Computer-supported learning tools: A bi-circular bi-directional framework

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 120-142

  Antonietti, Alessandro ^a   Colombo, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Computer; CSLT; Feelings; Framework; Learning; Representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349164989     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Andone D., Dron J., Pemberton L., and Boyne C. E-learning environments for digitally-minded students. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 18 (2007) 41-53
2. Antonietti A., and Giorgetti M. Students' conceptions about learning from multimedia. In: Niegemann H., Brünken R., and Leutner D. (Eds). Instructional design for multimedia learning (2004), Waxmann, Münster-New York 249-265
3. Antonietti A., and Giorgetti M. Teachers' beliefs about psychological aspects of learning through multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior 22 (2006) 267-282
4. Antonietti A., Rasi C., Imperio E., and Sacco M. The representation of virtual reality in education. Education and Information Technologies 5 (2000) 317-327
5. Ballard S., Stapleton J., and Carroll E. Students' perceptions of course Web sites used in face-to-face instruction. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 15 (2004) 197-211
6. Bennett L., and Scholes R. Goals and attitudes related to technology use in a social studies method course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 1 (2001) 373-385
7. Bereiter C. Education and mind in the knowledge age (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
8. Beyth-Marom, R., & Saporta, K. (2002). Individual differences in attitudes towards and choices of learning/teaching technology. In: Proceedings of the second research workshop of European Distance Education Network (EDEN) "research and policy in open and distance learning" (pp. 168-172). Hildesheim, 21-23 March 2002.
9. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P.R., and Zeidner M. (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
10. Bolliger D.U., and Martindale T. Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning 3 (2004) 61-67
11. Breton P. Le culte de l'Internet (2001), La Découverte, Paris
12. In: Bryant J., and Zillman D. (Eds). Media effects. Advances in theory and research (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
13. Calcaterra A., Antonietti A., and Underwood J. Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers and Education 44 (2005) 441-457
14. Carrell L.J., and Menzel K.E. Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms. Communication Education 50 (2001) 230-240
15. Chuang S.C., and Tsai C.C. Preferences toward the constructivist Internet-based learning environments among high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 255-272
16. In: Cohen E. (Ed). Challenges of information technology education in the 21st century (2002), Idea Group, Hershey, PA
17. Colley A. Gender differences in adolescents' perceptions of the best and worst aspects of computing at school. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 673-682
18. Crosier J.K., Cobb S.V., and Wilson J.R. Experimental comparison of virtual reality with traditional teaching methods for teaching radioactivity. Educational and Information Technologies 5 (2000) 329-343
19. DeNeui D.L., and Dodge T.L. Asynchronous learning networks and student outcomes: The utility of online learning components in hybrid courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology 33 (2006) 256-259
20. Dinet J., Marquet P., and Nissen E. An exploratory study of adolescent's perceptions of the Web. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (2003) 538-545
21. Dori Y.J., and Belcher K. How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts?. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14 (2005) 243-279
22. Eastin M.S. Teen Internet use: Relating social perceptions and cognitive models to behavior. CyberPsychology and Behavior 8 (2005) 62-75
23. Eilon B., and Kliachko S. Perceptions of the teacher's role by prospective elementary school science teachers in a Web-based biology course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 12 (2004) 339-360
24. Enochsson A. Children's models of the Internet. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annals (2004) 5-23
25. Fiorina L., Antonietti A., Colombo B., and Bartolomeo A. Thinking style, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation. Computer and Education 49 (2007) 916-941
26. Foo C.T. Child of the Internet: Perceptions of creativity in e-identitites. CyberPsychology and Behavior 6 (2003) 195-199
27. Gao T. The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a Web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 14 (2003) 367-386
28. Gao T., and Lehman J.D. The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a Web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 14 (2003) 367-386
29. Giles D. Media psychology (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
30. In: Goodman P.S. (Ed). Technology enhanced learning. Opportunities for change (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
31. Gordon M., Killey M., Shevlin M., McIlroy D., and Tierney K. The factor structure of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale and the Computer Thoughts Survey. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 291-298
