The energy landscape of adenylate kinase during catalysis

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 124-131

  Kerns, S Jordan ^a,b   Agafonov, Roman V ^a   Cho, Young Jin ^a,c   Pontiggia, Francesco ^a   Otten, Renee ^a   Pachov, Dimitar V ^a   Kutter, Steffen ^a   Phung, Lien A ^a   Murphy, Padraig N ^a   Thai, Vu ^a,d   Alber, Tom ^e   Hagan, Michael F ^a   Kern, Dorothee ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Daegu Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENYLATE KINASE; ARGININE;

AQUIFEX AEOLICUS; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROLYSIS; LANDSCAPE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; STATIC ELECTRICITY; STEADY STATE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; METABOLISM; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ADENYLATE KINASE; BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR;

EID: 84926377721     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2941     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Westheimer, F.H. Why nature chose phosphates. Science 235, 1173-1178 (1987).
2. Bowler, M.W., Cliff, M.J., Waltho, J.P. & Blackburn, G.M. Why did nature select phosphate for its dominant roles in biology? New J. Chem. 34, 784-794 (2010).
3. Schroeder, G.K., Lad, C., Wyman, P., Williams, N.H. & Wolfenden, R. The time required for water attack at the phosphorus atom of simple phosphodiesters and of DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4052-4055 (2006).
4. Kamerlin, S.C., Sharma, P.K., Prasad, R.B. & Warshel, A. Why nature really chose phosphate. Q. Rev. Biophys. 46, 1-132 (2013).
5. Lassila, J.K., Zalatan, J.G. & Herschlag, D. Biological phosphoryl-transfer reactions: understanding mechanism and catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 669-702 (2011).
6. Stockbridge, R.B. & Wolfenden, R. The intrinsic reactivity of ATP and the catalytic proficiencies of kinases acting on glucose, N-acetylgalactosamine, and homoserine: a thermodynamic analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 22747-22757 (2009).
7. Jencks, W.P. Catalysis in chemistry and enzymology (Dover, New York, 1987).
8. Knowles, J.R. Enzyme-catalyzed phosphoryl transfer reactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 877-919 (1980).
9. Cleland, W.W. & Hengge, A.C. Enzymatic mechanisms of phosphate and sulfate transfer. Chem. Rev. 106, 3252-3278 (2006).
10. Thatcher, G.R.J. & Kluger, R. Mechanism and catalysis of nucleophilic-substitution in phosphate-esters. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 25, 99-265 (1989).
11. Hunter, T. Tyrosine phosphorylation: thirty years and counting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 140-146 (2009).
12. Jura, N. et al. Catalytic control in the EGF receptor and its connection to general kinase regulatory mechanisms. Mol. Cell 42, 9-22 (2011).
13. Adams, J.A. Kinetic and catalytic mechanisms of protein kinases. Chem. Rev. 101, 2271-2290 (2001).
14. Endicott, J.A., Noble, M.E. & Johnson, L.N. The structural basis for control of eukaryotic protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 587-613 (2012).
15. Henzler-Wildman, K., Lei, M., Thai, V., Karplus, M. & Kern, D. A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 450, 913-916 (2007).
16. Masterson, L.R. et al. Dynamics connect substrate recognition to catalysis in protein kinase A. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 821-828 (2010).
17. Mukherjee, K., Sharma, M., Jahn, R., Wahl, M.C. & Sudhof, T.C. Evolution of CASK into a Mg2+-sensitive kinase. Sci. Signal. 3, ra33 (2010).
18. Bao, Z.Q., Jacobsen, D.M. & Young, M.A. Briefly bound to activate: transient binding of a second catalytic magnesium activates the structure and dynamics of CDK2 kinase for catalysis. Structure 19, 675-690 (2011).
19. Tan, Y.W., Hanson, J.A. & Yang, H. Direct Mg2+ binding activates adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 3306-3313 (2009).
