Engineering of synthetic cellular microenvironments: Implications for immunity

Journal of Autoimmunity

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 100-111

  Adutler Lieber, Shimrit ^a   Zaretsky, Irina ^a   Platzman, Ilia ^b   Deeg, Janosch ^b   Friedman, Nir ^a   Spatz, Joachim P ^b   Geiger, Benjamin ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion signaling; Antigen presentation; Cell adhesion; Immune niche; Mechanobiology; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

BIOMIMETICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL FATE; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IMMUNITY; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; MICROENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNTHETIC CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; ANIMAL; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL;

ANIMALS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BIOMIMETICS; CELL ADHESION; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84908479357     PISSN: 08968411     EISSN: 10959157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.05.003     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Sela M., Arnon R. Studies on the chemical basis of the antigenicity of proteins. 3. The role of rigidity in the antigenicity of polypeptidyl gelatins. Biochem J 1960, 77:394-399.
2. Sela M., Arnon R. Studies on the chemical basis of the antigenicity of proteins. 1. Antigenicity of polypeptidyl gelatins. Biochem J 1960, 75:91-102.
3. Arnon R., Sela M. Studies on the chemical basis of the antigenicity of proteins. 2. Antigenic specificity of polytyrosyl gelatins. Biochem J 1960, 75:103-109.
4. Teitelbaum D., Webb C., Meshorer A., Arnon R., Sela M. Protection against experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Nature 1972, 240:564-566.
5. Chautard E., Fatoux-Ardore M., Ballut L., Thierry-Mieg N., Ricard-Blum S. MatrixDB, the extracellular matrix interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D235-D240.
6. Winograd-Katz S.E., Fassler R., Geiger B., Legate K.R. The integrin adhesome: from genes and proteins to human disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014, 15:273-288.
7. Zaidel-Bar R. Cadherin adhesome at a glance. JCell Sci 2013, 126:373-378.
8. Zaidel-Bar R., Itzkovitz S., Ma'ayan A., Iyengar R., Geiger B. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:858-867.
9. Zaidel-Bar R., Geiger B. The switchable integrin adhesome. JCell Sci 2010, 123:1385-1388.
10. Geiger B., Bershadsky A. Exploring the neighborhood: adhesion-coupled cell mechanosensors. Cell 2002, 110:139-142.
11. Bershadsky A.D., Balaban N.Q., Geiger B. Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003, 19:677-695.
12. Chen C.S. Mechanotransduction - a field pulling together?. JCell Sci 2008, 121:3285-3292.
13. Curtis A., Riehle M. Tissue engineering: the biophysical background. Phys Med Biol 2001, 46:R47-R65.
14. Spatz J.P., Geiger B. Molecular engineering of cellular environments: cell adhesion to nano-digital surfaces. Methods Cell Biol 2007, 83:89-111.
15. Vogel V., Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7:265-275.
16. Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Johnstone H., Affrossman S., Curtis A.S. Invitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 2002, 23:2945-2954.
17. Thery M., Racine V., Piel M., Pepin A., Dimitrov A., Chen Y., et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:19771-19776.
18. Xia N., Thodeti C.K., Hunt T.P., Xu Q., Ho M., Whitesides G.M., et al. Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation. FASEB J: Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 2008, 22:1649-1659.
19. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
20. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
21. Chen C.S., Tan J., Tien J. Mechanotransduction at cell-matrix and cell-cell contacts. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004, 6:275-302.
22. Rumpler M., Woesz A., Dunlop J.W., van Dongen J.T., Fratzl P. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface/Royal Soc 2008, 5:1173-1180.
23. Cukierman E., Pankov R., Stevens D.R., Yamada K.M. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001, 294:1708-1712.
24. Hersel U., Dahmen C., Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4385-4415.
25. Arnold M., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Glass R., Blummel J., Eck W., Kantlehner M., et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem: Eur J Chem Phys Phys Chem 2004, 5:383-388.
26. Chen C.S., Mrksich M., Huang S., Whitesides G.M., Ingber D.E. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 1997, 276:1425-1428.
27. Bershadsky A., Kozlov M., Geiger B. Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006, 18:472-481.
28. Berrier A.L., Yamada K.M. Cell-matrix adhesion. JCell Physiol 2007, 213:565-573.
29. Delon I., Brown N.H. Integrins and the actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007, 19:43-50.
30. Lock J.G., Wehrle-Haller B., Stromblad S. Cell-matrix adhesion complexes: master control machinery of cell migration. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18:65-76.
