The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 241-259

  Michel, Marije C ^a   Kuiken, Folkert ^a   Vedder, Ineke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548698873     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2007.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Doughty, Catherine (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, Peter Robinson (ed.), 206-257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Ellis, Rod and Fangyuan Yuan (2005). The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, Rod Ellis (ed.), 167-192. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
3. Foster, Pauline, Alan Tonkyn and Gillian Wigglesworth (2000). Measuring spoken language: A. unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 354-375.
4. Gass, Susan M. (2005). Input and interaction. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, Catherine Doughty and Michael H. Long (eds.), 224-255. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
5. Gilabert, Roger (2005). Task Complexity and L2 Narrative Oral Production. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
6. _ (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and +/- here-and-now: Effects on L2 oral production. In Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning, Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo (ed.), 44-68. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
7. Givon, Talmy (1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Dan I. Slobin (ed.), 1: 1008-1025. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Guiraud, Pierre (1954). Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
9. Iwashita, Noriko, Tim. MacNamara and Catherine Elder (2001). Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information-processing approach to task design. Language Learning 51: 401-436.
10. Kuiken, Folkert, Maria Mos and Ineke Vedder (2005). Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In Eurosla Yearbook 5, Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo and Jasone Cenoz (eds.), 195-222. Amsterdam.: John Benjamins.
11. Kuiken, Folkert and Ineke Vedder (2007). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning, Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo (ed.), 117-135. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
12. MacWhinney, Brian (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Mehnert, Uta (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 52-83.
14. Nuevo, Ana-Maria (2006). Task Complexity and Interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown, Georgetown University, U.S.A.
15. Pica, Teresa (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44: 493-527.
16. Rahimpour, Massoud (1997). Task Condition, Task Complexity, and Variation in L2 Discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.
17. Robinson, Peter (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning 45: 99-140.
18. _ (2001a). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 27-57.
19. _ (2001b). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, Peter Robinson (ed.), 287-318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. _ (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework, for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics 43: 1-32.
21. _ (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In Investigating Tasks in Formal Language. Learning, Maria del Pilar Garcia Mayo (ed.), 7-26. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
22. Schmidt, Richard (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 17-46.
23. _ (2001). Attention. In Cognition and Second Language Learning, Peter Robinson (ed.), 3-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Skehan, Peter and Pauline Foster (2001). Cognition and tasks. In Cognition and Second Language. Instruction, Peter Robinson (ed.), 183-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. _ (2005). Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, Rod Ellis (ed.), 193-218. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
26. Vermeer, Anne (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing 17 (1): 65-83.
27. Witte, Femmy and Froukje Mulder (eds.) (2006). Staatsexamen NT2 op de Arbeidsmarkt. Informatiebulletin over het diploma Nederlands als tweede taal in bedrijf en beroepsopleidingen [State Examination Dutch as a Second Language (NT2) on the Job Market. Information Bulletin about the Certificate NT2 in Business and Vocational Education] 18, Instituut voor Taalonderzoek en Taalonderwijs Anderstaligen. Retrieved April 18, 2007, from, the Expertise Centrum NT2 Web site: http://www.expert.isecentrumnt2.nl/staat/downloads/ NT2%20nr%2018%20-%2009- 2006.pdf.
28. Yuan, Fangyuan and Rod Ellis (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24 (1): 1-27.