Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: Development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 334-340

  Greene, Mary Ann ^a   Butterly, Lynn F ^b   Goodrich, Martha ^a   Onega, Tracy ^a   Baron, John A ^a   Lieberman, David A ^c   Dietrich, Allen J ^a   Srivastava, Amitabh ^b  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; ADR; colorectal cancer; CRC; New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry; NHCR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; DISEASE REGISTRY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT INFORMATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; NEW HAMPSHIRE; REGISTRIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960942625     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1250     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Meza R, Jeon J, Renehan AG, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States and United Kingdom: evidence of right- to left-sided biological gradients with implications for screening. Cancer Res 2010;70:5419-29.
2. Chen X, White MC, Peipins LA, et al. Increase in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1511-6.
3. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:89-95.
4. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739-50.
5. Sedjo RL, Byers T, Barrera E, Jr., et al.Amidpoint assessment of the American Cancer Society challenge goal to decrease cancer incidence by25% between 1992 and 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:326-40. (Pubitemid 350234399)
6. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;34:414-20. (Pubitemid 29232378)
7. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81. (Pubitemid 24015040)
8. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:143-59; quiz 84-5.
9. Kristjansdottir S, Jonasson JG, Cariglia N, et al. Colonic adenomas found via colonoscopy: yield and risk factors for high-grade dysplasia. Digestion 2010;82:252-7.
10. Kulling D, Christ AD, Karaaslan N, et al. The presence of more than two index adenomas is the strongest predictor of metachronous colon adenomas. Swiss Med Wkly 2002;132:139-42. (Pubitemid 34578738)
11. O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990;98:371-9. (Pubitemid 20037919)
12. Saini SD, Kim HM, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:614-26. (Pubitemid 44419414)
13. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
14. Church J. Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:520-3.
15. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
16. Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1217-20.
17. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
18. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
19. Carney P, Butterly L, Goodrich M, et al. Design and development of a population-based colonoscopy registry. J Registry Manag 2006;33:91-9.
20. Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:492-6. (Pubitemid 28018542)
21. Logan JR, Lieberman DA. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010;20:717-34.
22. Dreyer NA, Garner S. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA 2009;302:790-1.
23. Butterly LF, Goodrich M, Onega T, et al. Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:754-60.
24. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130-60. (Pubitemid 351830299)