Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 108, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1286-1292

  Greenspan, Michael ^a   Rajan, Kumar Bharat ^a   Baig, Adil ^a   Beck, Todd ^a   Mobarhan, Sohrab ^a   Melson, Joshua ^a  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADENOMA; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COHORT STUDIES; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84881192186     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.149     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O ' Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-96.
2. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41.
3. Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A et al. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:166-71.
4. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C et al. Tailoring colorectal cancer screening by considering risk of advanced proximal neoplasia. Am J Med 2012;125:1181-7.
5. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron Thet al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
6. Kaminski M, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
7. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ et al. United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance aft er screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012;143:844-57.
8. Mart í nez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses aft er colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009;136:832-41.
9. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV et al. Five-year colon surveillance aft er screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2007;133:1077-85.
10. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002;12:1-9, v.
11. Church J. Adenoma detection rate and the quality of colonoscopy: the sword has two edges. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:520-30.
12. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
13. Song P. Correlated Data Analysis, 1st edn. Springer Series: New York, NY, 2007.
14. Shen D. Computation of correlation coeffi cient and its confi dence interval in SAS. SAS users general proceedings paper, SUGI 31, Paper: 170-31, 2006.
15. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101 : 343-50.
16. Ferr á ndez A, Navarro M, D í ez M et al. Risk factors for advanced lesions undetected at prior colonoscopy: not always poor preparation. Endoscopy 2010;42:1071-6.
17. Ahlquist DA. Molecular detection of colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2010;138:2127-39.
18. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E et al. Colonoscopy in colorectalcancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1863-72.
19. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroeneterol 2007;102:856-61.
20. Din FV, Theodoratou E, Farrington SM et al. Eff ect of aspirin and NSAIDs on risk and survival from colorectal cancer. Gut 2010;59:1670-9.
21. Sherer EA, Imler TD, Imperiale TF. The eff ect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:545-53.
22. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated wiThearly repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207-14.
23. Schoen RE, Gerber LD, Margulies C. The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:492-6.
24. Rex DK. Endoscopists, polyp size, and post-polypectomy surveillance: making a mountain out of a molehill? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:571-4.
25. Gopalswamy N, Shenoy VN, Choudhry U et al. Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:497-502.
26. Eichenseer PJ, Dhanekula R, Jakate S et al. Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:315-21.