31. Danen E.H., Sonneveld P., Brakebusch C., Fassler R., Sonnenberg A. The fibronectin-binding integrins alpha5beta1 and alphavbeta3 differentially modulate RhoA-GTP loading, organization of cell matrix adhesions, and fibronectin fibrillogenesis. JCell Biol 2002, 159:1071-1086.
32. Katz B.Z., Zamir E., Bershadsky A., Kam Z., Yamada K.M., Geiger B. Physical state of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure and molecular composition of cell-matrix adhesions. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:1047-1060.
33. Rosenberg S.A. Progress in human tumour immunology and immunotherapy. Nature 2001, 411:380-384.
34. Weigelin B., Krause M., Friedl P. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte migration and effector function in the tumor microenvironment. Immunol Lett 2011, 138:19-21.
35. Gerard A., Khan O., Beemiller P., Oswald E., Hu J., Matloubian M., et al. Secondary T cell-T cell synaptic interactions drive the differentiation of protective CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol 2013, 14:356-363.
36. Xie J.T.C., Davis M.M. How the immune system talks to itself: the varied role of synapses. Immunol Rev 2013, 251:14.
37. von Andrian U.H., Mempel T.R. Homing and cellular traffic in lymph nodes. Nat Rev Immunol 2003, 3:867-878.
38. Willard-Mack C.L. Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes. Toxicol Pathol 2006, 34:409-424.
39. Ruco L.P., Pomponi D., Pigott R., Gearing A.J., Baiocchini A., Baroni C.D. Expression and cell distribution of the intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule, endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule, and endothelial cell adhesion molecule (CD31) in reactive human lymph nodes and in Hodgkin's disease. Am J Pathol 1992, 140:1337-1344.
40. Gretz J.E., Kaldjian E.P., Anderson A.O., Shaw S. Sophisticated strategies for information encounter in the lymph node: the reticular network as a conduit of soluble information and a highway for cell traffic. JImmunol 1996, 157:495-499.
41. Kaldjian E.P., Gretz J.E., Anderson A.O., Shi Y., Shaw S. Spatial and molecular organization of lymph node T cell cortex: a labyrinthine cavity bounded by an epithelium-like monolayer of fibroblastic reticular cells anchored to basement membrane-like extracellular matrix. Int Immunol 2001, 13:1243-1253.
42. Cupedo T., Stroock A., Coles M. Application of tissue engineering to the immune system: development of artificial lymph nodes. Front Immunol 2012, 3:343.
43. Tan J.K., Watanabe T. Artificial engineering of secondary lymphoid organs. Adv Immunol 2010, 105:131-157.
44. Irvine D.J., Stachowiak A.N., Hori Y. Lymphoid tissue engineering: invoking lymphoid tissue neogenesis in immunotherapy and models of immunity. Semin Immunol 2008, 20:137-146.
45. Kobayashi Y., Kato K., Watanabe T. Synthesis of functional artificial lymphoid tissues. Discov Med 2011, 12:351-362.
46. Tibbitt M.W., Anseth K.S. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009, 103:655-663.
47. Holmes B., Castro N.J., Zhang L.G., Zussman E. Electrospun fibrous scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue generation: recent progress and future developments. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2012, 18:478-486.
48. Hughes C.S., Postovit L.M., Lajoie G.A. Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 2010, 10:1886-1890.
49. Okamoto N., Chihara R., Shimizu C., Nishimoto S., Watanabe T. Artificial lymph nodes induce potent secondary immune responses in naive and immunodeficient mice. JClin Invest 2007, 117:997-1007.
50. Mirsadraee S., Wilcox H.E., Korossis S.A., Kearney J.N., Watterson K.G., Fisher J., et al. Development and characterization of an acellular human pericardial matrix for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:763-773.
51. Guillotin B., Guillemot F. Cell patterning technologies for organotypic tissue fabrication. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:183-190.
52. Suematsu S., Watanabe T. Generation of a synthetic lymphoid tissue-like organoid in mice. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:1539-1545.
53. Zheng Y., Chen J., Craven M., Choi N.W., Totorica S., Diaz-Santana A., et al. Invitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:9342-9347.
54. Giese C., Lubitz A., Demmler C.D., Reuschel J., Bergner K., Marx U. Immunological substance testing on human lymphatic micro-organoids invitro. JBiotechnol 2010, 148:38-45.
