Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 141-174

  Michel, Marije C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84974699235     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Cadierno, T. & Robinson, P. (2009). Language typology, task complexity and the acquisition of L2 lexicalization patterns for reference to motion. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 245–276.
2. Costa, A., Martin, J. P., & Sorace, A. (2008). Alignment in second language dialogue. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 528–556.
3. de Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.
4. Dörnyei, Z. & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication. A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning, 20(3), 349–385.
5. Ferrari, S. (2009). Valutare le competenze orali in italiano L2: Variazione longitudinale e situazionale in apprendenti a livello avanzato. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Università degli studi di Verona.
6. Fiksdal, S. (2000). Fluency as a function of time and rapport. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 128–140). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and Testing (pp. 75–93). Harlow: Longman.
8. Foster, P. & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896.
9. Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375.
10. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output. AILA Review, 19, 3–17.
11. Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 299–307.
12. Gilabert, R. (2007). Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 215–240.
13. Gilabert, R., Baron, J., & Llanes, M. (2009). Manipulating cognitive complexity across task types and its impact on learners’ interaction during oral performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(3–4), 367–395.
14. Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
15. Guiraud, P. (1954). Les caractères statistiques du vocabulaire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
16. Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(6), 236–242.
17. Jacobs, D. (2006). Scanner recorder 1.9. Computer Programm. Available from http://www.davee.com/scanrec/.
18. Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner-learner interaction. System, 37(2), 254–268.
19. Kormos, J. (2000). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Learning, 22(2), 145–167.
20. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 261–284.
21. Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Long, M. H. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interaction. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 8(2), 1–26.
23. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.
24. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Available from http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/.
25. Michel, M. C. (submitted). The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex L2 tasks.
26. Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241–259.
27. Navon, D. (1989). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 191–238.
28. Nuevo, A.-M. (2006). Task complexity and interaction. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Georgetown University.
29. Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.
30. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527.
31. Pickering, M., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–226.
32. Poulisse, N., & Bongaerts, T. (1994). First language use in second language production. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 36–57.
33. Révész, A. (in press). Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal.
34. Robinson, P. (1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse. Language Learning, 45(1), 99–145.
35. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57.
36. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.) The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631–678). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 1–32.
38. Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 193–213.
39. Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 161–176.
40. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 17–46.
41. Sink, C. H. & Stroh, H. R. (2006). Practical significance: The use of effect sizes in school counseling research. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcounselor.org/files/9-5-401%20Sink.pdf
42. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 167–185). Harlow: Longman.
44. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.) Cognition and second language learning (pp. 183–205). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2007). Complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing Research. In S. van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp. 207–226). Brussel: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten (KVAB).
46. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
47. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
48. Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and L2 performance. Language Learning, 58(2), 429–473.
49. Tavakoli, P. & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R.Ellis(Ed.),Planningandtaskperformanceinasecondlanguage(pp.239–273).Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attention to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 287–301.
51. Vermeer, A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17(1), 65–83.
52. Wickens, C. D. (1998). Attention and skilled performance. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 71–105). New York, NY: John Wiley.
53. Wickens, C. D. (2007). Attention to the second language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 177–191.