Accounting for the effects of accountability

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 255-275

  Lerner, Jennifer S ^a   Tetlock, Philip E ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN;

ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS;

EID: 0033089176     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255     Document Type: Review

References (189)

1. Adelberg, S., & Batson, C. D. (1978). Accountability and helping: When needs exceed resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 343-350.
2. Anderson, P. A. (1981). Justifications and precedents as constraints in foreign policy decision-making. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 738-761.
3. Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349-356.
4. Arkes, H., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 125-140.
5. Arkes, H. R. (1991). Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486-498.
6. Ashton, R. H. (1992). Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 292-306.
7. Baer, R., Hinkle, S., Smith, K., & Fenton, M. (1980). Reactance as a function of actual versus projected autonomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 416-422.
8. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. F. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
9. Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychological Association: Distinguished Scientific Award for the Applications of Psychology Address. American Psychologist, 45, 494-503.
10. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1993). Emotions, arousal, and stereotypic judgments: A heuristic model of affect and stereotyping. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 13-37). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621-632.
12. Boudreau, L. A., Baron, R. M., & Oliver, P. V. (1992). Effects of expected communication target expertise and timing of set on trait use in person description. Personality and Social Psychologv Bulletin, 18, 447-451.
13. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56-71.
14. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
15. Brief, A. P., Dukerich, J. M., & Doran, L. I. (1991). Resolving ethical dilemmas in management: Experimental investigations of values, accountability, and choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 380-396.
16. Brockner, J., Rubin, J. Z., & Lang, E. (1981). Face-saving and entrapment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 68-79.
17. Brockner, J., Shaw, M. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1979). Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 492-503.
18. Buchman, T. A., Tetlock, P. E., & Reed, R. O. (1996). Accountability and auditors' judgment about contingent events. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23, 379-398.
19. Carnevale, P. J. D., Pruitt, D. G., & Britton, S. D. (1979). Looking tough: The negotiator under constituent surveillance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 118-121.
20. Carnevale, P. J. D., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. D. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
21. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
22. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), (in press). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
23. Chen, S., Shecter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy-versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262-275.
24. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
25. Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., & Evenbeck, S. (1973). Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 100-108.
26. Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., Kozlowski, I. T., & Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 663-672.
27. Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-417). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Conlon, E. J., & Wolf, G. (1980). The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 172-192.
29. Cooley, C. H. (1922). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
30. Cornett, L. M., & Gaines, G. (1997). Accountability in the 1990s: Holding schools responsible for student achievement (ED406739). Atlanla, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
31. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
32. Cronshaw, S. F., & Alexander, R. A. (1985). One answer to the demand for accountability: Selection utility as an investment decision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 102-118.
33. Cuccia, A. D., Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1995). The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting. Accounting Review, 70, 227-248.
34. Curley, S. P., Yates, J. F., & Abrams, R. A. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 230-256.
35. Cvetkovich, G. (1978). Cognitive accommodation, language, and social responsibility. Social Psychology, 2, 149-155.
36. Dawes, R. M., & Mulford, M. (1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 201-211.
37. Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10.
38. Doney, P. M., & Armstrong, G. M. (1996). Effects of accountability on symbolic information search and information analysis by organizational buyers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 57-65.
39. Dulany, D. E., & Hilton, D. J. (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition, 9, 85-110.
40. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
41. Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1996). What is accountability in health care? Annals Of Internal Medicine, 124, 229-239.
42. Enzle, M. E., & Anderson, S. C. (1993). Surveillant intentions and intrinsic-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 257-266.
43. Fairchild, T., & Zins, J. (1992). Accountability practices of school psychologists - 1991 national survey. School Psychology Review, 21, 617-627.
44. Fandt, P. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 140-158.
45. Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46. Fischhoff, B., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). Focusing techniques: A shortcut to improving probability judgments? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 175-194.
47. Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877-889.
48. Fitzpatrick, A. R., & Eagly, A. H. (1981). Anticipatory belief polarization as a function of the expertise of a discussion partner. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 636-642.
49. Ford, J. K., & Weldon, E. (1981). Forewarning and accountability: Effects on memory-based interpersonal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 264-268.
50. Fox, F. V., & Staw, B. M. (1979). The trapped administrator: The effects of job insecurity and policy resistance upon commitment to a course of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 449-471.
51. Geen, R. (1991). Social motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 377-399.
52. Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
53. Gordon, R. A., Rozelle, R. M., & Baxter, J. C. (1988). The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 20-33.
54. Gordon, R. A., & Stuecher, U. (1992). The effect of anonymity and increased accountability on the linguistic complexity of teaching evaluations. Journal of Psychology, 126, 639-649.
55. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, S: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
56. Guerin, B. (1989). Reducing evaluation effects in mere presence. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 183-190.
57. Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1996). Auditors incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. Accounting Review, 71, 43-59.
59. Hagafors, R., & Brehmer, B. (1983). Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 223-232.
60. Hammond, A. L. (1991). Calculating National Accountability For Climate Change. Environment, 33, 11.
61. Harkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
