Learning from multimedia artifacts: The role of metacognition

Reflective Thinking in Educational Settings: A Cultural Framework

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 55-101

  Antonietti, Alessandro ^a   Colombo, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923509622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139198745.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (148)

1. Anderson, R. C., & Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people about what they are reading. In G. Brown (Ed.) he psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9) (pp. 85-132). New York: Academic Press.
2. Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49,280-319.
3. Annett, J. (1989). Training of skilled performance. In A. M. Colley & J. R. Beech (Eds.) Acquisition and performance of cognitive skills (pp. 61-84). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Antonietti, A., & Cantoia, M. (2009). Media and learning: What can cognitive psychology suggest to multimedia education? Research on Education and Media, 1(1), 47-62.
5. Antonietti, A., & Colombo, B. (2008). Computer-supported learning tools: A bi-circular bi-directional framework. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 120 - 142.
6. Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., Iannello, P., & Inal, Y. (2011). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about distance education in virtual communities and multimedia environments: A cross-cultural study. In C. F. MacTeer (Ed.), Distance education (pp. 199-211). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
7. Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Lozotsev Y. (2008). Undergraduates’ metacognitive knowledge about the psychological effects of different kinds of computer-supported instructional tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2172 - 2198.
8. Antonietti, A., & Giorgetti, M. (2004). Students’ conceptions about learning from multimedia. In H. Niegemann, R. Brunken & D. Leutner (Eds.) Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 249-265). Munster- New York: Waxmann.
9. Antonietti, A., & Giorgetti, M. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about psychological aspects of learning through multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 267-282.
10. Antonietti, A., Imperio, E., Rasi, C., & Sacco, M. (2001). Virtual reality and hypermedia in learning to use a turning lathe. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17,142-155.
11. Antonietti, A., Rasi, C., Imperio, E., & Sacco, M. (2000). The representation of virtual reality in education. Education and Information Technologies, 5,317-327.
12. Astleitner, H. (1997). Lernen in Informationsnetzen: heoretische Aspekte und empirische Analysen des Umgangs mit neuen Informationstechnolgien aus erziehungswissenschafilicher Perspektive. Frankfurt: Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschften.
13. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1986). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Reprinted, New York: Werbel & Peck.
14. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.) Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp. 21 - 44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15. Baker, L., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3), 269-282.
16. Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27,303-328.
17. Bannert, M. (2001). Eine explorative Studie zur spontanen Lernwegplanung und gestaltung in vernetzten Lernumgebungen. Vortrag auf der 60. Tagung der Arbeitsgruppe für Empirische Pädagogische Forschung (AEPF), 19-21 March 2001, Bamberg.
18. Bannert, M. (2002) Managing cognitive load - recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12, 139-146.
19. Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829-835.
20. Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemologi cal beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28,15-30.
21. Bennett, R. E., Goodman, M., Hessinger, J., Kahn, H., Ligget, J., Marshall, G., & Zack, J. (1999). Using multimedia in large-scale computer-based testing programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 15,229-283.
22. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where are we today? International Journal of Educational Research, 31,445-457.
24. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and selfesteem. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.) Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). What is reflection in learning? In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.) Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 85-90). New York: Nichols.
27. Brenstein, E., & Schellhas, B. (1998). Lernstrategien in hypermedialen Lernumgebungen. Vortag auf dem 39. Kolloquium zur Lern-und Lehrforschung. Universität Potsdam.
28. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Brown, C. A., Hedberg, J. G., & Harper, B. M. (1994). Metacognition as abasis for learning support software. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7,3-26.
30. Brown, K. G., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Using computer technology in training: Building an infrastructure for active learning. In K. Kraiger (Ed.) Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 192-233). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Burke, P. (2000). A social history of knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Oxford-Cambridge: Polity Press-Blackwell.
32. Butler, D. B. (1998). A strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning by students with learning disabilities. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 160-183). New York: Guilford Press.
33. Calcaterra, A., Antonietti, A., & Underwood, J. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers and Education, 44,441-457.