20. Bhabha, G. et al. Divergent evolution of protein conformational dynamics in dihydrofolate reductase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1243-1249 (2013).
21. Bhabha, G. et al. A dynamic knockout reveals that conformational fluctuations influence the chemical step of enzyme catalysis. Science 332, 234-238 (2011).
22. st century: is dynamics the missing link for understanding enzyme catalysis? Proteins 78, 1339-1375 (2010).
23. Adamczyk, A.J., Cao, J., Kamerlin, S.C. & Warshel, A. Catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase and other enzymes arises from electrostatic preorganization, not conformational motions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14115-14120 (2011).
24. st century revisionist's view at a turning point in enzymology. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 543-550 (2009).
25. Klinman, J.P. & Kohen, A. Hydrogen tunneling links protein dynamics to enzyme catalysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 471-496 (2013).
26. Müller, C.W., Schlauderer, G.J., Reinstein, J. & Schulz, G.E. Adenylate kinase motions during catalysis: an energetic counterweight balancing substrate binding. Structure 4, 147-156 (1996).
27. Müller, C.W. & Schulz, G.E. Structure of the complex between adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli and the inhibitor Ap5a refined at 1.9 Å resolution: a model for a catalytic transition-state. J. Mol. Biol. 224, 159-177 (1992).
28. Berry, M.B., Bae, E.Y., Bilderback, T.R., Glaser, M. & Phillips, G.N. Crystal structure of ADP/AMP complex of Escherichia coli adenylate kinase. Proteins 62, 555-556 (2006).
29. Berry, M.B. et al. The closed conformation of a highly flexible protein: the structure of Escherichia coli adenylate kinase with bound AMP and AMPPNP. Proteins 19, 183-198 (1994).
30. Cowan, J.A. Metal activation of enzymes in nucleic acid biochemistry. Chem. Rev. 98, 1067-1088 (1998).
31. Kladova, A.V. et al. Cobalt-, zinc- and iron-bound forms of adenylate kinase (AK) from the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio gigas: purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 65, 926-929 (2009).
32. Wittinghofer, A. Signaling mechanistics: aluminum fluoride for molecule of the year. Curr. Biol. 7, R682-R685 (1997).
33. Coleman, D.E. et al. Structures of active conformations of Gi alpha 1 and the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. Science 265, 1405-1412 (1994).
34. Sondek, J., Lambright, D.G., Noel, J.P., Hamm, H.E. & Sigler, P.B. GTPase mechanism of Gproteins from the 1.7-Å crystal structure of transducin ±-GDP AIF-4. Nature 372, 276-279 (1994).
35. Cliff, M.J. et al. Transition state analogue structures of human phosphoglycerate kinase establish the importance of charge balance in catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6507-6516 (2010).
36. Baxter, N.J. et al. Atomic details of near-transition state conformers for enzyme phosphoryl transfer revealed by rather than by phosphoranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4555 (2010).
37. Baxter, N.J. et al. Anionic charge is prioritized over geometry in aluminum and magnesium fluoride transition state analogs of phosphoryl transfer enzymes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3952-3958 (2008).
38. Warshel, A. et al. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106, 3210-3235 (2006).
39. Armstrong, R.N., Kondo, H. & Kaiser, E.T. Cyclic AMP-dependent ATPase activity of bovine heart protein kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 722-725 (1979).
40. Prowse, C.N. & Lew, J. Mechanism of activation of ERK2 by dual phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 99-103 (2001).
41. Wang, Y., Gan, L., Wang, E. & Wang, J. Exploring the dynamic functional landscape of adenylate kinase modulated by substrates. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 84-95 (2013).
42. Gur, M., Madura, J.D. & Bahar, I. Global transitions of proteins explored by a multiscale hybrid methodology: application to adenylate kinase. Biophys. J. 105, 1643-1652 (2013).