32. Grove J. VR and history. VR in the Schools 2 1 (1997) 3-9
33. Hackman M.Z., and Walker K.B. Perceptions of proximate and distant learners enrolled in university-level communication courses: A significant nonsignificant finding. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (1995) 43-51
34. Hall G., George A., and Rutherford W. Measuring the stages of concern about an innovation: A manual for use of the stages of concern questionnaire (1977), Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, The University of Texas, Austin, TX
35. Hassett J., Ingram A.L., Hassett M., and Marino E. What do learners like? Ratings of off-the-shelf Web-based training courses. International Journal on E-Learning 2 (2003) 50-60
36. Hémard D. Evaluating hypermedia structures as a means of improving language learning strategies and motivation. ReCALL-Journal of Eurocall 18 (2006) 24-44
37. Henderson L., Eshet Y., and Klemes J. Under the microscope: Factors influencing student outcomes in a computer integrated classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 19 (2000) 211-236
38. Hofer B., and Pintrich P.R. Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
39. Huang H.M., and Liaw S.S. Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 729-743
40. Hulshof C., Eysink T., and de Jong T. The ZAP project: Designing interactive computer tools for learning psychology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (2006) 337-351
41. Janssen J., Erkens G., and Kanselaar G. Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1105-1125
42. Jiang M., and Ting E. A study of factors influencing students' perceived learning in a Web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 6 (2000) 317-338
43. Johnson H. Dialogue and the construction of knowledge in e-learning: Exploring students' perceptions of their learning while using Blackboard's asynchronous discussion board. Eureopean Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning (2007). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Henry_Johnson.htm [Available: 〈http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Henry_Johnson.htm〉]
44. Joinson A.N. Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (2004) 472-478
45. Jorge C.M.H., Jorge M.C.A., Gutiérrez E.R., Garcìa E.G., and Dìaz M.B. Use of the ICT and the perception of e-learning among university students: A differential perspective according to gender and degree year group. Interactive Educational Multimedia 7 (2003) 13-28
46. Katz Y.K. Attitudes affecting college students' preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2 (2001) 9-18
47. Koohang A. A study of users' perceptions toward e-learning courseware usability. International Journal on E-Learning 3 (2004) 10-17
48. Kozma R.B. Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development 7 (1994) 19-42
49. Kumpulainen K., Salovaara H., and Mutanen M. The nature of students' sociocognitive activity in handling and processing multimedia-based science material in a small group learning task. Instructional Science 29 (2001) 481-515
50. Lawless K.A., and Brown S.W. Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science 25 (1997) 117-131
51. Liaw S.S. An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior 18 (2002) 17-35
52. Liu L., Maddux C., and Johnson L. Computer attitude and achievement: Is time an intermediate variable?. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 12 (2004) 593-607
53. Liu M. A study of engaging high-school students as multimedia designers in a cognitive apprenticeship-style learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior 14, (1995) 387-415
54. Liu M. Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior 20 (2004) 357-379
55. Liu M., Ayersman D.J., and Reed W.M. Perceptions of a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior 11 (1995) 411-428
56. Lonka K., Joram E., and Bryson M. Conceptions of learning and knowledge: Does training make a difference?. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21 (1996) 240-260
57. Madell D., and Muncer S. Back from the beach but hanging on the telephone? English adolescents' attitudes and experiences of mobile phones and the Internet. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (2004) 359-367
58. Maier P., and Warren A. Integrating technology in learning and teaching (2000), Kogan Page, London
59. Mantovani G. L' elefante invisibile (The invisibile elephant) (1998), Giunti, Firenze
60. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
61. Mayer R.E. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York
62. Messier W.P. Student perception: Phase one to building a center for media training and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 12 (2003) 21-31
63. Metcalfe J., and Shimamura A. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
64. Mimirinis M., and Bhattacharya M. Design of virtual learning environments for deep learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 18 (2007) 55-64
65. Mitra A., Hazen M.D., LaFrance B., and Rogan R.G. Faculty use and non-use of electronic mail: Attitudes, expectations and profiles. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4 (1999). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/mitra.html [Available: 〈http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/mitra.html〉]
