Learner control in hypermedia environments

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 285-307

  Scheiter, Katharina ^a   Gerjets, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hypermedia learning; Instructional approaches; Learner characteristics; Learner control; Navigation strategies; Usability problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548571748     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 199-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201-252.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In M. M. D. Reinking, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post typographic world (pp. 15-43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (1995). Learning strategies for unstructured hypermedia-A framework for theory, research, and practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 387-400.
6. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199-209.
7. Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27, 303-328.
8. Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 13-25.
9. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45, 23-41.
10. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., Young, M. F., & Owen, S. V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches. Instructional Science, 24, 377-395.
11. Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1995). Cognitive mapping architectures and hypermedia disorientation: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 239-255.
12. Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1996). The effects of content-structure focusing on learner structural knowledge acquisition, retention, and disorientation in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 271-281.
13. Beaufils, A. (2000). Tools and strategies for searching hypermedia environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 114-124.
14. Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 15-30.
15. Bernstein, M. (1991). The navigation problem reconsidered. In E. Berk & J. Devlin (Eds.), Hypertext/Hypermedia handbook (pp. 285-297). New York: Intertext Publications.
16. Boechler, P. M., & Dawson, R. W. (2002). Effects of navigation tool information on hypertext navigation behavior: A configural analysis of page-transition data. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 95-115.
17. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and application. San Diego: Academic.
18. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space, the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87-110.
20. Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135-145.
21. Canter, D., Rivers, R., & Storrs, G. (1985). Characterizing user navigation through complex data structures. Behavior and Information Technology, 4, 93-102.
22. Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. (1992). Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 865-884.
23. Chen, C. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 529-542.
24. Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251-266.
25. Chen, S. Y., & Ford, N. J. (1998). Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: An individual differences approach. Knowledge Organization, 25, 67-78.
26. Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125-156.
27. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
28. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807-840). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
29. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41.
30. Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rasmussen, K. L., & Bratton-Jeffery, M. F. (1997). Investigating learning strategies generation in a hypermedia environment using qualitative methods. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 247-261.
31. De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on exploratory behaviour and knowledge acquisition in hypertext environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 219-232.
32. Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 73-107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 431-468.
34. De Vries, E., & de Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science, 3-4, 285-302.
35. Dias, P., Gomes, M. J., & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 93-117.
36. Dillon, A. (1991). Readers' models of text structures: The case of academic articles. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 35, 913-925.
37. Dillon, A. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
39. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005) Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-588). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Dufresne, R., & Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 287-293). Amsterdam: IOS.
41. Edwards, D. M., & Hardman, L. (1989). 'Lost in hyperspace': Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext document. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into practice (pp. 90-105). Oxford: Intellect.
42. Foss, C. L. (1989). Detecting lost users: Empirical Studies on browsing hypertext (No. Report No. 972, Programme 8). Sophia-Antipolis: INRIA.
43. Gabbard, R. B. (2000). Constructivism, hypermedia, and the world wide web. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 103-110.
44. Gall, J. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1994). A framework for the study of hypertext. Instructional Science, 22, 207-232.
45. Gerjets, P., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students' conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 445-465.
46. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 33-41.
47. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Heise, E. (2006a). Distraction in hypertext-based learning and problem solving: Effects of goal competition and task difficulty on strategies of information utilization and performance, (in press).
48. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Schorr, T. (2003). Modeling processes of volitional action control in multiple-task performance: How to explain effects of goal competition and task difficulty on processing strategies and performance within ACT-R. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3, 355-400.
49. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (2006b). Supporting information comparisons in example-based hypertext environments. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1364-1369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285-305.
51. Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext. A psychological perspective (pp. 51-69). New York: Ellis Horwood.
52. Herder, E., & Juvina, I. (2004). Discovery of individual user navigation styles. In G. D. Magoulas & S. Y. Chen (Eds.), Adaptive Hypermedia AH2004 Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia. Eindhoven.
53. Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the world-wide web. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 45, 37-64.
54. Hirashima, T., Hachiya, K., Kashihara, A., & Toyoda, J. (1997). Information filtering using user's context on browsing in hypertext. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 7, 239-256.
55. Hoffman, S. (1997). Elaboration Theory and hypermedia: Is there a link? Educational Technology, 37, 57-64.
56. Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129-140.
