Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 493-497

  Francis, Dawn L ^a   Rodriguez Correa, Daniel T ^b   Buchner, Anna ^c   Harewood, Gavin C ^d   Wallace, Michael ^e  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; adenoma to polyp detection rate quotient; ADR; APDRQ; colorectal cancer; CRC; PDR; polyp detection rate

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADENOMA TO POLYP DETECTION RATE QUOTIENT; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL AND STATISTICAL PROCEDURES; PHYSICIAN; POLYP DETECTION RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADENOMA; ALGORITHMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 79952056626     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ransohoff DF. How much does colonoscopy reduce colon cancer mortality? Ann Intern Med 2009;150:50-2.
2. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:96-102. (Pubitemid 46108740)
3. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1259-64. (Pubitemid 44512220)
4. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352-9.
5. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004;127:41-8. (Pubitemid 38962272)
6. Bretagne JF, Hamonic S, Piette C, et al. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:335-41.
7. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61. (Pubitemid 46496608)
8. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
9. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:965-71. (Pubitemid 44326377)
10. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84. (Pubitemid 40349029)
11. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76-9. (Pubitemid 38208751)
12. Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M, et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:255-62. (Pubitemid 43381664)
13. Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:1659-64; quiz 1665.
14. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5. (Pubitemid 39421236)
15. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
16. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
17. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
18. Chen SC, Rex DK. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:704-7.
19. Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA, et al. Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:2841-6.
20. Harewood GC, Petersen BT, Ott BJ. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:313-8. (Pubitemid 43972899)