34. Colombo, B., & Antonietti, A. (2006). Are the cognitive principles underlying multimedia learning counterintuitive? A study of undergraduates’ folk conceptions. In G. Clarebout & J. Elen (Eds.) Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity. Advances in studying and designing powerful (computer-based) learning environments (pp. 67-76). Rotterdam: Sense.
35. Colombo, B., & Antonietti A. (2010). Self-regulated strategies and cognitive styles in multimedia learning. In G. Dettori & D. Persico (Eds.) Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 54-70). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
36. Colombo, B., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Naïve conceptions about multimedia learning: A study on primary school textbooks. Frontiers in Psychology. 4 (450), doi a0.3389ffpsyg.2013.00450.
37. Colombo, B., Lissoni, M., & Antonietti, A. (2009). Do illustrated instructional books promote multimedia learning? In O. Demir and C. Celik (Eds.) Multimedia in educational and special education (pp. 39-57). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
38. Cuevas H. M., Fiore S. M., Bowers C. A., & Salas E. (2004). Fostering constructive cognitive and metacognitive activity in computer-based complex task training environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 225-241.
39. Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., & Oser, R. L. (2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science, 30, 433-464.
40. Davidson, J. E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem solving. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.) Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (207-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen.
42. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). he expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated and reflective. Instructional Science, 24,1-24.
43. Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26, 65-79.
44. Felker, D. B., & Dapra, R. A. (1975). Effects of question type and question placement on problem solving ability from prose material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67,380-384.
45. Fiore, S. M., Cuevas, H. M., Scielzo, S., & Salas, E. (2002). Training individuals for distributed teams: Problem solving assessment for distributed mission research. Computers in Human Behavior, 18,729-744.
46. Fiorina, L., Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Bartolomeo, A. (2007). hinking style, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation. Computer and Education, 49, 916 - 941.
47. Fisher, E. (1996). Identifying effective educational talk. Language and Education, 10, 237 - 253.
48. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.) he nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34,906-911.
50. Fleishman, E. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1989). Individual attributes and training performance. In I. L. Goldstein (Ed.) Training and development in organizations (pp. 183-255). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
51. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon & R. J. Spiro (Eds.) Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Forman, E., & Cazden, C. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: he cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.) Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323347). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
53. Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6,41-57.
54. Giorgetti, M., & Antonietti, A. (2005). Come gli studenti si rappresentano il ruolo della multimedialità nella formazione tools in education (How students conceive the role of multimedia). Rassegna di Psicologia, 22(1),141-159.
55. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Calibration of comprehension. J ournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
56. Gordon, J. (1996). Tracks for learning: Metacognition and learning technologies. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 12,46-55. [Online]. Available: http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/gen/aset/ajet/ajet12/wi96p46. html
57. Gourgey, A. E. (1998). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. Instructional Science, 26, 81 - 96.
58. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125-148.
59. Greene, R. L. (1988). Generation effects in frequency judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 298-304.
60. Groppo, M., & Locatelli, M. C. (1996). Mente e cultura: Tecnologie della comunicazione e processi educativi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
61. Halpain, D. R., Glover, J. A., & Harvey, A. L. (1985). Differential effects of higher and lower order questions: Attention hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,703-715.
62. Hamilton, R. J. (1985). A framework for the evaluation of the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives. Review of Educational Research, 55,47 - 85.
63. Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon & J. Richardson (Eds.) Hypertext: A psychological perspective (pp. 51-69). New York: Ellis Horwood.
64. Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational, Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10,285-305.
65. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30,22-26.
66. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003) The use of comprehension aids in a hypermedia environment: Investigating the impact of metacognitive awareness and epistemo-logical beliefs. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 275-289.
67. Hartman, H. J. (2001a). Developing students’ metacognitive knowledge and skills. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.) Metacognition in learning and instruction: heory, research, and practice (pp. 33-68). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
68. Hartman, H. J. (2001b). Metacognition in science teaching and learning. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.) Metacognition in learning and instruction: heory, research, and practice (pp. 173-201). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
69. Hasseelhorn, M. (1992). Metakognition und Lernen. In G. Nold (Ed.) Lernbedingungen und Lernstrategien. Welche Rolle spielen kognitive Verstehensstrukturen? (pp. 35-63). Tübingen: Hogrefe.
70. Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technologies Research and Development, 45,37-64.
71. Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Selfregulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57-85). New York: Guilford.
72. Höffler, T. N., &Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17,722-738.
73. Houston, R. A. (1988). Literacy in early modern Europe: Culture and education 1500-1800. London-New York: Longman.
74. Howard-Jones, P. A., & Martin, R. J. (2002). The effect of questioning on concept learning within a hypertext system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18,10-20.
75. Hsiao, Y. (1997). The effects of cognitive styles and learning strategies in a hypermedia environment: A review of literature. [Online]. Available: http:// www.edb.utexas.edu /mmresearch/Students97/Hsiao
76. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22,255-278.
77. Jamet, E., Gavota, M., & Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 135 - 145.
78. Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
79. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Kleinman, D. L., & Serfaty, D. (1989). Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking. In R. Gibson, J. P. Kincaid & B. Goldiez (Eds.) Proceedings of the Interactive Networked Simulation for Training Conference (pp. 22 - 27). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
81. Kramarski, B. (2000). he effects of different instructional methods on the ability to communicate mathematical reasoning. In T. Nakahara, & M. Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings of the 24th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 167 - 171). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.
82. Kramarski, B., & Ritkof R. (2002). The effects of metacognition and email interactions on learning graphing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18,33-43.
83. Kumpulainen, K., Salovaara, H., & Mutanen, M. (2001). he nature of students’ sociocognitive activity in handling and processing multimedia- based science material in a small group learning task. Jnstructional Science, 29, 481 - 515.
84. Lawless, K. A., &Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedialearning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25,117-131.
85. Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through refi ection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4,187-210.
86. Levin, J. R., & Mayer, R. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward & M. Binkley (Eds.) Learning from textbooks: heory and practice (pp. 95-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
87. Liverta Sempio, O. (1995). Contesto e processi cognitivi. Dalla cognizione intraindividuale alla cognizione situata. In O. Liverta Sempio & A. Marchetti (Eds.) Ilpensiero dell’altro: Contesto, conoscenza e teorie della mente (pp. 3-40). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
88. Liverta Sempio, O. (1999). Iprocessi di insegnamento-apprendimento come interdipendenza di menti. Lecture held at the Convegno di Psicologia Culturale, Firenze, 4-5 May 1999.
89. Maki, R. H. (1998). Metacomprehension of text: Inf uence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy. In D. Medin (Ed.) hepsychology of learning and motivation (pp. 223-248). New York: Academic Press.
90. Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1,126-129.
91. Mandl, H., & Levin, J. R. (1989). Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
92. Maqsud, M. (1998). Effects of metacognitive instruction on mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics of low mathematics achievers. Educational Research, 40, 237-243.
93. Mason, L., & Boldrin, A. (2008). Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the web. In M. S. Khine (Ed.) Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. (pp. 377-404). New York: Springer.
94. Mayer, R. E. (1993). Illustrations that instruct. In R. Glaser (Ed.) Advances in instructional psychology (vol. 4, pp. 253-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
95. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: Te SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357 - 371.
96. Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26,46-63.
97. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Instructional technology. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, R. W. Schvaneveldt, S. T. Dumais, D. S. Lindsay & M. T. H. Chi (Eds.) Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 551-569). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
98. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Mayer, R. E. (2005). he Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. McInerney, V., McInerney, D. M., & Walsh, H. W. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude-treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 686-695.
101. Mengelkamp, C., & Bannert, M. (2009). Judgements about knowledge: Searching for factors that influence their validity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 163-190.
102. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997) IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365 - 394.
103. Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with epearl. Computers & Education, 55,1, 84-91. doi:10.1016/j. compedu.2009.12.005
104. Moore, D., Zabrucky, K., & Commander, N. E. (1997). Metacomprehension and performance in younger and older adults. Educational Gerontology, 23, 467 - 475.
105. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: Te impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(4), 1686-1706.
106. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: Te role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270-298.
107. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in Web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(3), 1126-1144.
108. Noddings, N. (1990) Constructivism in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph 4, 7-210.
109. Ong, W. J. (1988). Orality and literacy: he technologizing of the word. New York: Methuen.
110. Osman, M. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 83-99.
111. Pea, R. D. (1985) Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20,1967-1182.
112. Perkins, D. N. (1985) Te fingertip effect: How information processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14,11-17.
113. Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers and policy-makers. New York: Harper Collins College.
114. Proctor, R. W., & Dutta, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
115. Puntambekar, S., &duBoulay, B. (1997). Design and development of MIST: A system to help students develop metacognition. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 1 - 35.
116. Rickards, J. P. (1979). Adjunct questions in text: A critical review of methods and processes. Review of Educational Research, 49,181-196.
117. Rouet, J. F., Levenen, J. J., Dillon, A., &Spiro, R. J. (Eds.) (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
118. Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, C. S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002). Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: Some food for thought. International Journal of Management Review, 4, 135 - 153.
119. Salomon, G. (1979). Media and symbol systems as related to cognition and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 131 - 148.
120. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for knowledge-building discourse. Communications of the ACM, 36,37-41.
121. Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review. Special Issue: Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends, 19(3), 285-307.
122. Schnotz, W. (1994). Aujbau von Wissensstrukturen. Weinheim: Beltz.
123. Schnotz, W. (1998). Strategy-specific information access in knowledge acquisition from hypertext. In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.) Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition. Berlin: Springer.
124. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113 - 125.
125. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19,143-154.
126. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning - self efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631-649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
127. Scott, B. M., & Schwartz, N. H. (2007). Navigational spatial displays: he role of metacognition as cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 89 - 105.
128. Seale, J. K., & Cann, A. J. (2000). Reflection on-line and off-line: he role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect. Computers and Education, 34, 309 - 320.
129. Simons, P. R. J., & De Jong, F. P. (1992). Self-regulation and computer-assisted instruction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41, 333-346.
130. Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.) Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 89-118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
131. Snow, R. E. (1997). Individual differences. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds.) Instructional design: International perspectives. (Vol. 1): heory, research, and models (pp. 215-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
132. Sobrol, D. T. (2000). An appraisal of medical students’ reflection-in-learning. Medical Education, 34,182-187.
133. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31,24-33.
134. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computertool metaware on the Web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(3), 716-737.
135. Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2009). Not everybody needs help to seek help: Surprising effects of metacognitive instructions to foster help-seeking in an online-learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1020-1028.
136. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26,127-140.
137. Tennyson, R. D., & Parks, O. (1980) Teaching concepts: A review of instructional design research literature. Review of Educational Research, 50, 55-70.
138. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a Web-based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behaviour, 20, 551-567.
139. Volet, S. E. (1991). Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students’ learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 319-336.
140. Von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection. Learning and Instruction, 2, 59-68.
141. Vosniadou, S. (1996). Towards arevised cognitive psychology for newadvances in learning and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 6, 95-109.
142. Walczyk, J., Hall, V. (1989). Effects of examples and embedded questions on the accuracy of comprehension self-assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 435-437.
143. Wang T. H., Wang W. L., Wang K. H., & Huang H. C. (2004). A case study of Web-based Instruction (WBI): Te effectiveness of using Frontpage Feedback System (FFS) as metacognition strategy for freshmen biology teaching. International Journal on E-Learning. April-June, 18-27.
144. Watts, G., & Anderson, R. C. (1971). Effects of three types of inserted questions in learning from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62,387-394.
145. Wilson, B., G., (Ed.) (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
146. Winne, P. H., & Stockley, D. B. (1998). Computing technologies as sites for developing learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Selfregulated learning: Self-reflective practice (pp. 106-136). New York: Guilford.
147. Young, A. C. (1997). Higher-order learning and thinking: What is it and how is it taught? Educational Technology, 37,38-41.
148. Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31,845-862.