Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 376-380

  Do, Albert ^a   Weinberg, Janice ^b   Kakkar, Aarti ^c   Jacobson, Brian C ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Hallmark Health Medical Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOMA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84873738362     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. S. Winawer, R. Fletcher, D. Rex Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence Gastroenterology 124 2003 544 560
2. A.G. Zauber, S.J. Winawer, M.J. O'Brien Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths N Engl J Med 366 2012 687 696
3. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
4. D.A. Lieberman, D.G. Weiss, J.H. Bond Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 343 2000 162 168
5. A. Pabby, R.E. Schoen, J.L. Weissfeld Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 385 391
6. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308
7. D.J. Robertson, E.R. Greenberg, M. Beach Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance Gastroenterology 129 2005 34 41
8. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, J. Stoker Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350
9. S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber, M.N. Ho Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy N Engl J Med 329 1993 1977 1981
10. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541
11. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 873 885
12. P. Schoenfeld, B. Cash, A. Flood Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia N Engl J Med 352 2005 2061 2068
13. B. Denis, E.A. Sauleau, I. Gendre Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 1325 1336
14. T.J.W. Lee, M.D. Rutter, R.G. Blanks Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Gut 61 2012 1050 1057
15. J.F. Bretagne, S. Hamonic, C. Piette Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 335 341
16. S.C. Chen, D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861
17. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, B.E. Juliar Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
18. A. Shaukat, C. Oancea, J.H. Bond Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 2009 1335 1340
19. D.T. Simmons, G.C. Harewood, T.H. Baron Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 2006 965 971
20. W. Atkin, P. Rogers, C. Cardwell Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy Gastroenterology 126 2004 1247 1256
21. A. Kakkar, B. Jacobson Internet-based education and "Physician Compare" websites may discriminate against older and disadvantaged patient populations [abstract] Gastroenterology 140 Suppl 1 2011 S722
22. B. Rosner Fundamentals of biostatistics 4th ed. 1995 Wadsworth Belmont (Calif)
23. D.G. Hewett, D.K. Rex Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1925 1933
24. D.K. Rex Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication Am J Gastroenterol 90 1995 353 365
25. N.N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, S.S. Forbes Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 140 2011 65 72
26. J.F. Bretagne, T. Ponchon Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy 40 2008 523 528
27. J.E. Williams, T.D. Le, D.O. Faigel Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 498 506