Genome editing: The end of the beginning

Genome Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Doudna, Jennifer A ^a,b   Gersbach, Charles A ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Duke University   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRISPR ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; DNA; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; SMALL INTERFERING RNA;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DISEASE RESISTANCE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA MODIFICATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; EDITORIAL; EPIGENETICS; GENE CONTROL; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE SILENCING; GENE THERAPY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC MANIPULATION; GENOME EDITING; HUMAN; JELLYFISH; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; PROKARYOTE; STREPTOCOCCUS PYOGENES; WORM; ANIMAL; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENOME; PROCEDURES; TARGETED GENE REPAIR;

ANIMALS; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENOME; HUMANS; TARGETED GENE REPAIR;

EID: 84951782881     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0860-5     Document Type: Editorial

References (37)

1. Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346(6213):1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096.
2. Barrangou R. Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines. Genome Biol. 2015;16:247. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0816-9.
3. Fonfara I, Le Rhun A, Chylinski K, Makarova KS, Lecrivain AL, Bzdrenga J, et al. Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(4):2577-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1074.
4. Esvelt KM, Mali P, Braff JL, Moosburner M, Yaung SJ, Church GM. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat Methods. 2013;10(11):1116-21. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2681.
5. Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature. 2015;520(7546):186-91. doi: 10.1038/nature14299.
6. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038.
7. Shmakov S, Abudayyeh OO, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Gootenberg JS, Semenova E, et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell. 2015;60(3):385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008.
8. Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Young J, Bigelyte G, Silanskas A, Cigan M, et al. Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 2015;16:253. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0818-7.
9. Knight SC, Xie L, Deng W, Guglielmi B, Witkowsky LB, Bosanac L, et al. Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science. 2015;350(6262):823-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6572.
10. Sternberg SH, LaFrance B, Kaplan M, Doudna JA. Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature. 2015;527(7576):110-3. doi: 10.1038/nature15544.
11. Jasin M, Rothstein R. Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(11):a012740. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012740.
12. Graham DB, Root DE. Resources for the design of CRISPR gene editing experiments. Genome Biol. 2015;16:260. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0823-x.
13. Wong N, Liu W, Wang X. WU-CRISPR: characteristics of functional guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Genome Biol. 2015;16:218. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0784-0.
14. Xi L, Schmidt JC, Zaug AJ, Ascarrunz DR, Cech TR. A novel two-step genome editing strategy with CRISPR-Cas9 provides new insights into telomerase action and TERT gene expression. Genome Biol. 2015;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0791-1.
15. Jiang P, Wang H, Li W, Zang C, Li B, Wong YJ, et al. Network analysis of gene essentiality in functional genomics experiments. Genome Biol. 2015;16:239. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0808-9.
16. Singer M, Marshall J, Heiss K, Mair GR, Grimm D, Mueller AK, et al. Zinc finger nuclease-based double-strand breaks attenuate malaria parasites and reveal rare microhomology-mediated end joining. Genome Biol. 2015;16:249. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0811-1.
17. Cermak T, Baltes NJ, Cegan R, Zhang Y, Voytas DF. High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol. 2015;16:232. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9.
18. Wang ZP, Xing HL, Dong L, Zhang HY, Han CY, Wang XC, et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 2015;16:144. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0715-0.
19. Ali Z, Abulfaraj A, Idris A, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol. 2015;16:238. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6.
20. Lawrenson T, Shorinola O, Stacey N, Li C, Ostergaard L, Patron N, et al. Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genome Biol. 2015;16:258. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7.
21. Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalan C, Cho SW, Kim H, et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:1162-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3389.
22. Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Gao C, et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(9):947-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2969.
23. Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Chen K, Liang Z, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(8):686-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650.
24. Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JD, Kamoun S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(8):691-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2655.
25. Porteus MH. Towards a new era in medicine: therapeutic genome editing. Genome Biol. 2015;16:286.
26. Friedland AE, Baral R, Singhal P, Loveluck K, Shen S, Sanchez M, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9: a smaller Cas9 for all-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and paired nickase applications. Genome Biol. 2015;16:257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0817-8.
27. Hilton IB, Gersbach CA. Enabling functional genomics with genome engineering. Genome Res. 2015;25(10):1442-55. doi: 10.1101/gr.190124.115.
28. Maeder ML, Angstman JF, Richardson ME, Linder SJ, Cascio VM, Tsai SQ, et al. Targeted DNA demethylation and activation of endogenous genes using programmable TALE-TET1 fusion proteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1137-42. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2726.
29. Mendenhall EM, Williamson KE, Reyon D, Zou JY, Ram O, Joung JK, et al. Locus-specific editing of histone modifications at endogenous enhancers. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1133-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2701.
30. Konermann S, Brigham MD, Trevino AE, Hsu PD, Heidenreich M, Cong L, et al. Optical control of mammalian endogenous transcription and epigenetic states. Nature. 2013;500(7463):472-6. doi: 10.1038/nature12466.
31. Kearns NA, Pham H, Tabak B, Genga RM, Silverstein NJ, Garber M, et al. Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):401-3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3325.
32. Hilton IB, D'Ippolito AM, Vockley CM, Thakore PI, Crawford GE, Reddy TE, et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):510-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3199.
33. Cui C, Gan Y, Gu L, Wilson J, Liu Z, Zhang B, et al. P16-specific DNA methylation by engineered zinc finger methyltransferase inactivates gene transcription and promotes cancer metastasis. Genome Biol. 2015;16:252. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0819-6.
34. Thakore PI, D'Ippolito AM, Song L, Safi A, Shivakumar NK, Kabadi AM, et al. Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(12):1143-9. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3630.
35. Shapiro B. Mammoth 2.0: will genome engineering resurrect extinct species? Genome Biol. 2015;16:228. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0800-4.
36. Carroll D, Charo RA. The societal opportunities and challenges of genome editing. Genome Biol. 2015;16:242. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0812-0.
37. Joung JK, Voytas DF, Kamens J. Accelerating research through reagent repositories: the genome editing example. Genome Biol. 2015;16:255. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0830-y.