A combination of in vivo selection and cell sorting for the identification of enantioselective biocatalysts

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 50, Issue 37, 2011, Pages 8584-8587

  Fernández Álvaro, Elena ^a   Snajdrova, Radka ^a   Jochens, Helge ^a   Davids, Timo ^a   Böttcher, Dominique ^a   Bornscheuer, Uwe T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

biocatalysis; directed evolution; enantioselectivity; flow cytometry; in vivo selection

Indexed keywords

BIOCATALYSIS; CELL SORTING; DIRECTED EVOLUTION; ENANTIOSELECTIVE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; IN VIVO SELECTION; IN-LINE; IN-VIVO; MUTANT LIBRARIES;

CELL DEATH; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GLYCEROL; GROWTH KINETICS; HYDROLYSIS;

ENZYMES;

2,3 DIBROMOPROPANOL; 2,3-DIBROMOPROPANOL; 3 PHENYLBUTYRIC ACID; 3-PHENYLBUTYRIC ACID; ARYLBUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARBOXYLIC ACID; ESTERASE; GLYCEROL; PROPANOL;

ARTICLE; BIOCATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLOW CYTOMETRY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; STEREOISOMERISM;

BIOCATALYSIS; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESTERASES; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GLYCEROL; KINETICS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHENYLBUTYRATES; PROPANOLS; STEREOISOMERISM; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052487039     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102360     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. R. J. Kazlauskas, U. T. Bornscheuer, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 526-529
2. Protein Engineering Handbook (Eds.: S. Lutz, U. T. Bornscheuer), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2009
3. M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 2144-2182
4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 138-174.
5. Evolutionary Methods in Biotechnology (Eds.: S. Brakmann, A. Schwienhorst), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004
6. F. H. Arnold, G. Georgiou, in Methods in Molecular Biology,(Eds.:), Vol. 230, Humana Press, Totawa, 2003, pp. 387-390
7. J. P. Goddard, J.-L. Reymond, Trends Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 363-370
8. Enzyme assays, (Ed., J. L. Reymond,), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005.
9. A. Aharoni, A. D. Griffiths, D. S. Tawfik, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 210-216
10. A. Aharoni, G. Amitai, K. Bernath, S. Magdassi, D. S. Tawfik, Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 1281-1289
11. A. D. Griffiths, D. S. Tawfik, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 338-353
12. O. J. Miller, K. Bernath, J. J. Agresti, G. Amitai, B. T. Kelly, E. Mastrobattista, V. Taly, S. Magdassi, D. S. Tawfik, A. D. Griffiths, Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 561-570.
13. S. Becker, H. Hobenreich, A. Vogel, J. Knorr, S. Wilhelm, F. Rosenau, K. E. Jaeger, M. T. Reetz, H. Kolmar, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 5163-5166
14. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5085-5088.
15. F. Zocher, N. Krebsfänger, O. J. Yoo, U. T. Bornscheuer, J. Mol. Catal. B 1998, 5, 199-202.
16. M. T. Reetz, A. Zonta, K. Schimossek, K. Liebeton, K.-E. Jaeger, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 2961-2963
17. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 2830-2832
18. M. Schmidt, D. Hasenpusch, M. Kähler, U. Kirchner, K. Wiggenhorn, W. Langel, U. T. Bornscheuer, ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 805-809.
19. S. Bartsch, R. Kourist, U. T. Bornscheuer, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 1531-1534
20. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1508-1511.
21. C. M. Sprout, C. T. Seto, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5099-5102.
22. F. Taran, C. Gauchet, B. Mohar, S. Meunier, A. Valleix, P. Y. Renard, C. Creminon, J. Grassi, A. Wagner, C. Mioskowski, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 132-135
23. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 124-127
24. M. Matsushita, K. Yoshida, N. Yamamoto, P. Wirsching, R. A. Lerner, K. D. Janda, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 6166-6169
25. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5984-5987.
26. M. T. Reetz, C. J. Rüggeberg, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1428-1429.
27. M. T. Reetz, H. Hobenreich, P. Soni, L. Fernandez, Chem. Commun. 2008, 5502-5504.
28. Y. L. Boersma, M. J. Droge, A. M. van der Sloot, T. Pijning, R. H. Cool, B. W. Dijkstra, W. J. Quax, ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1110-1115.
29. G. Yang, S. G. Withers, ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2704-2715.
30. 2,3-Dibromopropanol turned out to be the best compound after extensive investigation of various halo alcohols (data not shown) with respect to criteria, such as high toxicity of the halo alcohol vs. low toxicity of its ester on growth of E. coli, stability, and solubility in an aqueous system.
31. M. Schmidt, E. Henke, B. Heinze, R. Kourist, A. Hidalgo, U. T. Bornscheuer, Biotechnol. J. 2006, 2, 249-253.
32. Y. Hotta, S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, T. Imanaka, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3925-3931.
33. C. Schmeisser, C. Stockigt, C. Raasch, J. Wingender, K. N. Timmis, D. F. Wenderoth, H. C. Flemming, H. Liesegang, R. A. Schmitz, K. E. Jaeger, W. R. Streit, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7298-7309.
34. E. Henke, U. T. Bornscheuer, Biol. Chem. 1999, 380, 1029-1033
35. F. Zocher, N. Krebsfänger, O. J. Yoo, U. T. Bornscheuer, J. Mol. Catal. B 1998, 5, 199-202.
36. S. Park, K. L. Morley, G. P. Horsman, M. Holmquist, K. Hult, R. J. Kazlauskas, Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 45-54.
37. H. Jochens, U. T. Bornscheuer, ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1861-1866.
38. true values (, L. E. Janes, R. J. Kazlauskas, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4560-4561) and because with substrates 1 and 2 we selected substrates structurally close to the ethyl ester 3, but significantly different from the pNP esters confirming the "you get what you screen for" rule.