The four-component instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 104-148

  van Merriënboer, Jeroen J G ^a   Kester, Liesbeth ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952650602     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (146)

1. Ainsworth, S., & van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction,14, 241-255.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., & Shirey, L. L. (1983). Effects of the reader’s schema at different points in time. Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 271-279.
5. Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research,70, 181-214.
6. Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 287-298.
7. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
8. Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (rev. ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
9. Bannert, M. (2000). The effects of training wheels and self-learning materials in software training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,16, 336-346.
10. Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science,37, 345-363.
11. Boucheix, J. M., Lowe, R. K., Kemala-Putri, D., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction,25, 71-84.
12. Camp, G., Paas, F., Rikers, R., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2001). Dynamic problem selection in air trafic control training: A comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior,17, 575-595.
13. Carlson, R. A., Khoo, H., & Elliot, R. G. (1990). Component practice and exposure to a problem-solving context. Human Factors,32, 267-286.
14. Carlson, R. A., Sullivan, M. A., & Schneider, W. (1989). Component fluency in a problem solving context. Human Factors,31, 489-502.
15. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making use: Scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Cho, Y. H., & Jonassen, D. H. (2012). Learning by self-explaining causal diagrams in high-school biology. Asia Pacific Education Review,13(1), 171-184.
17. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review,3, 149-210.
18. Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology, Research and Development,53, 15-24.
19. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science,34, 399-422.
20. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on eficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology,33, 733-756.
21. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 290-298.
22. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). Learner-controlled selection of tasks with different surface and structural features: Effects on transfer and eficiency. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 76-81.
23. Corradi, D., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2012). Understanding and enhancing the use of multiple representations in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education and Technology,21, 780-795.
24. Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. de Croock, M. B. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Paradoxical effects of information presentation formats and contextual interference on transfer of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior,23, 1740-1761.
26. de Croock, M. B. M., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behavior,14, 249-267.
27. de Grave, W. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2001). Effects of problembased discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical students. Instructional Science,29, 33-44.
28. de Jong, A. J. M., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,68, 179-201.
29. Devolder, P., Pynoo, B., Voet, T., Adang, L., Vercruysse, J., & Duyck, P. (2009). Optimizing physicians’ instruction of PACS through e-learning: Cognitive load theory applied. Journal of Digital Imaging,22(1), 25-33.
30. de Westelinck, K., Valcke, M., de Craene, B., & Kirschner, P. (2005). The cognitive theory of multimedia learning in the social sciences knowledge domain: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior,21, 555-573.
31. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Thibodeau-Hardiman, P., & Mestre, J. P. (1992). Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the Learning Sciences,2, 307-331.
32. Fulgham, S. M. (2008). The effects of varying levels of support through worked examples on achievement in software application training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.
33. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning (4Thed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Gagné, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology, Research and Development,38, 23-30.
35. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instructional Science,32, 33-58.
36. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction,4, 313-331.
37. Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction,16, 511-525.
38. Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E., & Radin, D. I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 500-510.
39. Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, Th. J., & Martens, R. L. (2005). The surplus value of an authentic learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior,21, 509-521.
40. Gurlitt, J., Dummel, S., Schuster, S., & Nückles, M. (2012). Differently structured advance organizers lead to different initial schemata and learning outcomes. Instructional Science,40, 351-369.
41. Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,24, 407-419.
42. Gurlitt, J., Renkl, A., Motes, M., & Hauser, S. (2006). How can we use concept maps for prior knowledge activation-different mapping-tasks lead to different cognitive processes. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences(pp. 217-221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Hassanabadi, H., Robatjazi, E. S., & Savoji, A. P. (2011). Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,30, 1481-1487.
44. Hatsidimitris, G., & Kalyuga, S. (2013). Guided self-management of transient information in animations through pacing and sequencing strategies. Educational Technology Research & Development,61, 91-105.
45. Helsdingen, A. S., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011a). The effects of practice schedule on learning a complex judgment task. Learning and Instruction,21, 126-136.
46. Helsdingen, A. S., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011b). The effects of practice schedule and critical thinking prompts on learning and transfer of a complex judgment task. Journal of Educational Psychology,103, 383-398.
