Directed evolution of stereoselective enzymes based on genetic selection as opposed to screening systems

Journal of Biotechnology

Volumn 191, Issue , 2014, Pages 3-10

  Acevedo Rocha, Carlos G ^a,b   Agudo, Ruben ^a,b   Reetz, Manfred T ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KOHLENFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biocatalysis; Directed evolution; Display systems; FACS; Metabolic engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOCATALYSTS; DISPLAY DEVICES; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; STEREOSELECTIVITY;

ASYMMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS; BIOCATALYSIS; DIRECTED EVOLUTION; DISPLAY SYSTEM; FACS; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING SYSTEMS; ORGANIC CHEMISTRY;

ENZYMES;

AMINO ACID; ENZYME;

ARTICLE; BIOCATALYST; CELL SELECTION; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; POLYMERIZATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; BIOCATALYSIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GREEN CHEMISTRY;

BIOCATALYSIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DIRECTED MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; ENZYMES; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GREEN CHEMISTRY TECHNOLOGY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84911915299     PISSN: 01681656     EISSN: 18734863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Acevedo-Rocha C.G., Kille S., Reetz M.T. Iterative saturation mutagenesis: a powerful approach to engineer proteins by systematically simulating Darwinian evolution. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, (in press).
2. Aharoni A., Griffiths A.D., Tawfik D.S. High-throughput screens and selections of enzyme-encoding genes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9:210-216.
3. Aharoni A., Thieme K., Chiu C.P.C., Buchini S., Lairson L.L., Chen H.M., Strynadka N.C.J., Wakarchuk W.W., Withers S.G. High-throughput screening methodology for the directed evolution of glycosyltransferases. Nat. Methods 2006, 3:609-614.
4. Baxter S., Royer S., Grogan G., Brown F., Holt-Tiffin K.E., Taylor I.N., Fotheringham I.G., Campopiano D.J. An improved racemase/acylase biotransformation for the preparation of enantiomerically pure amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:19310-19313.
5. Becker S., Hobenreich H., Vogel A., Knorr J., Wilhelm S., Rosenau F., Jaeger K.E., Reetz M.T., Kolmar H. Single-cell high-throughput screening to identify enantioselective hydrolytic enzymes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47:5085-5088.
6. Becker S., Schmoldt H.U., Adams T.M., Wilhelm S., Kolmar H. Ultra-high-throughput screening based on cell-surface display and fluorescence-activated cell sorting for the identification of novel biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15:323-329.
7. Blaser H.-U., Schmidt E. Asymmetric Catalysis on Industrial Scales 2004, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
8. Boersma Y.L., Droge M.J., van der Sloot A.M., Pijning T., Cool R.H., Dijkstra B.W., Quax W.J. A novel genetic selection system for improved enantioselectivity of Bacillus subtilis lipase A. ChemBioChem 2008, 9:1110-1115.
9. Bornscheuer U.T., Altenbuchner J., Meyer H.H. Directed evolution of an esterase for the stereoselective resolution of a key intermediate in the synthesis of epothilones. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 58:554-559.
10. Bornscheuer U.T., Huisman G.W., Kazlauskas R.J., Lutz S., Moore J.C., Robins K. Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature 2012, 485:185-194.
11. Bosley A.D., Ostermeier M. Mathematical expressions useful in the construction, description and evaluation of protein libraries. Biomol. Eng. 2005, 22:57-61.
12. Chaparro-Riggers J.F., Polizzi K.M., Bommarius A.S. Better library design: data-driven protein engineering. Biotechnol. J. 2007, 2:180-191.
13. Chen I., Dorr B.M., Liu D.R. A general strategy for the evolution of bond-forming enzymes using yeast display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:11399-11404.
14. Denault M., Pelletier J.N. Protein Engineering Protocols 2007, vol. 352:127-154. Humana Press, New Jersey.
15. Diamante L., Gatti-Lafranconi P., Schaerli Y., Hollfelder F. In vitro affinity screening of protein and peptide binders by megavalent bead surface display. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2013, 26:713-724.
16. Drauz K., Gröger H., May O. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis 2012, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. 3rd ed.
17. Dröge M.J., Boersma Y.L., van Pouderoyen G., Vrenken T.E., Ruggeberg C.J., Reetz M.T., Dijkstra B.W., Quax W.J. Directed evolution of Bacillus subtilis lipase A by use of enantiomeric phosphonate inhibitors: crystal structures and phage display selection. ChemBioChem 2006, 7:149-157.
18. Esvelt K.M., Carlson J.C., Liu D.R. A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature 2011, 472:U499-U550.
19. Farinas E.T. Fluorescence activated cell sorting for enzymatic activity. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2006, 9:321-328.
20. Fernandez-Alvaro E., Snajdrova R., Jochens H., Davids T., Bottcher D., Bornscheuer U.T. A combination of in vivo selection and cell sorting for the identification of enantioselective biocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:8584-8587.
21. Goldsmith M., Tawfik D.S. Directed enzyme evolution: beyond the low-hanging fruit. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22:406-412.
22. Griffiths A.D., Tawfik D.S. Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24:395-402.
23. Griswold K.E., Kawarasaki Y., Ghoneim N., Benkovic S.J., Iverson B.L., Georgiou G. Evolution of highly active enzymes by homology-independent recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2005, 102:10082-10087.
24. Hwang B.Y., Oh J.M., Kim J., Kim B.G. Pro-antibiotic substrates for the identification of enantioselective hydrolases. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006, 28:1181-1185.
25. Jochens H., Bornscheuer U.T. Natural diversity to guide focused directed evolution. ChemBioChem 2010, 11:1861-1866.
26. Juergens C., Strom A., Wegener D., Hettwer S., Wilmanns M., Sterner R. Directed evolution of a (beta alpha)8-barrel enzyme to catalyze related reactions in two different metabolic pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:9925-9930.
