Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 656-665

  Corley, Douglas A ^a   Jensen, Christopher D ^a   Marks, Amy R ^a  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYPOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; DEFECATION HABIT; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80052265586     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.017     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and E. Ward Cancer statistics, 2009 CA Cancer J Clin 59 2009 225 249
2. B. Levin, D.A. Lieberman, and B. McFarland Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin 58 2008 130 160 (Pubitemid 351830299)
3. O.S. Lin, R.A. Kozarek, and D.B. Schembre Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy JAMA 295 2006 2357 2365 (Pubitemid 43788103)
4. J. Regula, M. Rupinski, and E. Kraszewska Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia N Engl J Med 355 2006 1863 1872 (Pubitemid 44664644)
5. P. Schoenfeld, B. Cash, and A. Flood Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia N Engl J Med 352 2005 2061 2068 (Pubitemid 40664307)
6. H. Strul, R. Kariv, and M. Leshno The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 255 262 (Pubitemid 43381664)
7. L.C. Seeff, T.B. Richards, and J.A. Shapiro How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity Gastroenterology 127 2004 1670 1677 (Pubitemid 39575845)
8. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, and T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 873 885
9. J. Church Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges Dis Colon Rectum 51 2008 520 523
10. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, and E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
11. D.K. Rex, D.G. Hewett, and D.C. Snover Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2665 2669
12. L.J. Hixson, M.B. Fennerty, and R.E. Sampliner Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy J Natl Cancer Inst 82 1990 1769 1772
13. D.K. Rex, C.S. Cutler, and G.T. Lemmel Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Gastroenterology 112 1997 24 28 (Pubitemid 27008981)
14. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, and J. Stoker Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350 (Pubitemid 43381678)
15. W. Atkin, P. Rogers, and C. Cardwell Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy Gastroenterology 126 2004 1247 1256 (Pubitemid 38552789)
16. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, and A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
17. M. Bretthauer, E. Skovlund, and T. Grotmol Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer Scand J Gastroenterol 38 2003 1268 1274 (Pubitemid 38096086)
18. S.C. Chen, and D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861 (Pubitemid 46496608)
19. W. Sanchez, G.C. Harewood, and B.T. Petersen Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1941 1945 (Pubitemid 39421236)
20. B. Bressler, L.F. Paszat, and C. Vinden Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 127 2004 452 456 (Pubitemid 39091893)
21. O. Hosokawa, S. Shirasaki, and Y. Kaizaki Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer Endoscopy 35 2003 506 510 (Pubitemid 36705642)
22. M. Leaper, M.J. Johnston, and M. Barclay Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy Endoscopy 36 2004 499 503 (Pubitemid 38811617)
23. R.E. Schoen, P.F. Pinsky, and J.L. Weissfeld Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination JAMA 290 2003 41 48 (Pubitemid 37432864)
24. P.J. Pickhardt, P.A. Nugent, and P.A. Mysliwiec Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy Ann Intern Med 141 2004 352 359
25. D.J. Cook, C.D. Mulrow, and R.B. Haynes Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions Ann Intern Med 126 1997 376 380 (Pubitemid 27102522)
26. C.D. Mulrow, D.J. Cook, and F. Davidoff Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence Ann Intern Med 126 1997 389 391
27. G.C. Harewood, J. Leyden, and F.E. Murray Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the Effect Trial [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 67 2008 AB294
28. D.K. Rex, T.F. Imperiale, and D.R. Latinovich Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1696 1700 (Pubitemid 34761391)
29. J. Velasquez, J. Espinoza-Rios, and J. Huerta-Mercado Impact assessment of increasing the time of withdrawal of colonoscopy in the detection rate of polyps in our midst Rev Gastroenterol Peru 29 2009 321 325
30. A. Taber, and J. Romagnuolo Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 782 786
31. S. Li, M. Spencer, and A. Perkins Recording colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenomatous polyp detection rate: a single practitioner study [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 105 Suppl 1 2010 S133
32. S. Li, M. Spencer, and A. Perkins The indication for colonoscopy significantly impacts the polyp detection rate when measuring the withdraw time [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 105 Suppl 1 2010 S134
33. D. Valencia, M. Metwally, and V. Ciofoaia The impact of timed colonoscopy withdrawal on adenoma detection rates at a community hospital [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 105 Suppl 1 2010 S568
