Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships

Medical Education

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 282-291

  Bok, Harold G J ^a   Teunissen, Pim W ^b,c   Spruijt, Annemarie ^a   Fokkema, Joanne P I ^d   van Beukelen, Peter ^a   Jaarsma, Debbie A D C ^e   van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; ANIMALS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, VETERINARY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STUDENTS, HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873596581     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12054     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME guide no. 7. Med Teach 2006;28 (2):117-28.
2. Rolfe IE, Sanson-Fisher RW. Translating learning principles into practice: a new strategy for learning clinical skills. Med Educ 2002;36 (4):345-52.
3. Irby DM. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70 (10):898-931.
4. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education?Med Educ 2008;42 (2):189-97.
5. Sender Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach 2005;27 (5):470-2.
6. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
7. Kilminster SM, Jolly BC. Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review. Med Educ 2000;34 (10):827-40.
8. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Essed GM, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM. The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Acad Med 2002;77 (4):332-5.
9. Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 2008;337:1292-4.
10. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44 (1):101-8.
11. Molloy E. Time to pause: giving and receiving feedback in clinical education. In: Delany C, Molloy E, eds. Clinical Education in the Health Professions. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier 2009;128-45.
12. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behaviour in relation to night shifts. Acad Med 2009;84 (7):910-7.
13. Janssen O, Prins J. Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback information. J Occup Organ Psychol 2007;80 (2):235-49.
14. Ashford SJ, Cummings LL. Feedback as an individual resource: personal strategies of creating information. Organ Behav Hum Perform 1983;32 (3):370-98.
15. Davis W, Fedor DB. The Role of Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy in Detecting Responses to Feedback. Fort Belvoir, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 1998;1-44.
16. Ang S, Cummings LL, Straub DW, Earley PC. The effects of information technology and the perceived mood of the feedback giver on feedback seeking. Inform Syst Res 1993;4 (3):240-61.
17. Ashford SJ. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resource perspective. Acad Manag J 1986;29 (3):465-87.
18. Northcraft GB, Ashford SJ. The preservation of self in everyday life: the effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1990;47 (1):42-64.
19. VandeWalle D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educ Psychol Measur 1997;57 (6):995-1015.
20. VandeWalle D. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behaviour. Hum Resource Manag Rev 2003;13 (4):581-604.
21. Tuckey M, Brewer N, Williamson P. The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking. J Occup Organ Psychol 2002;75 (2):195-216.
22. Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D. Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behaviour in organisations. J Manag 2003;29 (6):773-800.
23. Dweck CS, Grant H. Self-theories, goals, and meaning. In: Shah JY, Gardner WL, eds. Handbook of Motivation Science. New York, NY: Guilford Press 2008;405-16.
24. Dweck CS. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press 2000;15-9.
25. Vancouver JB, Morrison EW. Feedback inquiry: the effect of source attributes and individual differences. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1995;62 (3):276-85.
26. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Worth Publishers 1997;212-58.
27. Remmen R, Denekens J, Scherpbier AJJA, Hermann I, van der Vleuten CPM, van Royen P, Bossaert L. An evaluation study of the didactic quality of clerkships. Med Educ 2000;34 (6):460-4.
28. Billett S. Workplace participatory practices: conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. J Workplace Learn 2004;16 (6):312-24.
29. van der Hem-Stokroos HH, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM, de Vries H, Haarman HJTM. How effective is a clerkship as a learning environment?Med Teach 2001;23 (6):599-604.
30. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ 2010;44 (4):358-66.
31. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2005;191-215.
32. Rowlands BH. Grounded in practice: using interpretive research to build theory. Elec J Business Res Method 2005;3 (1):81-92.
33. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 2002;207-351.
34. Mays N, Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000;320:50-2.
35. King N. Using templates in the thematic analysis of texts. In: Cassell C, Symon G, eds. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: Sage Publications 2004;256-70.
36. Anseel F, Lievens F, Levy PE. A self-motives perspective on feedback-seeking behaviour: linking organisational behaviour and social psychology research. Int J Manag Rev 2007;9 (3):211-36.
37. Goffman E. Embarrassment and social organisation. Am J Sociol 1956;62 (3):264-71.