27. Levin A.M., Weiss G.A. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. Mol. Biosyst. 2006, 2:49-57.
28. Li H., Liao J.C. Development of an NADPH-dependent homophenylalanine dehydrogenase by protein engineering. ACS Synth. Biol. 2013, 3:13-20.
29. Lin H.N., Cornish V.W. Screening and selection methods for large-scale analysis of protein function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41:4403-4425.
30. Lipovsek D., Antipov E., Armstrong K.A., Olsen M.J., Klibanov A.M., Tidor B., Wittrup K.D. Selection of horseradish peroxidase variants with enhanced enantioselectivity by yeast surface display. Chem. Biol. 2007, 14:1176-1185.
31. Lutz S., Bornscheuer U.T. Protein Engineering Handbook 2009, vols. 1 and 2. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH.
32. Mastrobattista E., Taly V., Chanudet E., Treacy P., Kelly B.T., Griffiths A.D. High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: in vitro evolution of a beta-galactosidase by fluorescence-activated sorting of double emulsions. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12:1291-1300.
33. Neuenschwander M., Butz M., Heintz C., Kast P., Hilvert D. A simple selection strategy for evolving highly efficient enzymes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:1145-1147.
34. Nov Y. When second best Is good enough: another probabilistic look at saturation mutagenesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78:258-262.
35. Olsen M.J., Stephens D., Griffiths D., Daugherty P., Georgiou G., Iverson B.L. Function-based isolation of novel enzymes from a large library. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:1071-1074.
36. Parra L.P., Agudo R., Reetz M.T. Directed Evolution by using iterative saturation mutagenesis based on multiresidue sites. ChemBioChem 2013, 14:2301-2309.
37. Patrick W.M., Firth A.E. Strategies and computational tools for improving randomized protein libraries. Biomol. Eng. 2005, 22:105-112.
38. Reetz M.T. An overview of high-throughput screening systems for enantioselective enzymatic transformations. Methods in Molecular Biology 2003, vol. 230:259-282. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
39. Reetz M.T. Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: practical and theoretical ramifications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:5716-5722.
40. Reetz M.T. Laboratory evolution of stereoselective enzymes: a prolific source of catalysts for asymmetric reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50:138-174.
41. Reetz M.T. Biocatalysis in organic chemistry and biotechnology: past, present, and future. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135:12480-12496.
42. Reetz M.T., Becker M.H., Klein H.W., Stockigt D. A method for high-throughput screening of enantioselective catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38:1758-1761.
43. Reetz M.T., Bocola M., Carballeira J.D., Zha D.X., Vogel A. Expanding the range of substrate acceptance of enzymes: combinatorial active-site saturation test. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44:4192-4196.
44. Reetz M.T., Carballeira J.D. Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:891-903.
45. Reetz M.T., Hobenreich H., Soni P., Fernandez L. A genetic selection system for evolving enantioselectivity of enzymes. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5502-5504.
46. Reetz M.T., Ruggeberg C.J. A screening system for enantioselective enzymes based on differential cell growth. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1428-1429.
47. Reetz M.T., Ruggeberg C.J., Droge M.J., Quax W.J. Immobilization of chiral enzyme inhibitors on solid supports by amide-forming coupling and olefin metathesis. Tetrahedron 2002, 58:8465-8473.
48. Reetz M.T., Wang L.W. High-throughput selection system for assessing the activity of epoxide hydrolases. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2006, 9:295-299.
49. Reetz M.T., Wilensek S., Zha D.X., Jaeger K.E. Directed evolution of an enantioselective enzyme through combinatorial multiple-cassette mutagenesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40:3589-3591.
50. Reetz M.T., Wu S. Greatly reduced amino acid alphabets in directed evolution: making the right choice for saturation mutagenesis at homologous enzyme positions. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5499-5501.
51. Reetz M.T., Zonta A., Schimossek K., Liebeton K., Jaeger K.E. Creation of enantioselective biocatalysts for organic chemistry by in vitro evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36:2830-2832.
52. Reymond J.-L. Enzyme Assays: High-throughput Screening, Genetic Selection and Fingerprinting 2006, Wiley-VCH-Verlag, Weinheim.
53. Santoro S.W., Schultz P.G. Directed evolution of the site specificity of Cre recombinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:4185-4190.
54. Schuster S., Enzelberger M., Trauthwein H., Schmid R.D., Urlacher V.B. pHluorin-based in vivo assay for hydrolase screening. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:2727-2732.
55. Sidhu S.S. Phage Display in Biotechnology and Drug Discovery 2005, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
56. Stemmer W.P. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature 1994, 370:389-391.
57. Taylor S.V., Kast P., Hilvert D. Investigating and engineering enzymes by genetic selection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40:3310-3335.
58. Tracewell C.A., Arnold F.H. Directed enzyme evolution: climbing fitness peaks one amino acid at a time. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13:3-9.
59. Trapp O. Boosting the throughput of separation techniques by multiplexing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46:5609-5613.
60. Turner N.J. Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:567-573.
61. van Sint Fiet S., van Beilen J.B., Witholt B. Selection of biocatalysts for chemical synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:1693-1698.
62. Wilhelm S., Rosenau F., Becker S., Buest S., Hausmann S., Kolmar H., Jaeger K.E. Functional cell-surface display of a lipase-specific chaperone. ChemBioChem 2007, 8:55-60.
63. Yang G.Y., Withers S.G. Ultrahigh-throughput FACS-based screening for directed enzyme evolution. ChemBioChem 2009, 10:2704-2715.
64. Yano T., Oue S., Kagamiyama H. Directed evolution of an aspartate aminotransferase with new substrate specificities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:5511-5515.