How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement?

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 43, Issue , 2016, Pages 39-51

  Järvelä, Sanna ^a   Järvenoja, Hanna ^a   Malmberg, Jonna ^a   Isohätälä, Jaana ^a   Sobocinski, Márta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cognitive interaction; Collaborative learning; Engagement; Self regulated learning; Socioemotional interaction; Videodata

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956926429     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andriessen J., Pardijs M., Baker M. Getting on and getting along. Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning 2013, 205-230. Routledge, New York. M. Baker, M. Andriessen, S. Järvelä (Eds.).
2. Azevedo R. Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist 2015, 50(1):84-94. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069.
3. Azevedo R., Harley J., Trevors G., Duffy M., Feyzi-Behnagh R., Bouchet F., et al. Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems. International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies 2013, 427-449. Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. R. Azevedo, V. Aleven (Eds.).
4. Blumenfeld P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M., Palincsar A. Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 1991, 26(3-4):369-398.
5. Chi M.T.H., Glaser R. Problem solving ability. Human abilities: An information processing approach 1985, 227-250. Freeman, San Francisco. R. Sternberg (Ed.).
6. Cleary T.J. Shifting towards self-regulation microanalytic assessment: historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011, 329-345. Routledge, Abingdon, UK. B.J. Zimmerman, D.L. Schunk (Eds.).
7. Cleary T., Zimmerman B. A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: theoretical foundations and applications. Handbook of research on student engagement SE - 11 2012, 237-257. Springer, US. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11, S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
8. Dent A., Hoyle R. A framework for evaluating and enhancing alignment in self-regulated learning research. Metacognition and Learning 2015, 10(1):165-179. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9136-4.
9. Dillenbourg P., Baker M.J., Blaye A., O'Malley C. The evolution of research on collaborative learning. Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science 1995, 189-211. Elsevier, Oxford. E. Spada, P. Reiman (Eds.).
10. Engle R.A., Conant F.R. Guiding principles for fostering disciplinary engagement: explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction 2002, 20(4):399-483. 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1.
11. Finn J.D., Pannozzo G.M., Voelkl K.E. Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal 1995, 95(5):421-434. http://doi.org/10.2307/1001656.
12. Fransen J., Weinberger A., Kirschner P.A. Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist 2013, 48(1):9-24. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.747947.
13. Fredricks J.A., Blumenfeld P.C., Paris A.H. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 2004, 74(1):59-109.
14. Fulmer S.M., D'Mello S.K., Strain A., Graesser A.C. Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2015, 41(2015):98-110. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.005.
15. Goetz T., Zirngibl A., Pekrun R., Hall N. Emotions, learning and achievement from an educational, psychological perspective. Learning emotions: The influence of affective factors on classroom learning 2003, 9-28. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main. P. Mayring, C. von Rhoeneck (Eds.).
16. Greene B.A. Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist 2015, (March):37-41. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.989230.
17. Greeno J.G. Learning in activity. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2006, 79-96. Cambridge University Press, New York. R.K. Sawyer (Ed.).
18. Hadwin A.F., Järvelä S., Miller M. Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011, 65-86. Routledge, New York. B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk (Eds.).
19. Hareli S., Weiner B. Social emotions and personality inferences: a scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist 2002, 37(3):183-193. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_4.
20. Janssen J., Erkens G., Kirschner P.A. Group awareness tools: it's what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior 2011, 27(3):1046-1058. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002.
21. Järvelä S., Hadwin A.F. New frontiers: regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist 2013, 48(1):25-39. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006.
22. Järvelä S., Kirschner P., Panadero E., Malmberg J., Phielix C., Jaspers J., Järvenoja H. Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development 2015, 63(1):125-142. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.
23. Järvelä S., Malmberg J., Koivuniemi M. Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCL. Learning and Instruction 2016, 42:1-11. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.006.
24. Järvelä S., Renninger K.A. Designing for learning: interest, motivation, and engagement. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2014, 668-685. Cambridge University Press, New York. 2nd ed. K. Sawyer (Ed.).
25. Järvelä S., Volet S., Järvenoja H. Research on motivation in collaborative learning: moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist 2010, 45(1):15-27.
26. Järvenoja H., Järvelä S. Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges?. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 79(Pt 3):463-481. http://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X402811.
27. Järvenoja H., Järvelä S., Malmberg J. Understanding the process of motivational, emotional and cognitive regulation in learning situations. Educational Psychologist 2015, 50(3):204-219.
28. Jonassen D. Learning to solve problems: A handbook 2010, Routledge, New York.
29. Kempler Rogat T., Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction 2011, 29(4):375-415. 10.1080/07370008.2011.607930.
30. Khosa D.K., Volet S. Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students' conceptual understanding?. Metacognition and Learning 2014, 9:287-307. 10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z.
31. Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Clark R.E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 2006, 41:75-86.
32. Kitchener K.S. Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: a three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development 1983, 26(4):222-232.
33. Knezic D., Wubbels T., Elbers E., Hajer M. The socratic dialogue in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 2010, 26:1104-1111.
34. Kreijns K., Kirschner P.a., Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior 2003, 19(3):335-353. 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2.
35. Lajoie S.P., Lee L., Poitras E., Bassiri M., Kazemitabar M., Cruz-Panesso I., Lu J. The role of regulation in medical student learning in small groups: regulating oneself and others' learning and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior 2015, 52:601-616. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.073.
36. Linnenbrink-Garcia L., Rogat T.K., Koskey K.L.K. Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2011, 36(1):13-24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.
