Colonoscopy: Quality indicators

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Anderson, Joseph C ^a   Butterly, Lynn F ^b,c  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CECAL INTUBATION; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE;

EID: 84927927809     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2155384X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2015.5     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 739-750.
2. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696.
3. Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 104-117.
4. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981.
5. Brenner H, Haug U, Arndt V et al. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 870-876.
6. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8.
7. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 22-30.
8. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1128-1137.
9. Mulder SA, van Soest EM, Dieleman JP et al. Exposure to colorectal examinations before a colorectal cancer diagnosis: a case-control study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22: 437-443.
10. Baxter NN, Warren JL, Barrett MJ et al. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 2664-2669.
11. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1288-1295.
12. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-1803.
13. Butterly L, Robinson CM, Anderson JC et al. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 417-426.
14. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Quality Measures Available at ohttp://www. cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/ index.html?redirect=/QUALITYMEASURES/4. Accessed 21 December.
15. Solad Y, Wang C, Laine L et al. Influence of colonoscopy quality measures on patients' colonoscopist selection. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 110: 215-219.
16. Jover R, Zapater P, Polania E et al. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 381-389 e1.
17. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Cancer USM-STFoCQuality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-1308.
18. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 169-174.
19. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-168.
20. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM et al. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 825-831.
21. Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 969-974.
22. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306.
23. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 81: 31-53.
24. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 656-665.
25. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Arai A et al. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1253-1259.
26. Imperiali G, Minoli G, Meucci GM et al. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 314-318.
27. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1335-1340.
28. Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN et al. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 219-226.
29. Ussui V, Coe S, Rizk C et al. Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Followup of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II. Am J Gastroenterol; advance online publication, 30 September 2014; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.314 [e-pub ahead of print].
30. Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS et al. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 925-931.
31. Greene MA, Butterly LF, Goodrich M et al. Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 334-340.
32. Francis DL, Rodriguez-Correa DT, Buchner A et al. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 493-497.
33. Boroff ES, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG et al. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 993-999.
34. Gohel TD, Burke CA, Lankaala P et al. Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 1137-1142.
35. Greenspan M, Rajan KB, Baig A et al. . Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate. The Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1286-1292.
36. Leung FW. PDR or ADR as a quality indicator for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1000-1002.
37. Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 376-380.
38. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Goodrich M et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1308-1312.
39. Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 71-78.
40. Fayad NF, Kahi CJ. Quality measures for colonoscopy: a critical evaluation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 12: 1973-1980.
41. Kahi CJ, Hewett DG, Norton DL et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 42-46.
42. Kahi CJ, Li X, Eckert GJ et al. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 515-520.
43. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102.
44. Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 09: 1375-1389.
45. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM et al. Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 950-960.
46. Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 721-731.
47. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. . Endoscopy AAToQi. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885.
48. Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR et al. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2784-2787.
49. Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 558-562.
50. Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut 2012; 61: 1050-1057.
51. Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y et al. Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 506-510.
52. Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 65-72.
53. de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, Cahen DL et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 98-106.
54. Rex DK. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 451-459.
55. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28.
56. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769-1772.
57. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541.
58. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-1098.
59. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time4or=7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1892-1898.
60. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2012; 62: 236-241.
61. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 965-971.
62. Butterly LF, Goodrich M, Onega T et al. Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk. Digest Dis Sci 2010; 55: 754-760.
63. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-79.
64. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1207-1214.
65. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-1203.
66. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations From the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1528-1545.
67. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-857.
68. Menees SB, Kim HM, Elliott EE et al. The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 510-516.
69. Sherer EA, Imler TD, Imperiale TF. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 545-553.
70. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM et al. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 463-470.
71. Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1714-1723.
72. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with systemwide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 603-608.
73. Enestvedt BK, Tofani C, Laine LA et al. 4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1225-1231.
74. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1240-1245.
75. Cavanagh MF, Lane DS, Messina CR et al. Clinical case management and navigation for colonoscopy screening in an academic medical center. Cancer 2013; 119(Suppl 15): 2894-2904.
76. Lane DS, Messina CR, Cavanagh MF et al. Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks. Cancer 2013; 119 (Suppl 15): 2842-2848.