The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1253-1259

  Lin, Otto S ^a   Kozarek, Richard A ^a   Arai, Andrew ^a   Gluck, Michael ^a   Jiranek, Geoffrey C ^a   Kowdley, Kris V ^a   McCormick, Susan E ^a   Schembre, Drew B ^a   Soon, Maw Soan ^a   Dominitz, Jason A ^a  

^a VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; COLONIC POLYPS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FOLLOW UP; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME; UNITED STATES;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952913729     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Sonnenberg A., Amorosi S.L., Lacey M.J., et al. Patterns of endoscopy in the United States: analysis of data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Endoscopic Database. Gastrointest Endosc 67 (2008) 489-496
2. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 4 Suppl (2006) S16-S28
3. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
4. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
5. Lieberman D. Colonoscopy: as good as gold?. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 401-403
6. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
7. Lin O.S., Schembre D.B., Ayub K., et al. Patient satisfaction scores for endoscopic procedures: impact of a survey-collection method. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 775-781
8. Sanchez W., Harewood G.C., and Petersen B.T. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 1941-1945
9. Simmons D.T., Harewood G.C., Baron T.H., et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 (2006) 965-971
10. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 352-359
11. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 343-350
12. Chen S.C., and Rex D.K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 1-6
13. Yacavone R.F., Locke III G.R., Gostout C.J., et al. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 53 (2001) 703-710
14. Cohen L., Delaney P., and Boston P. Listening to the customer: implementing a patient satisfaction measurement system. Gastroenterol Nurs 17 (1994) 110-115
15. Denis B., Weiss A.M., Peter A., et al. Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28 (2004) 1245-1255
16. Mahajan R.J., Johnson J.C., and Marshall J.B. Predictors of patient cooperation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 24 (1997) 220-223
17. Pena L.R., Mardini H.E., and Nickl N.J. Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci 50 (2005) 1860-1871
18. Lalos A.T., Hovanec-Lalos C.A., and Weber B. Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for ambulatory colonoscopy in a community hospital. Gastroenterol Nurs 20 (1997) 114-117
19. Schutz S.M., Lee J.G., Schmitt C.M., et al. Clues to patient dissatisfaction with conscious sedation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 89 (1994) 1476-1479
20. Cohen G. Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. Soc Sci Med 42 (1996) 1085-1093
21. Harewood G.C., Petersen B.T., and Ott B.J. Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 (2006) 313-318
22. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., and Greenlaw R.L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 (2008) 1091-1098
23. Sawhney M.S., Cury M.S., Neeman N., et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1892-1898