55. Benezech C., Mader E., Desanti G., Khan M., Nakamura K., White A., et al. Lymphotoxin-beta receptor signaling through NF-kappaB2-RelB pathway reprograms adipocyte precursors as lymph node stromal cells. Immunity 2012, 37:721-734.
56. Germain R.N. T-cell development and the CD4-CD8 lineage decision. Nat Rev Immunol 2002, 2:309-322.
57. Dudley M.E., Rosenberg S.A. Adoptive-cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003, 3:666-675.
58. Gattinoni L., Powell D.J., Rosenberg S.A., Restifo N.P. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: building on success. Nat Rev Immunol 2006, 6:383-393.
59. Yu C.H., Groves J.T. Engineering supported membranes for cell biology. Med Biol Eng Comput 2010, 48:955-963.
60. Sackmann E. Supported membranes: scientific and practical applications. Science 1996, 271:43-48.
61. Groves J.T., Dustin M.L. Supported planar bilayers in studies on immune cell adhesion and communication. JImmunol Methods 2003, 278:19-32.
62. Campi G., Varma R., Dustin M.L. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. JExp Med 2005, 202:1031-1036.
63. Grakoui A., Bromley S.K., Sumen C., Davis M.M., Shaw A.S., Allen P.M., et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999, 285:221-227.
64. DeMond A.L., Mossman K.D., Starr T., Dustin M.L., Groves J.T. Tcell receptor microcluster transport through molecular mazes reveals mechanism of translocation. Biophys J 2008, 94:3286-3292.
65. Kam L.C. Capturing the nanoscale complexity of cellular membranes in supported lipid bilayers. JStruct Biol 2009, 168:3-10.
66. Mossman K.D., Campi G., Groves J.T., Dustin M.L. Altered TCR signaling from geometrically repatterned immunological synapses. Science 2005, 310:1191-1193.
67. Shen K.Y., Tsai J., Shi P., Kam L.C. Self-aligned supported lipid bilayers for patterning the cell-substrate interface. JAm Chem Soc 2009, 131:13204-13205.
68. Shi J.J., Chen J.X., Cremer P.S. Sub-100 nm Patterning of supported bilayers by nanoshaving lithography. JAm Chem Soc 2008, 130:2718-2719.
69. Platzman I., Janiesch J.W., Matic J., Spatz J.P. Artificial antigen-presenting interfaces in the service of immunology. Isr J Chem 2013, 53:655-669.
70. Huppa J.B., Axmann M., Mortelmaier M.A., Lillemeier B.F., Newell E.W., Brameshuber M., et al. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010, 463:963-967.
71. Doh J., Irvine D.J. Immunological synapse arrays: patterned protein surfaces that modulate immunological synapse structure formation in T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:5700-5705.
72. Glass R., Moller M., Spatz J.P. Block copolymer micelle nanolithography. Nanotechnology 2003, 14:1153-1160.
73. Lohmuller T., Aydin D., Schwieder M., Morhard C., Louban I., Pacholski C., et al. Nanopatterning by block copolymer micelle nanolithography and bioinspired applications. Biointerphases 2011, 6:MR1-12.
74. Aydin D., Schwieder M., Louban I., Knoppe S., Ulmer J., Haas T.L., et al. Micro-nanostructured protein arrays: a tool for geometrically controlled ligand presentation. Small 2009, 5:1014-1018.
75. Selhuber-Unkel C., Erdmann T., Lopez-Garcia M., Kessler H., Schwarz U.S., Spatz J.P. Cell adhesion strength is controlled by intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors. Biophys J 2010, 98:543-551.
76. Deeg J.A., Louban I., Aydin D., Selhuber-Unkel C., Kessler H., Spatz J.P. Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. Nano Lett 2011, 11:1469-1476.
77. Arnold M., Hirschfeld-Warneken V.C., Lohmuller T., Heil P., Blummel J., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. Nano Lett 2008, 8:2063-2069.
78. Hirschfeld-Warneken V.C., Arnold M., Cavalcanti-Adam A., López-García M., Kessler H., Spatz J.P. Cell adhesion and polarisation on molecularly defined spacing gradient surfaces of cyclic RGDfK peptide patches. Eur J Cell Biol 2008, 87:743-750.
79. Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Aydin D., Hirschfeld-Warneken V.C., Spatz J.P. Cell adhesion and response to nanopatterned environments by steering receptor clustering and location. HFSP J 2008, 2:276-285.
