Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: A study of what works for whom and why

Medical Education

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 307-320

  Lefroy, Janet ^a   Hawarden, Ashley ^a   Gay, Simon P ^a   Mckinley, Robert K ^a   Cleland, Jennifer ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; UNITED KINGDOM; WORKPLACE;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; SELF EFFICACY; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84922969182     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12659     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
2. Norcini J. The power of feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:16-7.
3. Carless D, Salter D, Yang M, Lam J. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Stud High Educ 2011;36 (4):395-407.
4. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007;29 (9):855-71.
5. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger J, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006;28 (2):117-28.
6. Gibbs G. How assessment frames student learning. In: Bryan C, Clegg K, eds. Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge 2006;23-36.
7. Weaver MR. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assess Eval High Educ 2006;31 (3):379-94.
8. Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A. Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teach High Educ 2001;6 (2):269.
9. Poulos A, Mahony MJ. Effectiveness of feedback: the students' perspective. Assess Eval High Educ 2008;33 (2):143-54.
10. Kluger A, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119 (2):254.
11. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res 2008;78 (1):153-89.
12. Urquhart LM, Rees CE, Ker JS. Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi-school study of medical students' narratives. Med Educ 2014;48:189-203.
13. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003;138 (6):476-81.
14. McKinley RK, Fraser RC, van der Vleuten CPM, Hastings AM. Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the Leicester Assessment Package. Med Educ 2000;34:573-9.
15. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: The Duties of a Doctor Registered with the General Medical Council. London: GMC 2009.
16. Eva K, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 2005;80 (10 Suppl):46-54.
17. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sergeant J. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17 (1):15-26.
18. Murdoch-Eaton D, Sargeant J. Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback. Med Educ 2012;46:711-21.
19. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CPM, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Understanding responses to feedback: the potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Med Educ 2012;46:593-603.
20. Molloy E, Boud D. Seeking a different angle on feedback in clinical education: the learner as seeker, judge and user of performance information. Med Educ 2013;47:227-9.
21. Sitzmann T, Ely K. A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychol Bull 2011;137 (3):421-42.
22. Kluger AN, van Dijk D. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ 2010;44:1166-74.
23. Govaerts M, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, Muijtjens A. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007;12 (2):239-60.
24. Monrouxe L, Rees C, Lewis N, Cleland J. Medical educators' social acts of explaining passing underperformance in students: a qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16 (2):239-52.
25. Cleland JA, Knight LV, Rees CE, Tracey S, Bond CM. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Med Educ 2008;42:800-9.
26. Holmboe E, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot S. Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 2004;2:558-61.
27. Yeates P, O'Neill P, Mann K, Eva K. Seeing the same thing differently: mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013;18 (3):325-41.
28. Altahawi F, Sisk B, Poloskey S, Hicks C, Dannefer EF. Student perspectives on assessment: experience in a competency-based portfolio system. Med Teach 2012;34 (3):221-5.
29. Manzone J, Tremblay L, You-Ten KE, Desai D, Brydges R. Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training. Med Educ 2014;48:430-40.
30. Harrison CJ, Könings KD, Molyneux A, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten CPM. Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? Med Educ 2013;47:734-44.
31. Sinclair HK, Cleland JA. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ 2007;41:580-2.
32. Higgins E. Making a good decision: value from fit. Am Psychol 2000;55 (11):1217-30.
33. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach 2011;33 (6):478-85.
34. Galbraith RM. Got feedback? Med Educ 2013;47:224-5.
35. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications 1997.
36. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ 2012;46:89-96.
37. Lefroy J, Gay SP, Gibson S, Williams S, McKinley RK. Development and face validation of an instrument to assess and improve clinical consultation skills. Int J Clin Skills 2011;5 (2):115-25.
38. Lefroy J, Thomas A, Harrison C, Williams S, O'Mahony F, Gay S, Kinston R, McKinley RK. Development and face validation of strategies for improving consultation skills. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19 (5):661-85.
39. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage Publications 2006.
40. Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 2006;31 (2):199-218.
41. Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JPI, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DADC, van der Vleuten CPM. Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ 2013;47 (3):282-91.