Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 218-233

  Ong, Justina ^a   Zhang, Lawrence Jun ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Chinese EFL student writers; Cognitive processing; Fluency; L2 writing quality; Lexical complexity; Task complexity

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049456653     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bereiter C., Scardamalia M. The psychology of written composition 1987, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Bialystok E. Metalinguistic dimensions of bilingual language proficiency. Language processing in bilingual children 1991, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 113-140. E. Bialystok (Ed.).
3. Bialystok E. Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1994, 16:157-168.
4. Bygate M. Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research 1999, 3:185-214.
5. Carter R. Mapping the mind 1998, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.
6. Crookes G. Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1989, 11:367-383.
7. DeKeyser R. Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1997, 19:195-211.
8. Elbow P. Writing without teachers 1973, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Elbow P. Writing with power 1981, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Ellis R. Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1987, 9:12-20.
11. Ellis R. Task-based language learning and teaching 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Ellis R. Planning and task performance in a second language 2005, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
13. Ellis R. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics 2009, 30:474-509.
14. Ellis R., Yuan F. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2004, 26:59-84.
15. Flower L.S., Hayes J.R. The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. Cognitive processes in writing 1980, 31-50. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L.W. Gregg, E.R. Steinberg (Eds.).
16. Foster P., Skehan P. The influence of planning and task type on second language performances. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1996, 18:299-323.
17. Galbraith D., Torrance M. Revision in the context of different drafting strategies. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes 2004, Vol. 13:63-85. Kluwer, Netherlands.
18. Gathercole S.E., Baddeley A.D. Working memory and language 1993, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Gilabert R. Effects of mainupulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:215-240.
20. Glynn S.M., Britton B.K., Muth K.D., Dogan N. Writing and revising persuasive documents: Cognitive demands. Journal of Educational Psychology 1982, 74:557-567.
21. Hayes J.R., Nash J.D. On the nature of planning in writing. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications 1996, 29-55. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C.M. Levy, S. Ransdell (Eds.).
22. Ishikawa T. The effect of manipulating task complexity along the (±Here-and -Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. Investigating tasks in formal language learning 2006, 136-156. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK. C.M. García-Mayo (Ed.).
23. Jacobs H.L., Zinkgraf S.A., Wormuth D.R., Hartfiel V.F., Hughey J.B. Testing EFL composition: A practical approach 1981, Newbury House, Rowley, MA.
24. Kellogg R.T. Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory and Cognition 1987, 15:256-266.
25. Kellogg R.T. Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:355-365.
26. Kellogg R.T. Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology 1990, 103:327-342.
27. Kellogg R.T. A model of working memory in writing. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications 1996, 57-72. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. C.M. Levy, S. Ransdell (Eds.).
28. Kirk R.E. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences 1995, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA. 3rd ed.
29. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. Investigating tasks in formal language learning 2006, 117-135. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK. M. García-Mayo (Ed.).
30. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:261-284.
31. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:48-60.
32. Kuiken F., Maria M., Vedder I. Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. Eurosla yearbook 2005, Vol. 5:195-222. Benjamins, Amsterdam.
33. Long M. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of second language acquisition 1996, 413-468. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. W. Ritchie, T. Bhatia (Eds.).
34. Manchón R.M., de Haan P. Writing in foreign language contexts: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:1-6.
35. Manchón R.M., Roca de Larios J. On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing. Language Learning 2007, 57:549-593.
36. Mehnert U. The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1998, 20:83-108.
37. Michel M.C., Kuiken F., Vedder I. The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:241-259.
38. Mochizuki N., Ortega L. Balancing communication and grammar in beginning-level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research 2008, 12:11-37.
39. Ojima M. Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System 2006, 34:566-585.
40. Ortega L. Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1999, 21:108-148.
41. Robinson P. Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. Cognition and second language instruction 2001, 287-318. Cambridge University Press, New York. P. Robinson (Ed.).
42. Robinson P. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 2001, 22:27-57.
43. Robinson P. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies 2003, 21:45-105.
44. Robinson P. Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review of studies in a Componential Framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2005, 43:1-33.
45. Robinson P. Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:193-213.
46. Robinson P., Gilabert R. Task complexity, the cognition hypothesis and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:161-176.
47. Schmidt R. Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1993, 13:206-226.
48. Schmidt R. Attention. Cognition and second language learning 2001, 3-32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Robinson (Ed.).
49. Skehan P. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 1996, 17:38-62.
50. Skehan P. A cognitive approach to language learning 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51. Skehan P. Tasks and language performance assessment. Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing 2001, 167-185. Pearson Education Longman, Harlow. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, M. Swain (Eds.).
52. Skehan P. Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 2003, 36:1-14.
53. Skehan P., Foster P. Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research 1997, 1:185-211.
54. Skehan P., Foster P. The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 1999, 49:93-120.
55. Skehan P., Foster P. Cognition and tasks. Cognition and second language instruction 2001, 183-205. Cambridge University Press, New York. P. Robinson (Ed.).
56. Skehan P., Foster P. Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. Planning and task performance in a second language 2005, 193-218. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R. Ellis (Ed.).
57. Suzuki, M. (2006). Negotiation processes and text changes in Japanese learners' self revisions and peer revisions of their written compositions in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
58. Tavakoli P., Foster P. Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning 2008, 58:439-473.
59. VanPatten B. Attention to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1990, 12:287-301.
60. Wang W., Wen Q. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 2002, 11:225-246.
61. Wickens C.D. Attention and skilled performance. Human skills 1989, 71-105. John Wiley, New York. D. Holding (Ed.).
62. Wickens C.D. Engineering psychology and human performance 1992, Harper Collins, New York.
63. Wigglesworth G. An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing 1997, 14:85-106.
64. Wolfe-Quintero K., Inagaki S., Kim H.-Y. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency accuracy and complexity 1998, University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu, HI.
65. Yuan F., Ellis R. The effects of pretask planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 2003, 24:1-27.
66. Zhang L.J. Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science 2008, 36:89-116.
67. Zhang L.J. A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students' knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly 2010, 44:320-353.