34. K. Weiser, A. Toor, and P. Anderson 'Time to change': utilization of monitor mounted timers to improve withdrawal time during the performance of colonoscopy [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 103 Suppl 1s 2008 S194 S195
35. A. Saini, P. Bekal, and A. Safdi Effect of real-time visual feedback on adenoma detection rate [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 104 Suppl 3 2009 S530
36. O.S. Lin, R.A. Kozarek, and A. Arai The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 1253 1259
37. M.S. Sawhney, M.S. Cury, and N. Neeman Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection Gastroenterology 135 2008 1892 1898
38. B.S. Hall, M.E. Benson, and P. Pfau Improved adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit following department colonoscopy assessment [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 AB107 AB108
39. D. Ramasamy, R. Samavedy, and D.J. Geenen Analysis of colonoscopy withdrawal time and detection of adenomatous colon polyp in a high volume private practice endocenter [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 67 2008 AB305
40. J. Yuan, J. Mellen, and B. Cooper How will the efficiency of colonoscopy change with an enhanced emphasis on adenoma detection? [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 105 Suppl 1 2010 S561 S562
41. J. Mellen, J. Yuan, and B. Cooper Can feedback regarding adenoma detection rates substantially enhance colonoscopy performance? [abstract] Am J Gastroenterol 105 Suppl 1 2010 S561
42. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, and R.L. Greenlaw Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 1091 1098
43. G. Imperiali, G. Minoli, and G.M. Meucci Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice Endoscopy 39 2007 314 318 (Pubitemid 46605929)
44. A. Shaukat, C. Oancea, and J.H. Bond Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 2009 1335 1340
45. K. Leonard, and M.C. Masatu Outpatient process quality evaluation and the Hawthorne Effect Soc Sci Med 63 2006 2330 2340 (Pubitemid 44399810)
46. R. McCarney, J. Warner, and S. Iliffe The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial BMC Med Res Methodol 7 2007 30
47. D.K. Rex Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 33 36 (Pubitemid 30051607)
48. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, and S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
49. M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw, and A. Walker Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings J Clin Epidemiol 58 2005 107 112 (Pubitemid 40174916)
50. L.A. Bero, R. Grilli, and J.M. Grimshaw Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group BMJ 317 1998 465 468 (Pubitemid 28368041)
51. A.D. Oxman, M.A. Thomson, and D.A. Davis No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice CMAJ 153 1995 1423 1431
52. J.M. Grimshaw, L. Shirran, and R. Thomas Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions Med Care 39 8 Suppl 2 2001 II2 II45
53. J.M. Grimshaw, R.E. Thomas, and G. MacLennan Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies Health Technol Assess 8 2004 iii iv 1-72
54. M.P. Eccles, M. Johnston, and S. Hrisos Translating clinicians' beliefs into implementation interventions (TRACII): a protocol for an intervention modeling experiment to change clinicians' intentions to implement evidence-based practice Implement Sci 2 2007 27
55. P. Davies, A. Walker, and J. Grimshaw Theories of behaviour change in studies of guideline implementation Proc Br Psychol Soc 11 2003 120
56. D.A. Davis, and A. Taylor-Vaisey Translating guidelines into practice A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines CMAJ 157 1997 408 416 (Pubitemid 27384745)
57. G. Jamtvedt, J.M. Young, and D.T. Kristoffersen Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2006 CD000259
58. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health 2000 Medical Research Council Health Services and Public Health Research Board London
59. S. Hrisos, M. Eccles, and M. Johnston Developing the content of two behavioural interventions: using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #1 BMC Health Serv Res 8 2008 11
60. D.K. Rex, D.G. Hewett, and M. Raghavendra The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2312 2317
61. M.B. Robinson Evaluation of medical audit J Epidemiol Community Health 48 1994 435 440 (Pubitemid 24313744)
62. C. Hassan, P.J. Pickhardt, and D.K. Rex Performance improvements of imaging-based screening tests Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24 2010 493 507
63. J. Sauk, A. Hoffman, and S. Anandasabapathy High-definition and filter-aided colonoscopy Gastroenterol Clin North Am 39 2010 859 881
64. S.R. Brown, W. Baraza, and P. Hurlstone Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4 2007 CD006439
65. D.K. Rex Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 2866 2877 (Pubitemid 44902662)
66. F.J. van den Broek, J.B. Reitsma, and W.L. Curvers Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos) Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 124 135
67. S.J. Chung, D. Kim, and J.H. Song Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates Gastrointest Endosc 72 2010 136 142
68. M. Atkinson, and A. Chak I-Scan: chromoendoscopy without the hassle? Dig Liver Dis 42 2010 18 19
69. M.B. Wallace Improving colorectal adenoma detection: technology or technique? Gastroenterology 132 2007 1221 1223 (Pubitemid 46627618)