More Formally: Rediscovering the Missing Link between Formal Organization and Informal Social Structure

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 299-345

  McEvily, Bill ^a   Soda, Giuseppe ^b   Tortoriello, Marco ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902820773     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2014.885252     Document Type: Article

References (175)

1. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. doi: 10.2307/2667105
2. Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434-448. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
3. Aldrich, H. (1976). Resource dependence and interorganizational relations local employment service offices and social services sector organizations. Administration & Society, 7(4), 419-454. doi: 10.1177/009539977600700402
4. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230.
5. Allen, T. J., & Cohen, S. I. (1969). Information flow in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12-19. doi: 10.2307/2391357
6. Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
7. Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573-1601. doi: 10.1177/0170840605054624
8. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108. doi: 10.2307/2392767
9. Barley, S. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61-103. doi: 10.2307/2393551
10. Barley, S. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 404-441. doi: 10.2307/2393937
11. Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76-95. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122
12. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381-398. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0891
15. Baum, J. A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
16. Baum, J. A., McEvily, B., & Rowley, T. J. (2012). Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organization Science, 23(2), 529-546. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0566
17. Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
18. Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
20. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375-395. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
21. Brass, D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 327-343. doi: 10.2307/256204
22. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817. doi: 10.2307/20159624
23. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Briscoe, F., & Tsai, W. (2011). Overcoming relational inertia how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 408-440. doi: 10.1177/0001839211432540
25. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
26. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365. doi: 10.2307/2393923
28. Burt, R. S. (2002). The social capital of structural holes. In M. F. Guillén (Ed.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field (pp. 148-190). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. doi: 10.1086/421787
30. Burt, R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119-148. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24162082
31. Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010). The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 543-676. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
32. Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824-844. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0350
33. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1177/003803857200600101
34. Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers' professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 436-452. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.32625956
35. Cobb, A. T. (1980). Informal influence in the formal organization: Perceived sources or power among work unit peers. Academy of Management Journal, 23(1), 155-161. doi: 10.2307/255503
36. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
37. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7(2), 119-135. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.2.119
38. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928-937. doi: 10.2307/20159632
39. Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40. Cummings, J. N., & Cross, R. (2003). Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks, 25(3), 197-210. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00049-7
41. Dahlander, L., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Ties that last tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 69-110. doi: 10.1177/0001839212474272
42. Dokko, G., Kane, A., & Tortoriello, M. (2013). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies. doi:10.1177/0170840613508397
43. Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2010). Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organization Science, 21(3), 677-695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0470
44. Donaldson, L. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation (Vol. 25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202. doi: 10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
46. Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 514-539. doi: 10.2307/2392695
47. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In C. W. Churchman & M. Verhulst (Eds.), Management sciences, models and techniques (Vol. 2, pp. 83-97). London: Pergamon Press.
48. Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181-201. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1999.9990219
49. Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035. doi: 10.1086/227352
50. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443-475.
51. Ford, R. C., & Randolph, W. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18(2), 267-294. doi: 10.1177/014920639201800204
52. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
53. Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28-36. doi: 10.1287/inte.4.3.28
54. Galunic, C., Ertug, G., & Gargiulo, M. (2012). The positive externalities of social capital: Benefiting from senior brokers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1213-1231. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0827
55. Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., & Galunic, C. (2009). The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 299-333. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.299
56. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360-1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
57. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510. doi: 10.1086/228311
58. Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 25-26). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
59. Greve, H. R., Mitsuhashi, H., & Baum, J. A. (2013). Greener pastures: Outside options and strategic alliance withdrawal. Organization Science, 24(1), 79-98. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0733
60. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 203-215.
61. Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422-440. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0421
62. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations (pp. 30-61). New York: Random House.
63. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111. doi: 10.2307/2667032
64. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232-248. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.232.2771
65. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776-793. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803922
66. Hargadon, A. B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 41-85. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24003-4
67. Ho, V. T., & Levesque, L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friends (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organization Science, 16(3), 275-289. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0121
68. Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.
69. Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303. doi: 10.2307/2393414
70. Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359-371.
71. Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2007). Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the "life of the party". Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558-585. doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.4.558
72. Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387-423. doi: 10.1086/316965
73. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and Fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
74. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002
75. Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. Harvard Business Review, 57(4), 65-75.
76. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
77. Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 317-357. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2010.494827
78. Kleinbaum, A. M. (2012). Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(3), 407-452. doi: 10.1177/0001839212461141
79. Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316-1336. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0804
80. Krackhardt, D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Computational Organization Theory, 89(112), 123-140.
81. Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks. Harvard Business Review, 71(1993), 104-111.
82. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123-140. doi: 10.2307/2786835
83. Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55-67. doi: 10.2307/256897
84. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1-47. doi: 10.2307/2391211
85. Lee, J. (2010). Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: Endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organization Science, 21(4), 804-822. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0488
86. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
87. Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519-1533. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
88. Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199. doi: 10.2307/2392493
89. Lomi, A., Lusher, D., Pattison, P. E., & Robins, G. (2013). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0850
90. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289-307. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436
91. Mahmood, I. P., Zhu, H., & Zajac, E. J. (2011). Where can capabilities come from? Network ties and capability acquisition in business groups. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 820-848. doi: 10.1002/smj.911
92. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
93. Mayo, E. (2003). The human problems of an industrial civilization (Vol. 6). London: Routledge.
94. McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1133-1156.
95. McEvily, B., Jaffee, J., & Tortoriello, M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933-1978. Organization Science, 23(2), 547-563. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0633
96. McFadyen, M. A., & Cannella, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746. doi: 10.2307/20159615
97. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
98. Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science, 49(4), 497-513. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.497.14422
99. Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York: Free Press.
100. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. doi: 10.1086/226550
101. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.
102. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 179-208. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
103. Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280-308. doi: 10.2307/256549
104. Miller, D. (1992). The generic strategy trap. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(1), 37-41. doi: 10.1108/eb039467
105. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.10.1161
106. Mizruchi, M. S., Stearns, L. B., & Fleischer, A. (2011). Getting a bonus: Social networks, performance, and reward among commercial bankers. Organization Science, 22(1), 42-59. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0516
107. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks (pp. 141-223). New York: Oxford University Press.
108. Monge, P. R., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. In F. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 304-342). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
109. Montgomery, J. D. (1992). Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 57, 586-596. doi: 10.2307/2095914
110. Mors, M. L. (2010). Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 841-872.
111. Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.
112. Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm-the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617-632. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0093
113. Nobel, R., & Birkinshaw, J. (1998). Innovation in multinational corporations: Control and communication patterns in international R & D operations. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 479-496. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<479::AID-SMJ954>3.0.CO;2-U
114. Nohria, N. & R. C. Eccles (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
115. Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.
116. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
117. Pastor, J. C., Meindl, J. R., & Mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 410-420. doi: 10.2307/3069355
118. Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 759-777. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083032
119. Perrow, C. (1986). Economic theories of organization. Theory and Society, 15(1), 11-45. doi: 10.1007/BF00156926
120. Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85-101. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785503
121. Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829-872. doi: 10.1086/230091
122. Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33-60. doi: 10.1086/323038
123. Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693. doi: 10.2307/2657354
124. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145. doi: 10.2307/2393988
125. Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., & Hinings, C. R. (1969). An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 115-126. doi: 10.2307/2391367
126. Rank, O. N., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2010). Structural logic of intra-organizational networks. Organization Science, 21(3), 745-764. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0450
127. Reagans, R. (2005). Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Science, 51(9), 1374-1383.
128. Reagans, R. (2011). Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22(4), 835-849. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0587
129. Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240-267. doi: 10.2307/3556658
130. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.502.10637
131. Reif, W. E., Monczka, R. M., & Newstrom, J. W. (1973). Perceptions of the formal and the informal organizations: Objective measurement through the semantic differential technique. Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 389-403. doi: 10.2307/255000
132. Roberson, Q. M., & Williamson, I. O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 685-701. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0491
133. Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541-562. doi: 10.1002/smj.398
134. Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
135. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306. doi: 10.1002/smj.160
136. Salancik, G. R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345-349. doi: 10.2307/2393642
137. Salk, J. E., & Brannen, M. Y. (2000). National culture, networks, and individual influence in a multinational management team. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 191-202. doi: 10.2307/1556376
138. Schilling, M. A. (2005). Strategic management of technological innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
139. Schulte, M., Cohen, N. A., & Klein, K. J. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564-581. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0582
140. Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
141. Shipilov, A. V. (2006). Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 590-604. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794676
142. Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73-108. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.1.73
143. Shrader, C. B., Lincoln, J. R., & Hoffman, A. N. (1989). The network structures of organizations: Effects of task contingencies and distributional form. Human Relations, 42(1), 43-66. doi: 10.1177/001872678904200103
144. Simon, H. A. (1947/1976). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.
145. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
146. Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
147. Smith-Doerr, L., & Powell, W. W. (2005). Networks and economic life. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 379-402). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
148. Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893-906. doi: 10.2307/20159629
149. Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2012). A network perspective on organizational architecture: Performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 751-771. doi: 10.1002/smj.1966
150. Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0519
151. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325. doi: 10.2307/3069458
152. Stieglitz, N., & Heine, K. (2007). Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1002/smj.565
153. Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
154. Sytch, M., Tatarynowicz, A., & Gulati, R. (2012). Toward a theory of extended contact: The incentives and opportunities for bridging across network communities. Organization Science, 23(6), 1658-1681. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0712
155. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic basis of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
156. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
157. Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519.
158. Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167-181. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037420
159. Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024-1039. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0688
160. Tsai, W. (2000). The formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200009)21:9<925::AID-SMJ129>3.0.CO;2-I
161. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. doi: 10.2307/3069443
162. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179-190. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536
163. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476. doi: 10.2307/257085
164. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 587-605. doi: 10.2307/2392402
165. Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305. doi: 10.2307/255842
166. Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 605-621. doi: 10.2307/255641
167. Van de Ven, A. H., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. R. (2013). Returning to the Frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393-440. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2013.774981
168. Vissa, B., & Chacar, A. S. (2009). Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams' external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1179-1191. doi: 10.1002/smj.785
169. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
170. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In G. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer Verlag.
171. Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90-122. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.90
172. Wong, S. S., & Boh, W. F. (2010). Leveraging the ties of others to build a reputation for trustworthiness among peers. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 129-148. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037265
173. Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.
174. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.
175. Zenger, T. R., Lazzarini, S. G., & Poppo, L. (2002). Informal and formal organization in new institutional economics. Advances in Strategic Management, 19, 277-305. doi: 10.1016/S0742-3322(02)19009-7