Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 489-496

  Ussui, Vivian ^a   Coe, Susan ^a,b   Rizk, Cynthia ^a,c   Crook, Julia E ^a   Diehl, Nancy N ^a   Wallace, Michael B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Atlanta Gastroenterology Associ   (United States)

^c PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIST; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; ADULT; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS;

ADENOMA; ADULT; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84927789042     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.314     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy the National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-81.
2. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC. et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 739-50.
3. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-96.
4. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
5. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-8.
6. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N. et al. effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time>or=7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1892-8.
7. Rex DK, Hewett DG, Snover DC. Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2665-9.
8. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates?. A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 656-65.
9. Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN. et al. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 219-26. quiz 227
10. Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A. et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 376-80.
11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Th ielke R. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workfl ow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Infomatics 2009; 42: 377-81.
12. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B. et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60.
13. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH. et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1335-40.
14. Wang HS, Pisegna J, Modi R. et al. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insuffi cient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 71-8.
15. Lee TJW, Blanks RG, Rees CJ. et al. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 20-26.
16. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63 (Suppl 4): S16-S28.
17. Kahi CJ, Ballard D, Shah AS. et al. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 925-31.
18. Aslanian HR, Shieh FK, Chan FW. et al. Nurse observation during colonoscopy increases polyp detection: a randomized prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 166-72.
19. Kim TS, Park DI, Lee do Y. et al. Endoscopy nurse participation may increase the polyp detection rate by second-year fellows during screening colonoscopies. Gut Liver 2012; 6: 344-8.
20. Lee CK, Park DI, Lee SH. et al. Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1094-102.
21. Allen JI. Quality assurance for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28: 442-50.
22. Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M. et al the impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2312-7.
23. Armstrong D, Hollingworth R, Macintosh D. et al. Point-of-care, peercomparator colonoscopy practice audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program-Endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 13-20.
24. Coriat R, Lecler A, Lamarque D. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy procedures: a prospective multicentre method for endoscopy units. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33957.
25. Francis DL, Rodriguez-Correa DT, Buchner A. et al. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 493-7.
26. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8.
27. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM. et al. Protection from colorectal cancer aft er colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154: 22-30
28. Lasisi F, Rex DK. Improving protection against proximal colon cancer by colonoscopy. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 5: 745-54.
29. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG. et al. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1223-31.
30. Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB. et al. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 439-42.
31. Burke CA, Snover DC. Editorial: sessile serrated adenomas and their pit patterns: we must fi rst see the forest through the trees. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 470-2.
32. Hetzel JT, Huang CS, Coukos JA. et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2656-64.
33. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D. et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12, 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013; 62: 236-41.
34. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T. et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1197-203.
35. Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Harrison ME. et al. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 603-608, e601.
36. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. et al. Physician adenoma detection rate variability and subsequent colorectal cancer risk following a negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: S2-S3.
37. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-306.