43. Henzler-Wildman, K.A. et al. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature 450, 838-844 (2007).
44. Wolf-Watz, M. et al. Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic- mesophilic enzyme pair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 945-949 (2004).
45. Palmer, A.G. NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem. Rev. 104, 3623-3640 (2004).
46. Yan, H.G. & Tsai, M.D. Nucleoside monophosphate kinases: structure, mechanism, and substrate specificity. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 73, 103-134 (1999).
47. Page, M.I. & Jencks, W.P. Entropic contributions to rate accelerations in enzymic and intramolecular reactions and the chelate effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68, 1678-1683 (1971).
48. Privett, H.K. et al. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3790-3795 (2012).
49. Röthlisberger, D. et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453, 190-195 (2008).
50. Kiss, G., Celebi-Olcum, N., Moretti, R., Baker, D. & Houk, K.N. Computational enzyme design. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 52, 5700-5725 (2013).
51. Blomberg, R. et al. Precision is essential for efficient catalysis in an evolved Kemp eliminase. Nature 503, 418-421 (2013).
52. Schwartz, S.D. & Schramm, V.L. Enzymatic transition states and dynamic motion in barrier crossing. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 551-558 (2009).
53. Benkovic, S.J. & Hammes-Schiffer, S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 301, 1196-1202 (2003).
54. Klinman, J.P. An integrated model for enzyme catalysis emerges from studies of hydrogen tunneling. Chem. Phys. Lett. 471, 179-193 (2009).
55. Boehr, D.D., Dyson, H.J. & Wright, P.E. An NMR perspective on enzyme dynamics. Chem. Rev. 106, 3055-3079 (2006).
56. Rozovsky, S. & McDermott, A.E. The time scale of the catalytic loop motion in triosephosphate isomerase. J. Mol. Biol. 310, 259-270 (2001).
57. Fierke, C.A., Johnson, K.A. & Benkovic, S.J. Construction and evaluation of the kinetic scheme associated with dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 26, 4085-4092 (1987).
58. Battye, T.G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H.R. & Leslie, A.G. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 271-281 (2011).
59. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 72-82 (2006).
60. McCoy, A.J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 (2007).
61. Murshudov, G.N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355-367 (2011).
62. Winn, M.D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235-242 (2011).
63. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
64. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486-501 (2010).
65. Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213-221 (2010).
66. Afonine, P.V. et al. phenix.model-vs-data: a high-level tool for the calculation of crystallographic model and data statistics. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 669-676 (2010).
67. Theobald, D.L. & Steindel, P.A. Optimal simultaneous superpositioning of multiple structures with missing data. Bioinformatics 28, 1972-1979 (2012).
68. MacKerell, A.D. et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586-3616 (1998).
69. MacKerell, A.D., Banavali, N. & Foloppe, N. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers 56, 257-265 (2000).
70. Brooks, B.R. et al. Charmm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4, 187-217 (1983).
71. Pavelites, J.J., Gao, J.L., Bash, P.A. & Mackerell, A.D. A molecular mechanics force field for NAD+, NADH, and the pyrophosphate groups of nucleotides. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 221-239 (1997).
72. Price, D.J. & Brooks, C.L. A modified TIP3P water potential for simulation with Ewald summation. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 10096-10103 (2004).
73. Gresh, N. et al. Analysis of the interactions taking place in the recognition site of a bimetallic Mg(II)-Zn(II) enzyme, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase. a parallel quantum-chemical and polarizable molecular mechanics study. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 4884-4895 (2010).
74. Pontikis, G., Borden, J., Martinek, V. & Florian, J. Linear energy relationships for the octahedral preference of Mg, Ca and transition metal ions. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 3588-3593 (2009).
75. Yang, S.Y. et al. Whether proton transition to the triphosphate tail of ATP occurs at protein kinase environment: a Car-Parrinello ab initio molecular dynamics study. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 108, 1239-1245 (2008).
76. Peters, M.B. et al. Structural survey of zinc containing proteins and the development of the zinc amber force field (ZAFF). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6, 2935-2947 (2010).
