Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training

Medical Education

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 430-440

  Manzone, Julian ^a   Tremblay, Luc ^a   You Ten, Kong E ^a   Desai, Devdatta ^a   Brydges, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HAND; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HAND; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; MANIKINS; MENTAL RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84897743539     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12397     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
2. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 2006;28 (2):117-28.
3. Wulf G, Shea CH. Understanding the role of augmented feedback. In: Williams M, Hodges N, eds. Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge 2004;121-44.
4. Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 2010;44:75-84.
5. Walsh CM, Ling SC, Wang CS, Carnahan H. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Acad Med 2009;84 (10 Suppl):54-7.
6. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008;42:189-97.
7. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17 (1):15-26.
8. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44:101-8.
9. Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Spruijt A, Fokkema JP, van Beukelen P, Jaarsma DADC, van der Vleuten CPM. Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behaviour in clinical clerkships. Med Educ 2013;47 (3):282-91.
10. Butler R, Nisan M. Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. J Educ Psychol 1986;78 (3):210-6.
11. Butler R. Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. J Educ Psychol 1987;79 (4):474-82.
12. Butler R. What young people want to know when: effects of mastery and ability goals on interest in different kinds of social comparisons. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992;62 (1):934-43.
13. Butler R. Effects of task- and ego-achievement goals on information seeking during task engagement. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65 (1):18-31.
14. Butler R, Neuman O. Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviours and attitudes. J Educ Psychol 1995;87 (2):261-71.
15. Page EB. Teacher comments and student performance: a seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. J Educ Psychol 1958;49 (4):173-81.
16. Brutus S. Words versus numbers: a theoretical exploration of giving and receiving narrative comments in performance appraisal. Hum Resour Manag Rev 2010;20 (2):144-57.
17. Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, Dubrowski A. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 2007;193 (1):105-10.
18. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250 (6):777-81.
19. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten C. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med 2010;85 (7):1212-20.
20. Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med 2011;86 (9):1120-7.
21. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 'Directed' self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28 (1):47-54.
22. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14 (3):399-410.
23. Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Loney E, Mann K, Sargeant J. Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach 2011;33 (2):113-20.
24. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13 (3):275-88.
25. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 4th edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2005;537.
26. Brydges R, Nair P, Ma I, Shanks D, Hatala R. Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 2012;46 (7):648-56.
27. Kabrhel C, Thomsen TW, Setnik GS, Walls RM. Videos in clinical medicine. Orotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (17):e15.
28. Hatala RM, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Practice makes perfect: the critical role of mixed practice in the acquisition of ECG interpretation skills. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2003;8 (1):17-26.
29. Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A. The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193 (5):479-85.
30. Datta V, Chang A, Mackay S, Darzi A. The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments. Am J Surg 2002;184 (1):70-3.
31. van Hove PD, Tuijthof GJM, Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Dankelman J. Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg 2010;97 (7):972-87.
32. Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer JM, Loney E, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CPM. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Educ 2011;45:636-47.
33. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006;119 (2):166.e7-16.
34. Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra S, Hatala R. Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality. Acad Med 2013;88 (6):872-83.
35. Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra S, Hatala R, Brydges R. What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013; in press.
36. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, Reznick RK, Matsumoto ED, Sidhu RS, Jarvi KA. Validation of novel and objective measures of microsurgical skill: hand-motion analysis and stereoscopic visual acuity. Microsurgery 2003;23 (4):317-22.
37. Hayter MA, Friedman Z, Bould MD, Hanlon JG, Katznelson R, Borges B, Naik VN. Validation of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) for labour epidural placement. Can J Anaesth 2009;56 (6):419-26.
38. Merbah S, Meulemans T. Learning a motor skill: effects of blocked versus random practice a review. Psychol Belg 2011;51 (1):15-48.
39. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualisations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci 1992;3 (4):207-17.
40. Brydges R, Dubrowski A, Regehr G. A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions. Acad Med 2010;85 (10 Suppl):49-55.
41. Dubrowski A. Performance vs. learning curves: what is motor learning and how is it measured? Surg Endosc 2005;19 (9):1290.
42. Kennedy TJT, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard LA. 'It"s a cultural expectation...' The pressure on medical trainees to work independently in clinical practice. Med Educ 2009;43:645-53.
43. Eva KW, Munoz J, Hanson MD, Walsh A, Wakefield J. Which factors, personal or external, most influence students' generation of learning goals? Acad Med 2010;85 (10 Suppl):102-5.