Epistemic metacognition in the context of information searching on the web

Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs: Epistemological Studies across Diverse Cultures

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 377-404

  Mason, Lucia ^a   Boldrin, Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891971644     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6596-5_18     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Alexander, J. E., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality on the Web. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Alexander, P. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2007). First steps: Scholars' promising movements into a nascent field of inquiry. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction. Oxford: Elsevier.
3. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women' ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.
5. Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing fo learning on the Web in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 797-817.
6. Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 321-346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027-1042.
8. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2005). The relationship between internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 141-171.
9. Brem, S. K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191-213.
10. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Brunner, C. B., & Tally, W. (1999). The new media literacy handbook: An educator's guide to bringing new media into the classroom. New York: Anchor Books.
12. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415-449.
13. Chandler, M., Boyes, M., & Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 370-395.
14. Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315.
15. Clark, D. B., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the Internet: The knowledge integration evaluation. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 859-871.
16. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding ofreading comprehension to encompass new literacies. Reading Online (www.readingonline.org/electronic/rt/2-03).
17. diSessa, A. A., Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2003). J's epistemological stance and strategies. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 237-290). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buchingham: Open University.
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal report as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
20. Feldman, A., Konond, C., & Coulter, B. (2000). Network science a decade later: The Internet and classroom learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
22. Greenfield, P., & Yan, Z. (2006). Children, adolescents, and the Internet: A new field of inquirt in developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 42, 391-394.
23. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30, 22-26.
24. Hess, B. (1999). Graduate student cognition during information retrieval using the World Wide Web: A pilot study. Computers & Education, 33, 1-13.
25. Hirsch, S. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265-1283.
26. Hofer, B. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
27. Hofer, B. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39, 43-55.
28. Hofer, B. (2006). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing: Integrating domain specificity and domain generality: A response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 67-76.
29. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405.
30. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
31. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.) (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. International Reading Association (2001). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum: A position statement. Online document: http://www.reading.org/downloads/positions/ps1048-technology.pdf.
33. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301-333.
34. Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.
35. King, P. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Human Development, 26, 222-232.
37. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
38. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16-26.
40. Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.), Children's reasoning and the mind (pp. 301-326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
41. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
43. Leach, J., & Lewis, J. (2002). The role of students' epistemological knowledge in the process of conceptual change in science. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change (pp. 201-216). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
44. Leach, J., Millar, R., Ryder, J., & M.-G. Séré (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: The consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10, 497-527.
45. Leu, D. J. Jr. (2002). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Linn, M., Bell, P., & Hsi, S. (1998). Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The Knowledge Integration Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 6, 4-38.
47. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 57-68.
48. Mason, L. (2002). Developing epistemological thinking to foster conceptual changes in different domains. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 301-335). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
49. Mason, L. (2003). Personal epistemologies and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 199-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103-128.
51. Mason, L., & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the Conceptual Change Approach in Learning and Instruction (pp. 165-197). Oxford: Elsevier.
52. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 9, 47-58.
54. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3-54.
55. Nuckles, & Bromme, R. (2002). Internet experts' planning of explanations for laypersons: A web experimental approach in the Internet domain. Experimental Psychology, 49, 292-304.
56. Perry, W. G. Jr. (1969). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt (Rinehart and Winston).
57. Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Meausurements.
58. Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students' learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 282-292.
59. Rothenberg, D. (1997). How the web destroys the quality of students' research papers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, A44.
60. Ryan, M. P. (1984). Monitoring text comprehension: Individual differences in epistemological standards. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 248-258.
61. Schacter, J., Chung, G., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840-849.
62. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
63. Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435-443.
64. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 523-538.
65. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
66. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies in individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Tsai, C. C. (2004). Beyond cognitive and metacognitive tools: The use of the Internet as an epistemological tool for instruction. British Journal of Educational Technological, 35, 525-536.
69. Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 145-160.
70. Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2005). Strategies of Internet reading with different reading purposes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.