Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 98-106

  De Jonge, Vincent ^a   Sint Nicolaas, Jerome ^a   Cahen, Djuna L ^a,b   Moolenaar, Willem ^c   Ouwendijk, Rob J Th ^d   Tang, Thjon J ^e   Van Tilburg, Antonie J P ^f   Kuipers, Ernst J ^a   Van Leerdam, Monique E ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Amstell and Hospital   (Netherlands)

^c Location Alkmaar   (Netherlands)

^d IKAZIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology   (Netherlands)

^f SINT FRANCISCUS GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CECUM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNIST; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NURSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDATION; SURGEON;

ADULT; AGED; CECUM; COLONOSCOPY; DEEP SEDATION; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH REPORT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84855178315     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.032     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. D.J. Bjorkman, J.W. Popp Jr Measuring the quality of endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S1 S2
2. D.O. Faigel, I.M. Pike, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S3 S9
3. B. Levin, D.A. Lieberman, B. McFarland American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory G, Force USM-ST, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer C Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology CA Cancer J Clin 58 2008 130 160 (Pubitemid 351830299)
4. B. Armstrong, R. Hollingworth Endoscopy and quality assurance-it is here! Can J Gastroenterol 21 2007 255 256
5. R. Valori, J. Sint Nicolaas, V. De Jonge Quality assurance of endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24 2010 451 464
6. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S16 S28
7. D. Lieberman, M. Nadel, R.A. Smith Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable MB Gastrointest Endosc 65 2007 757 766 (Pubitemid 46629071)
8. A. Crispin, B. Birkner, A. Munte Process quality and incidence of acute complications in a series of more than 230,000 outpatient colonoscopies Endoscopy 41 2009 1018 1025
9. F. Aslinia, L. Uradomo, A. Steele Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 721 731
10. J.E. Ball, J. Osbourne, S. Jowett Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study BMJ 329 2004 665 667 (Pubitemid 39279288)
11. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, B.E. Juliar Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
12. G. Imperiali, G. Minoli, G.M. Meucci Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice Endoscopy 39 2007 314 318 (Pubitemid 46605929)
13. D.J. Robertson, L.B. Lawrence, N.J. Shaheen Quality of colonoscopy reporting: a process of care study Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 2651 2656
14. J.S. Baudet, D. Diaz-Bethencourt, J. Aviles Minor adverse events of colonoscopy on ambulatory patients: the impact of moderate sedation Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 2009 656 661
15. L.B. Cohen Sedation issues in quality colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20 2010 615 627
16. D.A. Lieberman, D.O. Faigel, J.R. Logan Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 645 653
17. J.B. Marshall, D.N. Brown Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree? Gastrointest Endosc 44 1996 243 248 (Pubitemid 26318323)
18. D.K. Rex Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 451 459 (Pubitemid 30204766)
19. J. Li, M.R. Nadel, C.F. Poppell Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program Diagn Ther Endosc 2010 Sep 28 Epub
20. L.B. Palmer, D.H. Abbott, N. Hamilton Quality of colonoscopy reporting in community practice Gastrointest Endosc 72 2010 321 327 327.e1
21. F. Froehlich, V. Wietlisbach, J.J. Gonvers Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 378 384 (Pubitemid 40349029)
22. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
23. M.S. Sawhney, M.S. Cury, N. Neeman Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection Gastroenterology 135 2008 1892 1898
24. Z.F. Gellad, D.G. Weiss, D.J. Ahnen Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: results from VA Cooperative Studies Program 380 Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1746 1752
25. R.E. Schoen, L.D. Gerber, C. Margulies The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate Gastrointest Endosc 46 1997 492 496 (Pubitemid 28018542)
26. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
27. M.S. Millan, P. Gross, E. Manilich Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy Dis Colon Rectum 51 2008 1217 1220
28. C.J. Bowles, R. Leicester, C. Romaya A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53 2004 277 283 (Pubitemid 38125519)
29. F. Radaelli, G. Meucci, G. Sgroi Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators Am J Gastroenterol 103 2008 1122 1130 (Pubitemid 351677976)
30. C.W. Ko, J.A. Dominitz, P. Green Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy Am J Med 123 2010 528 535
31. B. Bressler, L.F. Paszat, Z. Chen Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 132 2007 96 102 (Pubitemid 46108740)
32. B. Denis, A.M. Weiss, A. Peter Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28 2004 1245 1255 (Pubitemid 40070050)
33. K.M. Taylor, K. Arajs, T. Rouse Prospective audit of colonoscopy quality in Kent and Medway, UK Endoscopy 40 2008 291 295 (Pubitemid 351524376)
34. C.A. Doubeni, A.O. Laiyemo, G. Reed Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18 2009 2170 2175
35. M.E. Benson, M. Reichelderfer, A. Said Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit Dig Dis Sci 55 2010 166 171
36. M.J. Groenen, W. Hirs, H. Becker Gastrointestinal endoscopic terminology coding (GET-C): a WHO-approved extension of the ICD-10 Dig Dis Sci 52 2007 1004 1008 (Pubitemid 46486619)
37. M.J. Groenen, S. Ajodhia, J.Y. Wynstra A cost-benefit analysis of endoscopy reporting methods: handwritten, dictated and computerized Endoscopy 41 2009 603 609