Multiple forms of dynamic representation

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 241-255

  Ainsworth, Shaaron ^a   VanLabeke, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544287649     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ainsworth S. The functions of multiple representations Computers & Education 33 1999 131-152
2. Ainsworth S. Bibby P. Wood D. Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 2002 25-61
3. Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2001). A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating multi-representational learning environments. Paper presented at the 9th EARLI conference, Fribourg.
4. Bétrancourt M. Tversky B. Effect of computer animation on users' performance: a review Le Travail Humain 63 2000 311-330
5. Bibby P.A. Payne S.J. Internalisation and the use specificity of device knowledge Human-Computer Interaction 8 1993 25-56
6. Brown, M.H. (1988). Perspectives on algorithm animation, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI '88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 33-38). New York: ACM Press.
7. Chandler P. Sweller J. The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction British Journal of Educational Psychology 62 1992 233-246
8. Cox R. Brna P. Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6 1995 239-302
9. de Jong T. Ainsworth S.E. Dobson M. van der Hulst A. Levonen J. Reimann P. Sime J. van Someren M. Spada H. Swaak J. Acquiring knowledge in science and math: the use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. Van Someren M.W. Reimann P. Boshuizen H.P.A. & de Jong T. (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations 1998 9-40 Elsevier Science Amsterdam
10. de Jong T. van Joolingen W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains Review of Educational Research 68 2 1998 179-201
11. Dienes Z. The six stages in the process of learning mathematics 1973 NFER-Nelson Slough, UK
12. Gilmore D.J. Green T.R.G. Comprehension and recall of miniature programs International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 21 1984 31-48
13. Kaiser M. Proffitt D. Whelan S. Hecht H. Influence of animation on dynamical judgements Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1992 669-690
14. Kozma R.B. Russell J. Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 1997 949-968
15. Larkin J.H. Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words Cognitive Science 11 1987 65-99
16. Lowe R.K. Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning European Journal of Psychology of Education 14 1999 225-244
17. Lowe R.K. Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics Learning and Instruction 13 2003 157-176
18. Mayer R.E. Sims V.K. For whom is a picture worth 1000 words-extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning Journal of Educational Psychology 86 1994 389-401
19. Pane, J.F., Corbett, A.T., & John, B.E. (1996). Assessing Dynamics in Computer-Based Instruction. In CHI 96 Electronic Conference Proceedings. Retrieved May 18, 2003: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Pane/jfp_txt.htm
20. Peebles D. Cheng P.C.H. Graph based reasoning: From task analysis to cognitive explanation. Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society 2001 LEA Mahwah, NJ
21. Price, S.J. (2002). Diagram Representation: The Cognitive Basis for Understanding Animation in Education (Technical Report 553): School of Computing and Cognitive Sciences, University of Sussex.
22. Rieber L.P. Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children Journal of Educational Psychology 82 1990 135-140
23. Rieber L.P. Animation, incidental learning and continuing motivation Journal of Educational Psychology 83 1991 318-328
24. Scanlon E. How beginning students use graphs of motion. van Someren M.W. Reimann P. Boshuizen H.P.A. & de Jong T. (Eds.). Learning with multiple representations 1998 9-40 Elsevier Science Amsterdam
25. Schnotz W. Böckheler J. Grzöndziel H. Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures European Journal of Psychology of Education 14 1999 245-265
26. Shah P. Carpenter P.A. Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 124 1995 43-61
27. Steed M. STELLA, a simulation construction kit: Cognitive process and educational implications Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 11 1992 39-52
28. Stenning K. Distinguishing semantic from processing explanations of usability of representations: applying expressiveness analysis to animation. Lee J. (Ed.), Intelligence and multimodality in multimedia interfaces: research and applications 1998 AAAI Press Cambridge; MA
29. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
30. Tabachneck H.J.M. Koedinger K.R. Nathan M.J. Towards a theoretical account of strategy use and sense making in mathematical problem solving. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 1994 836-841 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
31. Van Labeke N. Ainsworth S.E. Representational decisions when learning population dynamics with an instructional simulation, Cerri S.A. Gouardères G. & Paraguaçu F. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems Proceedings of the 6th International Conference ITS 2002 2002 831-840 Springer-Verlag Berlin
32. Wedekind J. Learning about dynamic biological systems-a simulation and modeling approach. Informatics and changes in learning. Johnson D.C. & Samways B. (Eds.). Informatics and changes in learning 1993 143-148 Elsevier Amsterdam
33. White B.Y. Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton's laws of motion Cognition and Instruction 1 1984 69-108
34. Winn B. Charts, graphs and diagrams in educational materials. Willows D.M. & Houghton H.A. (Eds.). The psychology of illustration 1987 152-198 Springer New York
35. Zhang J.J. The nature of external representations in problem solving Cognitive Science 21 1997 179-217