80. Matic J., Deeg J., Scheffold A., Goldstein I., Spatz J.P. Fine tuning and efficient T cell activation with stimulatory aCD3 nanoarrays. Nano Lett 2013, 13:5090-5097.
81. Deeg J., Axmann M., Matic J., Liapis A., Depoil D., Afrose J., et al. Tcell activation is determined by the number of presented antigens. Nano Lett 2013, 13:5619-5626.
82. Alon R., Dustin M.L. Force as a facilitator of integrin conformational changes during leukocyte arrest on blood vessels and antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 2007, 26:17-27.
83. Li Y.C., Chen B.M., Wu P.C., Cheng T.L., Kao L.S., Tao M.H., et al. Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. JImmunol 2010, 184:5959-5963.
84. Hosseini B.H., Louban I., Djandji D., Wabnitz G.H., Deeg J., Bulbuc N., et al. Immune synapse formation determines interaction forces between T cells and antigen-presenting cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:17852-17857.
85. Judokusumo E., Tabdanov E., Kumari S., Dustin M.L., Kam L.C. Mechanosensing in T Lymphocyte activation. Biophys J 2012, 102:L5-L7.
86. Platzman I., Gadomska K.M., Janiesch J.-W., Louban I., Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., Spatz J.P. Soft/elastic nano-patterned biointerfaces in the service of cell biology. Methods in cell biology 2014, 237-261. Academic Press. M. Piel, M. Théry (Eds.).
87. Platzman I., Muth C.A., Lee-Thedieck C., Pallarola D., Atanasova R., Louban I., et al. Surface properties of nanostructured bio-active interfaces: impacts of surface stiffness and topography on cell-surface interactions. RSC Adv 2013, 3:13293-13303.
88. Graeter S.V., Huang J., Perschmann N., López-García M., Kessler H., Ding J., et al. Mimicking cellular environments by nanostructured soft interfaces. Nano Lett 2007, 7:1413-1418.
89. O'Connor R.S., Hao X.L., Shen K.Y., Bashour K., Akimova T., Hancock W.W., et al. Substrate rigidity regulates human T cell activation and proliferation. JImmunol 2012, 189:1330-1339.
90. Restifo N.P., Dudley M.E., Rosenberg S.A. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 2012, 12:269-281.
91. Mescher M.F. Surface-contact requirements for activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes-T. JImmunol 1992, 149:2402-2405.
92. Wei X.B., Tromberg B.J., Cahalan M.D. Mapping the sensitivity of T cells with an optical trap: polarity and minimal number of receptors for Ca2+ signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:8471-8476.
93. Deeths M.J., Kedl R.M., Mescher M.F. CD8(+) T cells become nonresponsive (anergic) following activation in the presence of costimulation. JImmunol 1999, 163:102-110.
94. Carpentier B., Pierobon P., Hivroz C., Henry N. T-cell artificial focal triggering tools: linking surface interactions with cell response. Plos One 2009, 4.
95. Levine B.L., Bernstein W.B., Connors M., Craighead N., Lindsten T., Thompson C.B., et al. Effects of CD28 costimulation on long-term proliferation of CD4(+) T cells in the absence of exogenous feeder cells. JImmunol 1997, 159:5921-5930.
96. Deeths M.J., Mescher M.F. ICAM-1 and B7-1 provide similar but distinct costimulation for CD8(+) T cells, while CD4(+) T cells are poorly costimulated by ICAM-1. Eur J Immunol 1999, 29:45-53.
97. Platzman I., Janiesch J.-W., Spatz J.P. Synthesis of nanostructured and biofunctionalized water-in-oil droplets as tools for homing T cells. JAm Chem Soc 2013, 135:3339-3342.
98. Tay S., Hughey J.J., Lee T.K., Lipniacki T., Quake S.R., Covert M.W. Single-cell NF-kappaB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 2010, 466:267-271.
99. Wu M., Perroud T.D., Srivastava N., Branda C.S., Sale K.L., Carson B.D., et al. Microfluidically-unified cell culture, sample preparation, imaging and flow cytometry for measurement of cell signaling pathways with single cell resolution. Lab Chip 2012, 12:2823-2831.
100. Srivastava N., Brennan J.S., Renzi R.F., Wu M., Branda S.S., Singh A.K., et al. Fully integrated microfluidic platform enabling automated phosphoprofiling of macrophage response. Anal Chem 2009, 81:3261-3269.
