knudsen, T. 2012. Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Academy ofManagement Review, 37: 419-440.
105. Puranam, P., & Swamy, M. 2011. Expedition without maps: Why faulty initial representations may be useful in joint discovery problems. Working Paper, London Business School, London.
106. Ringel, M., Tollman, P., Hersch, G., & Schulze, U. 2013. Does size matter in R&D productivity? If not, what does? Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 12: 901-902.
107. Rishton, G. M. 2005. Failure and success in modern drug discovery: Guiding principles in the establishment of high probability of success drug discovery organizations. Medicinal Chemistry (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates), 1: 519-527.
108. Sams-Dodd, F. 2005. Target-based drug discovery: Is something wrong? Drug Discovery Today, 10: 139-147.
109. Schippers, M., Edmondson, A. C., & West, M. A. 2014. Team reflexivity as an antidote to team informationprocessing failures. Small Group Research, 45: 731-769.
110. Scott, W. R. 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
111. Sherman, J. D., &Keller, R. T. 2011. Suboptimal assessment of interunit task interdependence: Modes of integration and information processing for coordination performance. Organization Science, 22: 245-261.
112. Siggelkow, N. 2002. Evolution towards fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 125-159.
113. Singh, J., & Fleming, L. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56: 41-56.
114. Sitkin, S. B., Cardinal, L. B., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M. (Eds.) 2010. Organizational control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
115. Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. 2012. A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management Journal, 33: 751-771.
116. Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. 2011. Integrating distributed work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 849-875.
117. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
118. Stryker, S. 1980. Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
119. Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
120. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 675-735.
121. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., &McGarty, C. 1994. Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 454-463.
122. Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. 1978. Information processing as an integrative concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3: 613-624.
123. Tyre, M. J., & von Hippel, E. 1997. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8: 71-83.
124. Valentine, M. A., & Edmondson, A. C. 2015. Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organization Science, 26: 405-422.
125. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. 2016. Identifying viable "need-solution pairs": Problem solving without problem formulation. Organization Science, 27: 207-221.
126. von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36: 649-676.
127. vonKrogh, G., Nonaka, I., &Rechsteiner, L. 2012. Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: A review and framework. Journal ofManagement Studies, 49: 240-277.
128. Vural, O. M., Dahlander, L., & George, G. 2013. Collaborative benefits and coordination costs: Learning and capability development in science. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7: 122-137.
129. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. 1993. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357-381.
130. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316: 1036-1039.
131. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.