The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 34, Issue , 2013, Pages 45-69

  Gilabert, Roger ^a   Barón, Júlia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939472226     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.34.06ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to request in a second language: Child interlanguage pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
2. Alcón, E. (2008). Investigating pragmatic language learning in foreign language classrooms. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 173-195.
3. Alcón, E., & Martínez-Flor, A. (Eds.). (2008). Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
4. Alegría de la Colina, A., & García-Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
5. Baralt, M, (2010). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279-304.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Griffin, R. (2005). L2 pragmatic awareness: Evidence from the ESL classroom. System, 33, 401-415.
8. Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1989). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196-213.
10. Bouton, L. F. (1996). Pragmatics and language learning. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, monograph series vol. 7 (pp. 1-20). Urbana-Champaign, IL: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
11. Casini, L., & Macar, F. (1997). Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812-818.
12. Chastain, G., & Ferraro, F. R. (1997). Duration ratings as an index of processing resources required for cognitive tasks. The Journal of General Psychology, 124, 49-76.
13. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate in the classroom: A study of two language learners' requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 1-23.
15. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25-66.
16. Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2007). Pragmatic development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4, 253-286.
17. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-323.
18. García, C. (1989). Disagreeing in requesting by Americans and Venezuelans. Linguistics and Education, 1, 299-322.
19. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review 19, 3-17.
20. Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Barcelona.
21. Gilabert, R. (2007a). Effects of manipulating task cognitive complexity on interactional modifications during L2 oral performance. Paper presented at the European Second Language Association (EUROSLA) 17 Conference, University of Newcastle, 11-14 September.
22. Gilabert, R. (2007b). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning and +/− Here- and-Now: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44-68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
23. Gilabert, R. (2007c). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 215-240.
24. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Llanes, M. A. (2009). Manipulating congnitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners' interaction during task performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 367-395.
25. Gilabert, R., Barón, J., & Levkina, M. (2011). Manipulating task complexity across task types and modes. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 105-138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
27. Hassall, T. (2003). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1903-1928.
28. Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Temple University Japan.
29. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311-394.
30. Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effects of increasing task complexity along the [+/− Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 narrative discourse. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136-156). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
31. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
32. Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: a meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165-211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149-169.
34. Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481-501.
35. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Kormos, J. (2011). Speech production and the Cognition Hypothesis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 39-60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing perfomance. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. P. García Mayo, & J. Cenoz (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, Volume 5 (pp. 195-222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 117-135). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
39. Levkina, M., & Gilabert, R. (2011). Task sequencing in the L2 acquisition of spatial expressions. Task-based Language Teaching Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
40. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York NY: Academic Press.
41. Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
43. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
44. Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22, 673-686.
45. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
47. MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Martínez-Flor, A. (2004). The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: A study based on suggestions. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Universitat Jaume I.
49. Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukaya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners' production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33, 463-480.
50. Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24, 465-491.
51. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition, (pp. 323-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Michel, M. (2011). Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 141-174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Michel, M., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 241-259.
54. Nuevo, A. (2006). Task complexity and interaction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.
55. Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner-learner interaction. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 175-202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Ong, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2010). Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 219-233.
57. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
58. Pearson, L. (2006). Patterns of development in Spanish L2 pragmatic acquisition: an analysis of novice learners' production of directives. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 473-495.
59. Quesada, J., Kintsch, W. & Gomez, E. (2005). Complex problem-solving: A field in search of a definition? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 5-33.
60. Rahimpour, M. (1997). Task condition, task complexity and variation in L2 discourse. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Queensland.
61. Révész, A. (2009). Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 437-470.
62. Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Mackey, A. (2011). Task complexity, uptake of recasts, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 203-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
64. Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
65. Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.
67. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 55, 1-32.
68. Robinson, P. (2007a). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, (pp. 7-26). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
69. Robinson, P. (2007b). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193-213.
70. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 161-176.
71. Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second Language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72. Rose, K. R. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 27-67.
73. Scarcela, R. (1979). On speaking politely in a second language. In C. A. Yorio, K. Perkins & J. Schachter (Eds.), On TESOL'79: The learner in focus (pp. 275-287). Washington DC: TESOL.
74. Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (Eds.). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 137-174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
75. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.). Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
77. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-211.
78. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidelhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom SLA (pp. 64-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
80. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 370-391.
81. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
82. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form though collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Longman.
83. Taguchi, N. (2007). Task difficulty in oral speech act production. Applied Linguistics, 28, 113-135.
84. Takahashi, S., & Duffon, M. (1989). Cross-linguistic influence in indirectness: The case of directives performed by native Japanese speakers. Unpublished paper, Department of English as a Second Language. University of Hawai'i at Manoa. Honolulu.
85. Trosborg, A. (1987). Apology strategies in native/non-native speakers of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 147-167.
86. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.