77. Ditzler, M.A., Otyepka, M., Sponer, J. & Walter, N.G. Molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics of RNA: conformational and chemical change we can believe in. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 40-47 (2010).
78. Banás, P., Jurecka, P., Walter, N.G., Sponer, J. & Otyepka, M. Theoretical studies of RNA catalysis: hybrid QM/MM methods and their comparison with MD and QM. Methods 49, 202-216 (2009).
79. Venkatramani, R. & Radhakrishnan, R. Computational study of the force dependence of phosphoryl transfer during DNA synthesis by a high fidelity polymerase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 088102 (2008).
80. Banás, P., Walter, N.G., Sponer, J. & Otyepka, M. Protonation states of the key active site residues and structural dynamics of the glmS Riboswitch as revealed by molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 8701-8712 (2010).
81. 2+ during rate-limiting ADP release from protein kinase A. Biochemistry 48, 11532-11545 (2009).
82. Phillips, J.C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781-1802 (2005).
83. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N•log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089-10092 (1993).
84. Ryckaert, J.P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H.J.C. Numerical-integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular-dynamics of N-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327-341 (1977).
85. Brünger, A.T. X-PLOR, Version 3.1: a system for X-ray crystallography and NMR (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1992).
86. Feller, S.E., Zhang, Y.H., Pastor, R.W. & Brooks, B.R. Constant-pressure molecular- dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613-4621 (1995).
87. Martyna, G.J., Tobias, D.J. & Klein, M.L. Constant-pressure molecular-dynamics algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4177-4189 (1994).
88. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435-447 (2008).
89. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H.J.C. & Fraaije, J.G.E.M. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463-1472 (1997).
90. Miyamoto, S. & Kollman, P.A. Settle: an analytical version of the shake and rattle algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 952-962 (1992).
91. Nose, S. A molecular-dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 52, 255-268 (1984).
92. Hoover, W.G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695-1697 (1985).
93. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single-crystals: a new molecular-dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182-7190 (1981).
94. Nose, S. & Klein, M.L. Constant pressure molecular-dynamics for molecular- systems. Mol. Phys. 50, 1055-1076 (1983).
95. Liang, J., Edelsbrunner, H. & Woodward, C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Protein Sci. 7, 1884-1897 (1998).
96. Le Guilloux, V., Schmidtke, P. & Tuffery, P. Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 138 (2009).
97. Patel, A.J., Varilly, P., Chandler, D. & Garde, S. Quantifying density fluctuations in volumes of all shapes and sizes using indirect umbrella sampling. J. Stat. Phys. 145, 265-275 (2011).
98. Baker, N.A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M.J. & McCammon, J.A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
99. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).
100. Loria, J.P., Rance, M. & Palmer, A.G.A. TROSY CPMG sequence for characterizing chemical exchange in large proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 15, 151-155 (1999).
101. Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293 (1995).
102. Johnson, B.A. & Blevins, R.A. NMR View: a computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 603-614 (1994).
103. Vranken, W.F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteinss 59, 687-696 (2005).
104. Davis, D.G., Perlman, M.E. & London, R.E. Direct measurements of the dissociation-rate constant for inhibitor-enzyme complexes via the T1 rho and T2 (CPMG) methods. J. Magn. Reson. B. 104, 266-275 (1994).
105. Carver, J. & Richards, R. A general two-site solution for the chemical exchange produced dependence of T2 upon the Carr-Purcell pulse separation. J. Magn. Res. 6, 89-105 (1972).
106. Jen, J. Chemical exchange and NMR T2 relaxation: the multisite case. J. Magn. Res. 30, 111-128 (1978).
107. Millet, O., Loria, J.P., Kroenke, C.D., Pons, M. & Palmer, A.G. III. The static magnetic field dependence of chemical exchange linebroadening defines the NMR chemical shift time scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 2867-2877 (2000).