47. Höfler, T. N., & Schwartz, R. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers and Education,57, 1716-1726.
48. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (Eds.) (1989). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Imhof, B., Scheiter, K., Edelmann, J., & Gerjets, P. (2012). How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns. Learning and Instruction,22, 193-205.
50. Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction,20, 146-154.
51. Jarodzka, H., van Gog, T., Dorr, M., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2013). Learning to see: Guiding students’ attention via a model’s eye movements fosters learning. Learning and Instruction,25, 62-70.
52. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Adding the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior,26, 1246-1252.
53. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,18, 178-191.
54. Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior,26, 1496-1507.
55. Kalyuga, S. (2008). Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: An effect of learner prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior,24, 852-861.
56. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., & Chandler, P. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 23-31.
57. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 126-136.
58. Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the eficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development,53, 83-93.
59. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004a). Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits. International Journal of Science Education,26, 239-256.
60. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004b). Timing of information presentation in learning statistics. Instructional Science,32, 233-252.
61. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer simulated problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 1-16.
62. Khacharem, A., Spanjers, I., Zoudji, B., Kalyuga, S., & Ripoll, H. (2012). Using segmentation to support the learning from animated soccer scenes: An effect of prior knowledge. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,14, 154-160.
63. Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Slot, W. (2009a). Design and evaluation of a development portfolio: How to improve students’ self-directed learning skills. Instructional Science,37, 453-473.
64. Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Slot, W. (2009b). The effects of portfolio-based advice on the development of self-directed learning skills in secondary vocational education. Educational Technology, Research and Development,57, 439-460.
65. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 306-314.
66. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction,21, 587-599.
67. Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Edelmann, J. (2011). The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 29-35.
68. Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benei ts of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Computers and Education,56, 176-187.
69. Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 401-418.
70. Lee, C. H., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Effectiveness of on-screen pinyin in learning Chinese: An expertise reversal for multimedia redundancy effect. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 11-15.
71. Leppink, J., Broers, N. J., Imbos, T., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Berger, M. P. F. (2012). Self-explanation in the domain of statistics: An expertise reversal effect. Higher Education,63, 771-785.
72. Leutner, D. (2000). Double-fading support: A training approach to complex software systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,16, 347-357.
73. Limniou, M., & Whitehead, C. (2010). Online general pre-laboratory training course for facilitating i rst year chemical laboratory use. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences,5, 39-55.
74. Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Tsai, M. J., & Paas, F. (2012). Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments. Computers and Education,56, 172-181.
75. Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1993). Effects of mobilizing prior knowledge on information processing: Studies of free recall and allocation of study time. British Journal of Psychology,84, 481-498.
76. Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1995). The effect of prior knowledge activation on text recall: An investigation of two conflicting hypotheses. British Journal of Educational Psychology,65, 409-423.
77. Maran, N. J., & Glavin, R. J. (2003). Low-to high-fidelity simulation: A continuum of medical education? Medical Education,37(1), 22-28.
78. Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 377-389.
79. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2d ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
80. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 390-397.
81. Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 380-386.
82. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 43-52.
83. Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,8, 147-154.
84. Merrill, M. D. (2012). First principles of instruction. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
85. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 156-163.
86. Moussa-Inaty, J., Ayres, P. L., & Sweller, J. (2012). Improving listening skills in English as a foreign language by reading rather than listening: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology,26, 391-402.
87. Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities. Learning and Instruction,21, 614-624.
88. Musallam, R. (2010). The effects of using screencasting as a multimedia pre-training tool to manage the intrinsic cognitive load of chemical equilibrium instruction for advanced high school chemistry students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco.
89. Nkambou, R., Bordeau, J., & Mizoguchi, R. (Eds.) (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Berlin: Springer.
90. Nokes, T. J., Hausmann, R. G. M., van Lehn, K., & Gershman, S. (2011). Testing the instructional i t hypothesis: The case of self-explanation prompts. Instructional Science,39, 645-666.
91. Olina, Z., Reiser, R. A., Huang, X., Lim, J., & Park, S. (2006). Problem format and presentation sequence: Effects on learning and mental effort among US high school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology,20, 299-309.
92. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 122-133.
93. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Palmeri, T. J. (1999). Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,25, 543-551.
95. Penney, C. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term working memory. Memory and Cognition,17, 398-422.
96. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher,18, 16-25.
97. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education,21, 31-61.
98. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction,12, 61-86.
99. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology,88, 144-161.
100. Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2009). Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments: Effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency. Learning and Instruction,19, 411-422.
101. Renkl, A. (1999). Learning mathematics from worked-out examples: Analyzing and fostering self-explanations. European Journal of Psychology of Education,14, 477-488.
102. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 15-22.
103. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Grosse, C. S. (2004). How fading worked solution steps works: A cognitive load perspective. Instructional Science,32, 59-82.
104. Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Research Review,7, 216-237.
105. Roelle, J., & Berthold, K. (2013). The expertise reversal effect in prompting focused processing of instructional explanations. Instructional Science,41, 635-656. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9247-0.
106. Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., Broers, N. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air trafic control training. Instructional Science,32, 153-172.
107. Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior,22, 321-333.
108. Salomon, G. (1998). Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction,1(1), 3-12.
109. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., & Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction,19, 481-494.
110. Schimpf, F., & Spannagel, C. (2011). Reducing the graphical interface of a dynamic geometry system. ZDM Mathematics Education,43, 389-397.
111. Schmidt, H. G., de Volder, M. L., de Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology,81, 610-619.
112. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system-and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction,20, 100-110.
113. Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 49-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development,53, 47-58.
115. Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., & Salden, R. (2009). The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 258-266.
116. Seufert, T., Schütze, M., & Brünken, R. (2009). Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction,19, 28-42.
117. Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., Wouters, P., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing. Computers and Education,59, 274-280.
118. Spanjers, I. A. E., Wouters, P., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 46-52.
119. Spannagel, C., Girwidz, R., Löthe, H., Zendler, A., & Schroeder, U. (2008). Animated demonstrations and training wheels interfaces in a complex learning environment. Interacting with Computers,20, 97-111.
120. Straetmans, G., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Bolhuis, B., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2003). Integratie van instructie en assessment in competentiegericht onderwijs [Integration of instruction and assessment in competence-based education]. Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs,21, 171-197.
121. Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Affective impact of navigational and signaling aids to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior,28, 473-483.
122. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
123. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review,10, 251-296.
124. Tabbers, H. K. (2002). The modality of text in multimedia instructions: Rei ning the design guidelines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
125. Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology,74(1), 71-82.
126. Taminiau, E. M. C. (2013). Advisory models for on-demand learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
127. van Genuchten, E., Scheiter, K., & Schüler, A. (2012). Examining learning from text and pictures for different task types: Does the multimedia effect differ for conceptual, causal, and procedural tasks? Computers in Human Behavior,28, 2209-2218.
128. van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Paas, F. (2009). Attention guidance during example study via the model’s eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior,25, 785-791.
129. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research,6, 265-285.
130. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
131. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology, Research and Development,50, 39-64.
132. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & de Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computerbased programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research,8, 365-394.
133. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Jelsma, O., & Paas, F. (1992). Training for rel ective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology, Research & Development,40, 23-43.
134. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Ten steps to complex learning (2d ed.). New York: Routledge.
135. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learners’ mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 5-13.
136. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Luursema, J. J. (1996). Implementing instructional models in computer-based learning environments: A case study in problem selection. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential(pp. 184-206). Berlin: Springer.
137. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners’ attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training eficiency. Learning and Instruction,12, 11-37.
138. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sluijsmans, D. A. (2009). Toward a synthesis of cognitive load theory, four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review,17, 147-177.
139. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review,17, 147-177.
140. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2012). Technology-based assessment in the integrated curriculum. In M. C. Mayrath, J. Clarke-Midura, D. H. Robinson, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills (pp. 245-370). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
141. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior,26, 506-515.
142. Wetzels, S. (2009). Individualised strategies for prior knowledge activation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.
143. Wickens, C. D., Hutchins, S., Carolan, T., & Cumming, J. (2013). Part task training and increasing dificulty training strategies: A meta-analysis approach. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,55, 461-470.
144. Willoughby, T., Wood, E., Desmarais, S., Sims, S., & Kalra, M. (1997). Mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of elaboration strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 682-685.
145. Yeh, Y. F., Chen, M. C., Hung, P. H., & Hwang, G.. J. (2010). Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments. Computers and Education,54, 1089-1100.
146. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives(2d Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.