An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 219-226

  Coe, Susan G ^a   Crook, Julia E ^a   Diehl, Nancy N ^a   Wallace, Michael B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ENDOSCOPIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORK EXPERIENCE;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; OPERATIVE TIME; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84873568771     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.417     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O et al. Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011 caac. 20121.
2. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 739-50.
3. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J. et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: A systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101 : 343-50. (Pubitemid 43381678)
4. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: A prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 284-90. (Pubitemid 351524375)
5. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers aft er colonoscopy and their risk factors: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 96-102. (Pubitemid 46108740)
6. Chen SC, Rex DK. Variable Detection of Nonadenomatous Polyps by Individual Endoscopists at Colonoscopy and Correlation With Adenoma Detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 704-7 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31817236e5.
7. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8.
8. Baxter NN, Sutradhar R, Forbes SS et al. Analysis of administrative data fi nds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 65-72.
9. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
10. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1335-40.
11. Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Digest Dis Sci 2010; 55: 166-71.
12. Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected aft er colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 858-64.
13. Kaneshiro M, Ho A, Chan M et al. Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social infl uence theory to reverse the trend. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1233-40.
14. Long MD, Martin C, Sandler RS et al. Reduced polyp detection as endoscopy shift progresses: Experience with screening colonoscopy at a tertiarycare hospital. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 253-8.
15. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-9. (Pubitemid 38208751)
16. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J - J et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-84. (Pubitemid 40349029)
17. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 856-61. (Pubitemid 46496608)
18. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 33-6. (Pubitemid 30051607)
19. Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 128-34.
20. Harris PA, Taylor R, Th ielke R et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workfl ow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomedical Informat 2009; 42: 377-81.
21. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al. High-defi nition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 364-70.
22. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N et al. Eff ect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 min on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1892-8.
23. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Eff ect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-8.
24. Lambert R, Kudo SE, Vieth M et al. Pragmatic classification of superficial neoplastic colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70 : 1182-99.
25. Endoscopic Classifi cation Review G. Update on the paris classifi cation of superfi cial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 2005; 37 : 570-8.
26. Kudo SE, Lambert R, Allen JI. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: S3-47.
27. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (fl at and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008; 299: 1027-35. (Pubitemid 351347059)
28. Gorgun E, Church J. Flat adenomas of the large bowel: A single endoscopist study. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 972-7.
29. Hetzel J, Huang CS, Coukos JA. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 105, 2656-64.
30. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliff e S et al. The Hawthorne Eff ect: A randomised, controlled trial. BMC Medical Res Methodol 2007; 7: 30.
31. Harewood GC, Petersen BT, Ott BJ. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Th er 2006; 24: 313-8. (Pubitemid 43972899)
32. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Arai A et al. The eff ect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1253-9.
33. Imperiali G, Minoli G, Meucci GM et al. Eff ectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 314-8. (Pubitemid 46605929)