E-Research and learning theory: What do sequence and process mining methods contribute?

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 528-540

  Reimann, Peter ^a   Markauskaite, Lina ^a   Bannert, Maria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; ELECTRIC GROUNDING; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; CRITICAL REALISMS; EDUCATIONAL DATA MINING; LEARNING THEORY; MULTI-MODAL DATA; ONTOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; PROCESS MINING; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84898783211     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12146     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archer, M. S., Lawson, T., &, Collier, A., (1998). Critical realism: essential readings. London: Routledge.
2. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., &, Chauncey, A. D., (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45, 210-223.
3. Bannert, M., (2007). Metakognition beim lernen mit hypermedien (Metacognition when learning with hypermedia). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
4. Bannert, M., &, Reimann, P., (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 40, 1, 193-211.
5. Bannert, M., Reimann, P., &, Sonnenberg, C., (2013). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, DOI: 10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
6. Barsalou, L. W., (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
7. Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C., &, Smith, L. B., (2007). Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing, 8, 2, 79-91. (Pubitemid 46835840)
8. Bhaskar, R., (1975). A realist theory of science. London: Leeds Books Ltd.
9. Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J. S., Sulcer, B., &, Roscoe, R., (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5, 2, 123-152.
10. Boekaerts, M., (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 2, 161-186. (Pubitemid 127160028)
11. Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Dirks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., Lynch, C., etal (2008). Fostering learning in the networked world: the cyberlearning opportunity and challenge. A 21st century agenda for the National Science Foundation. Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning. June 24, 2008.
12. Damasio, A. R., (2012). Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Vintage books.
13. Ericsson, K. A., &, Simon, H. A., (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Ferguson, R., (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: a review and future challenges a review and future challenges (Technical report KMI-12-01). Milton Keynes, UK: Knowledge Media Institute. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-12-01.pdf
15. Günther, C. W., &, van der Aalst, W. M. P., (2007). Fuzzy mining-adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam & M. Rosemann (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2007) 24-28 September 2007, Brisbane, Australia (pp. 328-343). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from http://www.tue.nl/en/publication/ep/p/d/ep-uid/210572
16. Harré, R., &, Madden, E. H., (1975). Causal powers. A theory of natural necessity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17. Hey, T., Tansley, S., &, Tolle, K., (Eds) (2009). The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Remond: Microsoft Research.
18. House, E. R., (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 20, 6, 2-9.
19. Hume, D., (1739). A treatise of human nature. London: John Noon.
20. Kirsh, D., (2009). Problem solving and situated cognition. In, P. Robbins, &, M. Aydede, (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp 264-306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lewandowsky, S., &, Farrell, S., (2011). Computational modeling in cognition: principles and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Manicas, P. T., &, Secord, P. F., (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38, 399-413.
23. McClelland, J. L., (2010). Emergence in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 751-770.
24. Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Ontology. Retrieved November 27, 2013, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ontology
25. Miller, G. A., (1956). The magical number seven, plus minus two. Some limits on our capacity to process information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-87.
26. Moos, D. C., &, Azevedo, R., (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? Metacognition and Learning, 4, 3, 197-216.
27. Pawson, R., (2006). Evidence-based policy. A realist perspective. London: Sage.
28. Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., &, Thompson, K., (2009). Using process mining to identify models of group decision making processes in chat data. In, C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, &, A. Dimitracopoulou, (Eds), Computer-supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp 98-107). Rhodes, Greece: International Society for the Learning Sciences.
29. Reimann, P., &, Yacef, K., (2013). Using process mining for understanding learning. In, R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. D. M. Underwood, &, N. Winters, (Eds), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp 472-481). New York: Taylor & Francis.
30. Reisig, W., (1985). Petri nets. An introduction. Berlin: Springer.
31. Salmon, W. C., (1998). Causality and explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Sayer, A., (2000). Realism and social science (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
33. Schoor, C., &, Bannert, M., (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 4, 1321-1331.
34. Smith, B., (1995). Formal ontology, common sense and cognitive science. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 641-667.
35. Smith, B., (2004). Beyond concepts, or: ontology as reality representation. In, A. Achille Varzi, &, L. Vieu, (Eds), Formal ontology in information systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004) (pp 73-84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
36. Snow, R. E., (1991). Aptitude-treatment interactions as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 59, 205-216.
37. Thompson, K., &, Markauskaite, L., (in press). Analysing group processes for assessment in virtual worlds in higher education. In, S. Kennedy-Clark, K. Everett, &, P. Wheeler, (Eds), Cases on assessment in scenario and game-based virtual worlds in higher education (in press).
38. Trčka, N., Pechenizkiy, M., &, van der Aalst, W. M. P., (2010). Process mining from educational data. In, C. Robero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, &, R. Baker, (Eds), Handbook of educational data mining (pp 123-142). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
39. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., (2011). Process mining. Discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes. Heidelberg: Springer.
40. Van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weijters, A. J. M. M., &, Maruster, L., (2004). Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16, 9, 1128-1142.
41. Winne, P. H., (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267-276.
42. Winne, P. H., &, Hadwin, A. F., (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In, D. Schunk, &, B. Zimmerman, (Eds), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp 297-314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., &, Gress, C., (2010). The learning kit project: software tools for supporting and researching regulation of collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 5, 787-793.
44. Winne, P. H., &, Nesbit, J. C., (1995). Graph theoretic techniques for examining patterns and strategies in students' studying: an application of LogMill. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1995 April.
45. Winne, P. H., &, Perry, N. E., (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In, P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, &, M. Seidner, (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation (pp 531-566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46. Zhao, C. M., &, Luan, J., (2006). Data mining: going beyond traditional statistics. New Directions for Institutional Research, 131, 7-16.
47. Zhou, M., Xu, Y. X., Nesbit, J. C., &, Winne, P. H., (2010). Sequential pattern analysis of learning logs: methodology and applications. In, C. Robero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, &, R. Baker, (Eds), Handbook of educational data mining (pp 107-121). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.