Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 463-470

  Anderson, Joseph C ^a,b   Butterly, Lynn F ^b,c   Robinson, Christina M ^b   Goodrich, Martha ^b   Weiss, Julia E ^b  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Abbreviations; adenoma detection rate; ADR; BMI; body mass index; colorectal cancer; CRC; New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry; NHCR; SDR; serrated polyp detection rate

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE; UNITED STATES; ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

LAXATIVE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; AGED; CATHARTICS; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW HAMPSHIRE; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84906316372     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. B. Levin, D.A. Lieberman, and B. McFarland et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology Gastroenterology 134 2008 1570 1595
2. D.K. Rex, D.A. Johnson, and J.C. Anderson et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected] Am J Gastroenterol 104 2009 739 750
3. B. Lebwohl, F. Kastrinos, and M. Glick et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 1207 1214
4. R.V. Chokshi, C.E. Hovis, and T. Hollander et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 75 2012 1197 1203
5. Menees SB, Kim HM, Elliott EE, et al. The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. Epub 2013 May 2.
6. E.A. Sherer, T.D. Imler, and T.F. Imperiale The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates Gastrointest Endosc 75 2012 545 553
7. S. Ben-Horin, S. Bar-Meir, and B. Avidan The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 2680 2685
8. N.N. Baxter, M.A. Goldwasser, and L.F. Paszat et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer Ann Intern Med 150 2009 1 8
9. H. Brenner, M. Hoffmeister, and V. Arndt et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study J Natl Cancer Inst 102 2010 89 95
10. J.C. Anderson, P. Rangasamy, and T. Rustagi et al. Risk factors for sessile serrated adenomas J Clin Gastroenterol 45 2011 694 699
11. B. Bressler, L.F. Paszat, and Z. Chen et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 132 2007 96 102
12. D.L. Weaver, R.D. Rosenberg, and W.E. Barlow et al. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography Cancer 106 2006 732 742
13. L.F. Butterly, M. Goodrich, and T. Onega et al. Improving the quality of colorectal cancer screening: assessment of familial risk Dig Dis Sci 55 2010 754 760
14. M.A. Greene, L.F. Butterly, and M. Goodrich et al. Matching colonoscopy and pathology data in population-based registries: development of a novel algorithm and the initial experience of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 334 340
15. G.C. Harewood, V.K. Sharma, and P. de Garmo Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia Gastrointest Endosc 58 2003 76 79
16. E.J. Lai, A.H. Calderwood, and G. Doros et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 620 625
17. A. Rostom, and E. Jolicoeur Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 482 486
18. C.J. Kahi, D.G. Hewett, and D.L. Norton et al. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9 2011 42 46
19. H. Singh, D. Bay, and S. Ip et al. Pathological reassessment of hyperplastic colon polyps in a city-wide pathology practice: implications for polyp surveillance recommendations Gastrointest Endosc 76 2012 1003 1008
20. J.C. Anderson, and D.J. Robertson Serrated polyps misclassified: the value of looking back and the impact of looking forward Gastroenterology 144 2013 1564 1566 discussion 1566
21. W.J. Conover Practical nonparametric statistics 2nd ed. 1980 John Wiley & Sons, Inc New York
22. J.C. Anderson, L.F. Butterly, and M. Goodrich et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11 2013 1308 1312
23. S. Thomas-Gibson, P. Rogers, and S. Cooper et al. Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates Endoscopy 38 2006 456 460
24. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, and E. Kraszewska et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
25. T.R. de Wijkerslooth, E.M. Stoop, and P.M. Bossuyt et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time Gastrointest Endosc 77 2013 617 623
26. M.A. Arain, M. Sawhney, and S. Sheikh et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1189 1195
27. A.N. Burnett-Hartman, P.A. Newcomb, and A.I. Phipps et al. Colorectal endoscopy, advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated polyps: implications for proximal colon cancer Am J Gastroenterol 107 2012 1213 1219
28. J.C. Anderson, R. Attam, and Z. Alpern et al. Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in smokers Am J Gastroenterol 98 2003 2777 2783
29. J.C. Anderson, C.R. Messina, and F. Dakhllalah et al. Body mass index: a marker for significant colorectal neoplasia in a screening population J Clin Gastroenterol 41 2007 285 290