62. Hass, R. G., & Mann, R. W. (1976). Anticipatory belief change: Persuasion or impression management? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 105-111.
63. Hattrup, K., & Ford, J. K. (1995). The role of information characteristics and accountability in moderating stereotype-driven processes during social decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 1, 73-86.
64. Heilman, M. E., & Toffler, B. L. (1976). Reacting to reactance: An interpersonal interpretation of the need for freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 519-529.
65. Hendee, W. R. (1995). Accountability in the acquisition and use of medical technologies. International Journal of Technology Management, 10, 38-47.
66. Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
67. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
68. Innes, J. M., & Young, R. F. (1975). The effect of presence of an audience, evaluation apprehension and objective self-awareness on learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 35-42.
69. Institute for Scientific Information (1989-1998). Current contents database. Philadelphia: Author.
70. James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890).
71. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
72. Johnson, V. E., & Kaplan, S. E. (1991). Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, 96-107.
73. Jones, E. E., & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
74. Kahn, B. E., & Baron, J. (1995). An exploratory study of choice rules favored for high-stakes decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 305-328.
75. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
77. Kassin, S. M., Castillo, S. R., & Rigby, S. (1991). The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extensions of the retro-spective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 698-707.
78. Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 231-245.
79. Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J., & Kramer, G. P. (1996). Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 687-719.
80. Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
81. Kimble, C. E., & Rezabek, J. S. (1992). Playing games before an audience: Social facilitation or choking. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 115-120.
82. Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 194-208.
83. Koonce, L., Anderson, U., & Marchant, G. (1995). Justification of decisions in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 369-384.
84. Kroon, M. B. R., 't Hart, P., & Van Kreveld, D. (1991). Managing group decision making processes: Individual versus collective accountability and groupthink. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 91-115.
85. Kroon, M. B. R., Van Kreveld, D., & Rabbie, J. M. (1992). Group versus individual decision making: Effects of accountability and gender on groupthink. Small Group Research, 23, 427-458.
86. Krosnick, J. A., Li, F., & Lehman, D. R. (1990). Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1140-1152.
87. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
88. Lambert, A. J., Cronen, S., Chasteen, A. L., & Lickel, B. (1996). Private versus public expressions of racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 437-459.
89. Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 440-450.
90. Lerner, J. S. (1994). Accountability for allocation: Do one thing but say another. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
91. Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563-574.
92. Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Accountability and social cognition. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 3098-3121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
93. Levi, A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1980). A cognitive analysis of Japan's 1941 decision for war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 195-211.
94. Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-354). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
95. Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46-55.
96. Lord, A. T. (1992). Pressure: A methodological consideration for behavioral research in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall, 90-108.
97. Mano, H. (1992). Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 216-245.
98. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1995). Democratic governance. New York: Free Press.
99. Maslach, C., Santee, R. T., & Wade, C. (1987). Individuation, gender role, and dissent: Personality mediators of situational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1088-1093.
100. McAllister, D. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R., (1979). The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 228-244.
101. McFarland, C., Ross, M., & Conway, M. (1984). Self-persuasion and self-presentation as mediators of anticipatory attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 529-540.
102. McKenna, F. P., & Myers, L. B. (1997). Illusory self-assessments - Can they be reduced? British Journal of Psychology, 88, 39-51.
103. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
104. Mero, N., & Motowidlo, S. (1995). Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and favorability of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 517-524.
105. Miller, S. D. (1995). Teachers' responses to test-driven accountability pressures: "If I change, will my scores drop?". Reading Research & Instruction, 34, 332-351.
106. Morris, M., Moore, P. C., Tamuz, M., &Tarrell, R. (1998, August). Learning from a brush with danger. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.
107. Murphy, R. (1994). The effects of task characteristics on covariation assessment: The impact of accountability and judgment frame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 139-155.
108. Peecher, M. E., & Kleinmuntz, D. N. (1991). Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, 108-113.
109. Pelham, B. W., & Neter, E. (1995). The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 581-594.
110. Pendry, L. F., & Macrae, C. N. (1996). What the disinterested perceiver overlooks: Goal-directed social categorization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 249-256.
111. Pennington, J., & Schlenker, B. R. (in press). Accountability for consequential decisions: Justifying ethical judgments to audiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
112. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
113. Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 3, 503-513.
114. Price, K. H. (1987). Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 330-345.
115. Quigley, B. M., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Mediating effects of blame attributions on feelings of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1280-1288.
116. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994a). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
117. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994b). On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 511-524.
118. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distor-tions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174-221.
119. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
120. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
121. Sanna, L. J., Turley, K. J., & Mark, M. M. (1996). Expected evaluation, goals, and performance: Mood as input. Personality and Social Psycholyog Bulletin. 22, 323-335.
122. Sato, T. (1989). Accountability and the debt crisis. Futures, 21, 593-607.
123. Schadewald, M. S., & Limberg, S. T. (1992). Effect of information order and accountability on causal judgments in a legal context. Psychological Reports, 71, 619-625.
124. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
125. Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 194-248). New York: Academic Press. Schlenker, B. R. (Ed.). (1985). The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
126. Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Drigotas, S. M., Wieselquist, J., Pemberton, M. B., & Cox, C. (1995). The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 553-574.
127. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston.
128. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D., & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of irrelevant information. Social Cognition. 9, 67-84.
129. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
130. Selart, M. (1996). Structure compatibility and restructuring in judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 106-116.
131. Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1983). The accountability of conduct: A social psychological analysis. New York: Academic Press.
132. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
133. Sieber, J. E. (1974). Effects of decision importance on ability to generate warranted subjective uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 688-694.
134. Siegel-Jacobs, K., & Yates, J. F. (1996). Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1, 1-17.
135. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
136. Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. (1996, July). Reasons and evaluations: The components of accountability in decision making. In J. S. Lerner & P. E. Tetlock (Chairs), Accountability: The social context of cognition. Symposium conducted at the 8th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, San Francisco, CA.
137. Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. (1998). Constructive decision making in a social context: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
138. Simonson, I., & Nye, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 416-446.
139. Simonson, I., & Staw, B. M. (1992). Deescalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 419-426.
140. Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K., & Burdick, M. D. (1996, July). Accountability and automation bias. In J. S. Lerner & P. E. Tetlock (Chairs), Accountability: The social context of cognition. Symposium conducted at the 8th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, San Francisco, CA.
141. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
142. Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
143. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
144. Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy X Knowledge Accessibility Effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878-893.
145. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1980). Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 249-260.
146. Stenning, P. C. (Ed.). (1995). Accountability for criminal justice. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
147. Stone, D. N., & Ziebart, D. A. (1995). A model of financial incentive effects in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 250-261.
148. Streufert, S., & Streufert, S. C. (1978). Behavior in the complex environment. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston.
149. Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 311-378). New York: Random House.
150. Sutton, R. I., & Galunic, D. C. (1996). Consequences of public scrutiny for leaders and their organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 201-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
151. Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (1994). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. New York: Plenum.
152. Taylor, K. A. (1995). Testing credit and blame attributions as explanation for choices under ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 128-137.
153. Tesser, A. (1976). Attitude polarization as a function of thought and reality constraints. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 183-194.
154. Tetlock, P. E. (1980). Explaining teacher explanations of pupil performance: A self-presentation interpretation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 283-290.
155. Tetlock, P. E. (1983a). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83.
156. Tetlock, P. E. (1983b). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 285-292.
157. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
158. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
159. Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Losing our religion: On the collapse of precise normative standards in complex accountability systems. In R. Kramer & M. Neale (Eds.), Influence processes in organizations: Emerging themes in theory and research (pp. 121-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
160. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388-398.
161. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1994). Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 1-23.
162. Tetlock, P. E., & Kim J. I. (1987). Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-709.
163. Tetlock, P. E., & Lerner, J. S. (in press). The social contingency model of judgment and choice: Multi-functional but still dual-process? In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
164. Tetlock, P. E., Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 915-934.
165. Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1985). Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy? Psychological Review, 92, 59-77.
166. Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632-640.
167. Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.
168. Thompson, L. (1995). They saw a negotiation: Partisanship and involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 839-853.
169. Turner, R. G. (1977). Self-consciousness and anticipatory belief change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 438-441.
170. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
171. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology, (Vol. 6, pp. 49-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
172. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Extension versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgments. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
173. Tyler, T. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 1, 323-345.
174. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
175. Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.
176. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
177. Weigold, M. F., & Schlenker, B. R. (1991). Accountability and risk taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 25-29.
178. Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Chandler, C. (1982). Pity, anger, and guilt: An attributional analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 226-232.
179. Weldon, E., & Gargano, G. M. (1988). Cognitive loafing: The effects of accountability and shared responsibility on cognitive effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 159-171.
180. Wells, G. L., Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., Kagehiro, D., & Harvey, J. (1977). Anticipated discussion of interpretation eliminates actor-observer differences in the attribution of causality. Sociometry, 40, 247-253.
181. Williams, K., Harkins, S. G., & Latane, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
182. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
183. Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1996). Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 117-142.
184. Wilson, T. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Knowing what you'll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 21-35.
185. Wu, C. (1992). The effects of affective-cognitive consistency and anticipated self-presentation on the structure of attitudes. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 34, 29-40.
186. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-149.
187. Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 160-168.
188. Zanna, M., & Sande, G. (1987). The effects of collective actions on the attitudes of individual group members: A dissonance analysis. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 151-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
189. Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237-307.