57. Horney, M. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The ElectroText Project: Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 71-91.
58. Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145-199.
59. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 321-364.
60. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301-333.
61. Jonassen, D. H., Ambruso, D. R., & Olesen, J. (1992). Designing a hypertext on transfusion medicine using cognitive flexibility theory. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 309-322.
62. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3-25). Berlin: Springer.
63. Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1-8.
64. Kelly, A. E. (1993). Designing instructional hypertext for use in lecture note review: Knowledge engineering and preliminary testing. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 149-176.
65. Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behavior and Information Technology, 14, 239-250.
66. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension-A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 125-140.
68. Landow, G. P. (1990). Popular fallacies about hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 39-59). Weinheim: Springer.
69. Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext. The convergence of contemporary literary theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
70. Last, D. A., O'Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 3-25.
71. Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117-131.
72. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385-399.
73. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51-69.
74. Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W. (2002). Children's hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34, 274-284.
75. Lee, S.-S., & Lee, Y. H. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 491-498.
76. Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cuing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 2, 25-37.
77. Lin, C.-H., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1996) Effects of Linking structure and cognitive style on students' performance and attitude in a computer based hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 317-329.
78. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of promoting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837-858.
79. Lunts, E. (2002). What does the literature say about the effectiveness of learner control in computer-assisted instruction? Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(2).
80. MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 189-206.
81. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
82. Mayes, T., Kibby, M., & Anderson, T. (1990). Learning about learning from hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 227-250). Berlin: Springer.
83. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998a). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40, 18-27.
84. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998b). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129-142.
85. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 8, 43-64.
86. McGrath, D. (1992). Hypertext, CAI, paper, or program control: Do learners benefit from choices? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 513-532.
87. McGuire, E. G. (1996). Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments. Telematics and Informatics, 13, 251-260.
88. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
89. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
90. Melara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 313-328.
91. Merrill, D. M. (1980). Learning control in computer based learning. Computers & Education, 4, 77-95.
92. Mills, R. J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 21-30.
93. Mills, R. J., Paper, D., Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2002). Hypertext navigation-An intrinsic component of the corporate intranet. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 49-50.
94. Misanchuk, E. R., & Schwier, R. A. (1992). Representing interactive multimedia and hypermedia audit trails. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 355-372.
95. Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. L., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 237-255.
96. Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157-174.
97. Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypermedia document on users' navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer studies, 57, 1-26.
98. Paolucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 7, 123-150.
99. Patterson, N. G. (2000). Hypertext and the changing roles of readers. English Journal, 90, 74-80.
100. Pazzani, M. (1991). The influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 416-432.
101. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327-345.
102. Reed, W. M., & Oughton, J. M. (1997). Computer experience and interval-based hypermedia navigation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 38-52.
103. Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Evaluating interactive learning systems. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Education.
104. Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The Elaboration Theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335-381). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. Rouet, J.-F. (1990). Interactive text processing by inexperienced (hyper-) readers. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, & J. André (Eds.), Hypertext: Concepts, systems, and applications. Proceedings of the first European conference on hypertext (pp. 250-260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specifity and prior knowledge on students' search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409-428.
107. Rouet, J.-F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.
110. Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-9.
111. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Heise, E. (2000). Hypertext navigation and conflicting goal intentions: Using log files to study distraction and volitional protection in learning and problem solving. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 441-446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
112. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2006). A methodological alternative to media comparison studies: Linking information utilization strategies and instructional approach in hypermedia learning. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2117-2122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
113. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
114. Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners' memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77-93.
115. Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143-163.
116. Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 605-622). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42, 33-46.
118. Shute, V. J. (1993). A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 4, 61-93.
119. Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19, 85-96.
120. Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1995). Learner-Control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisc instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 217-231.
121. Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist, 15, 151-158.
122. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
124. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
125. Tergan, S.-O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 209-235.
126. Wenger, M. J., & Payne, D. G. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 93-130.
127. Whalley, P. (1990). Models of hypertext structure and learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 61-67). Berlin: Springer.
128. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Danlosky & A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego, CA: Academic.
130. Yeh, S.-W., & Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 141-159.
131. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44, 17-27.
132. Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 331-358.
133. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.