66. In: Monteith M. (Ed). IT for learning enhancement (1998), Intellect Books, Exeter, UK
67. Moreno R., and Flowerday T. Students' choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology 31 (2006) 186-207
68. Mouza C., and Bell B.L. Assessing the impact of a Web-driven, goal-based scenario in the science classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 20 (2001) 265-292
69. Munneke L., Andriessen J., Kanselaar G., and Kirschner P. Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1072-1088
70. Narciss S., Proske A., and Koerndle H. Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1126-1144
71. Norman D.A. The design of everyday things (1988), Basic Books, New York
72. In: O'Neil H.F., and Perez R. (Eds). Technology applications in education (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
73. Ocker R.J., and Yaverbaum G.J. Collaborative learning environments: Exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer conferencing settings. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12 (2001) 427-448
74. Rekkedal T., and Qvist-Eriksen S. Support services in E-learning: An evaluation study of students' needs and satisfaction. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning 1 (2004). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Rekkedal_Qvist-Eriksen.htm [Available: 〈http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Rekkedal_Qvist-Eriksen.htm〉]
75. Richardson J. An evaluation of virtual learning environments and their learners: Do individual differences affect perception of virtual learning environments?. Interactive Educational Multimedia 3 (2001) 38-52
76. Saadé R.G., He X., and Kira D. Exploring dimensions to online learning. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1721-1739
77. Salomon G. On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: The case of the writing partner. In: Lajoie S.P., and Derry S.J. (Eds). Computers as cognitive tools (1993), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 179-196
78. Saye J.W., and Brush T. Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development 50 (2002) 77-96
79. Schank R.C., and Cleary C. Engines for education (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
80. Schraw G., and Moshman D. Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7 (1995) 351-371
81. In: Selwood I.D., Fung A.C.W., and O'Mahoney C.D. (Eds). Management of education in the information age. The role of ICT (2003), Kluwer, New York
82. Selwyn N. Students' attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education. Computers and Education 28 (1997) 35-41
83. Shaw G.P., and Marlow N. The role of student learning style, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers and Education 33 (1999) 223-234
84. Small M.H., and Lohrasbi A. MBA student perspectives on online degrees and courses: An empirical analysis. International Journal on E-Learning 2 (2003) 5-14
85. Stricker L.J., Wilder G.Z., and Rock D.A. Attitudes about the computer-based test of English as a foreign language. Computers in Human Behavior 20 (2004) 37-54
86. In: Taylor H., and Hogenbirk P. (Eds). Information and communication technologies in education. The school of the future (2001), Kluwer, New York
87. Tichon J., Loh J., and King R. Psychology student opinion of virtual reality as a tool to educate about schizofrenia. International Journal on E-Learning 3 4 (2004) 40-46
88. Tsai C.C. Adolescents' perceptions toward the Internet: A 4-T framework. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (2004) 458-463
89. Wang D., Lin S.S.J., and Sun C. DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 1997-2010
90. Weiner C. Key ingredients to online learning: Adolescent students study in cyberspace. International Journal on E-Learning 2 (2003) 44-50
91. Wilson T., and Whitelock D. What are the perceived benefits of participating in a computer-mediated communication (CMC) environment for distance learning computer science students?. Computers and Education 30 (1998) 259-269
92. Wissick C.A., Dubay T., Helman N., and Cates D.L. Can university faculty affect student attitudes toward electronic mail?. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (1995) 71-84
93. Workman M. Performance and perceived effectiveness in computer-based and computer-aided education: Do cognitive style make a difference?. Computers in Human Behavior 20 (2004) 517-534
94. Xiao L., and Carroll J.M. Fostering an informal learning community of computer technologies at school. Behaviour and Information Technology 26 (2007) 23-36
95. Yaghi H.M. Pre-university students' attitudes toward computers: An international perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research 16 (1997) 237-249
96. Yang B., and Lester D. Attitudes toward buying online. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (2004) 85-91
97. Yang S.C., and Liu S.F. The study of interactions and attitudes of third-grade students' learning information technology via cooperative approach. Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 45-72
98. Young K.S. An empirical examination of client attitudes towards online counselling. CyberPsychology and Behavior 8 (2005) 172-177
99. In: Yzerbyt V.Y., Lories G., and Dardenne B. (Eds). Metacognition. Cognitive and social dimensions (1998), Sage, London
100. Zhao Y. Social studies teachers' perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 (2007) 311-333