Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 71-78

  Wang, Hank S ^a,b,c,d   Pisegna, Joseph ^a,b,d   Modi, Rusha ^e   Liang, Li Jung ^b   Atia, Mary ^e   Nguyen, Minh ^e   Cohen, Hartley ^a   Ohning, Gordon ^a,b,d   Van Oijen, Martijn ^b   Spiegel, Brennan M R ^a,b,c,d  

^a VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; ADR; colorectal cancer; CRC; West Los Angeles Veterans Administration; WLAVA

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84871276616     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.038     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. D. Lieberman Screening/early detection model for colorectal cancer Why screen? Cancer 74 1994 2023 2027
2. I.C. Lawrance, C. Sherrington, K. Murray Poor correlation between clinical impression, the small colonic polyp and their neoplastic risk J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 2006 563 568
3. M.J. O'Brien, S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber The National Polyp Study Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas Gastroenterology 98 1990 371 379
4. M. Risio The natural history of adenomas Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24 2010 271 280
5. S. Winawer, R. Fletcher, D. Rex Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence Gastroenterology 124 2003 544 560
6. D. Rex, D. Johnson, J. Anderson American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 739 750
7. R.E. Davila, E. Rajan, T.H. Baron ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 546 557
8. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308
9. M.Y. Chan, H. Cohen, B.M. Spiegel Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veteran's Administration teaching hospital Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 2009 1217 1223
10. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541
11. J.N. Rogart, U.D. Siddiqui, P.A. Jamidar Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 103 2008 2841 2846
12. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
13. A. Cameron, P. Trivedi Regression analysis of count data 1998 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
14. J.E. Williams, D.O. Faigel Colonoscopy reports and current state of performance measures Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20 2010 685 697