37. Lodewyk K.R., Winne P.H., Jamieson-Noel D.L. Implications of task structure on self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychology 2009, 29(1):1-25. http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802447023.
38. Malmberg J., Järvelä S., Kirschner P.A. Elementary school students' strategic learning: does task-type matter?. Metacognition and Learning 2014, 9(2):113-136.
39. Malmberg J., Järvenoja H., Järvelä S. Patterns in elementary school students' strategic actions in varying learning situations. Instructional Science 2013, 41(5):933-954. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9262-1.
40. Mercer N. The quality of talk in children's joint activity at the computer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 1994, 10:24-32.
41. Miller M., Hadwin A. Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning November 2015, 52:573-588.
42. Miyake N., Kirschner P.A. The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences 2014, 418-438. Cambridge University Press, New York. K.R. Sawyer (Ed.).
43. Näykki P., Järvelä S., Kirschner P.A., Järvenoja H. Socioemotional conflict in collaborative learning-a process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research 2014, 68:1-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.07.001.
44. O'Donnell A.M., Hmelo-Silver H.E. What is collaborative learning: An overview. The International handbook of collaborative learning 2013, 1-15. Routledge, New York. C.E. Hmelo-Silver, C.A. Chinn, C.K.K. Chan, A. O'Donnell (Eds.).
45. Patrick H., Ryan A.M., Kaplan A. Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 99(1):83-98. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83.
46. Perry N.E. Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(4):715-729. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715.
47. Pintrich P. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 2004, 16(4):385-407. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.
48. Pintrich P.R., de Groot E.V. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 1990, 82(1):33-40. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
49. Pressley M., McCormick C. Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers and policy makers 1995, Harper Collins, New York.
50. Reimann P., Markauskaite L., Bannert M. E-research and learning theory: what do sequence and process mining methods contribute?. British Journal of Educational Technology 2014, 45(3):528-540. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12146.
51. Renninger K.A., Shumar W. The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the math. Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning 2004, 181-209. Cambridge University Press, New York. S. Barab, R. Kling, J.H. Gray (Eds.).
52. Rogat T.K., Adams-Wiggins K.R. Other-regulation in collaborative groups: implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science 2014, 42(6):879-904.
53. Roschelle J. Learning by collaborating: convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1992, 2(3):235-276. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1.
54. Roschelle J., Teasley S. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computer supported collaborative learning SE - 5 1995, Vol. 128:69-97. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5.
55. Schoor C., Bannert M. Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior 2012, 28(4):1321-1331. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016.
56. Sinatra G.M., Heddy B.C., Lombardi D. The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist 2015, 50(1):1-13. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924.
57. Sinha S., Kempler Rogat T., Adams-Wiggins K.R., Hmelo-Silver C.E. Collaborative group engagement in a CSCL environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2015, 10:273-307. 10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y.
58. Sonnenberg C., Bannert M. Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics 2015, 2(2015):72-100.
59. Van den Bossche P., Gijselaers W.H., Segers M., Kirschner P.A. Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research 2006, 37(5):490-521. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406292938.
60. Van der Haar S., Segers M., Jehn K.A. Towards a contextualized model of team learning processes and outcomes. Educational Research Review 2013, 10:1-12. 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.04.001.
61. Veermans M., Järvelä S. Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science 2004, 32(4):269-291. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:%20TRUC.0000026465.74406.47.
62. Volet S., Mansfield C. Group work at university: significance of personal goals in the regulation strategies of students with positive and negative appraisals. Higher Education Research & Development 2006, 25(4):341-356. http://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600947301.
63. Volet S., Vauras M., Salonen P. Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: an integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist 2009, 44(4):215-226. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213584.
64. Winne P.H. Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science 1982, 11(1):13-28. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120978.
65. Winne P.H. Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives 2001, Vol. 2:153-189. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.
66. Winne P.H., Hadwin A. The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications 2008, 297-314. Routledge. D.H. Schunk, B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.).
67. Winne P.H., Hadwin A.F., Perry N.E. Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. International handbook of collaborative learning 2013, 462-479. Taylor & Francis, New York. C. Hmelo-Silver, A. O'Donnell, C. Chan, C. Chinn (Eds.).
68. Wolters C.A., Pintrich P.R. Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, english, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science 1998, 26(1-2):27-47. http://doi.org/1573-1952.
69. Wolters C.A., Taylor D. A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. Handbook of research on student engagement 2012, 635-651. Springer, US. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_30, S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, C. Wylie (Eds.).
70. Zimmerman B.J. Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25(1):82-91. http://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
71. Zimmerman B.J. From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: a social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist 2013, 48(3):135-147. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676.
72. Zimmerman B.J., Cleary T.J. Adolescents' development of personal agency: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents 2006, Vol. 5:45-69. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich.
73. Zimmerman B.J., Kitsantas A. Self-regulated learning of a motoric skill: the role of goal setting and self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 1996, 8(1):60-75. http://doi.org/10.1080/10413209608406308.
74. Zimmerman B.J., Schunk D.H. Self-regulated learning and performance: an introduction and an overview. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance 2011, 1-12. Routledge, New York. B.J. Zimmerman, D.H. Schunk (Eds.).