101. Cheong R., Wang C.J., Levchenko A. High content cell screening in a microfluidic device. Mol Cell Proteomics: MCP 2009, 8:433-442.
102. Albrecht D.R., Underhill G.H., Resnikoff J., Mendelson A., Bhatia S.N., Shah J.V. Microfluidics-integrated time-lapse imaging for analysis of cellular dynamics. Integr Biol: Quantitative Biosciences from nano to macro 2010, 2:278-287.
103. Haessler U., Pisano M., Wu M., Swartz M.A. Dendritic cell chemotaxis in 3D under defined chemokine gradients reveals differential response to ligands CCL21 and CCL19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:5614-5619.
104. Jones C.N., Dalli J., Dimisko L., Wong E., Serhan C.N., Irimia D. Microfluidic chambers for monitoring leukocyte trafficking and humanized nano-proresolving medicines interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:20560-20565.
105. Bao X.R., Fraser I.D.C., Ea Wall, Quake S.R., Simon M.I. Variability in G-protein-coupled signaling studied with microfluidic devices. Biophys J 2010, 99:2414-2422.
106. Faley S.L., Copland M., Wlodkowic D., Kolch W., Seale K.T., Wikswo J.P., et al. Microfluidic single cell arrays to interrogate signalling dynamics of individual, patient-derived hematopoietic stem cells. Lab Chip 2009, 9:2659-2664.
107. Han Q., Bagheri N., Bradshaw E.M., Hafler Da, Lauffenburger Da, Love J.C. Polyfunctional responses by human T cells result from sequential release of cytokines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:1607-1612.
108. Shin Y.S., Remacle F., Fan R., Hwang K., Wei W., Ahmad H., et al. Protein signaling networks from single cell fluctuations and information theory profiling. Biophys J 2011, 100:2378-2386.
109. Ma C., Fan R., Ahmad H., Shi Q., Comin-Anduix B., Chodon T., et al. Aclinical microchip for evaluation of single immune cells reveals high functional heterogeneity in phenotypically similar T cells. Nat Med 2011, 17:738-743.
110. Di Carlo D., Wu L.Y., Lee L.P. Dynamic single cell culture array. Lab Chip 2006, 6:1445-1449.
111. Melin J., Quake S.R. Microfluidic large-scale integration: the evolution of design rules for biological automation. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2007, 36:213-231.
112. Weibel D.B., Whitesides G.M. Applications of microfluidics in chemical biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2006, 10:584-591.
113. Chattopadhyay P.K., Gierahn T.M., Roederer M., Love J.C. Single-cell technologies for monitoring immune systems. Nat Immunol 2014, 15:128-135.
114. Junkin M., Tay S. Microfluidic single-cell analysis for systems immunology. Lab Chip 2014, 14:1246-1260.
115. Doh J., Kim M., Krummel M.F. Cell-laden microwells for the study of multicellularity in lymphocyte fate decisions. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3422-3428.
116. Zaretsky I., Polonsky M., Shifrut E., Reich-Zeliger S., Antebi Y., Aidelberg G., et al. Monitoring the dynamics of primary T cell activation and differentiation using long term live cell imaging in microwell arrays. Lab Chip 2012, 12:5007-5015.
117. Duffy K.R., Wellard C.J., Markham J.F., Zhou J.H.S., Holmberg R., Hawkins E.D., et al. Activation-induced B cell fates are selected by intracellular stochastic competition. Science (New York, NY) 2012, 335:338-341.
118. + T cell functions reveals discordance for cytokine secretion and cytolysis. JClin Invest 2011, 121:4322-4331.
119. Hawkins E.D., Oliaro J., Kallies A., Belz G.T., Filby A., Hogan T., et al. Regulation of asymmetric cell division and polarity by scribble is not required for humoral immunity. Nat Commun 2013, 4:1801.
120. Day D., Pham K., Ludford-Menting M.J., Oliaro J., Izon D., Russell S.M., et al. Amethod for prolonged imaging of motile lymphocytes. Immunol Cell Biol 2009, 87:154-158.
121. Zurgil N., Afrimzon E., Deutsch A., Namer Y., Shafran Y., Sobolev M., et al. Polymer live-cell array for real-time kinetic imaging of immune cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5022-5029.
122. Rettig J.R., Folch A. Large-scale single-cell trapping and imaging using microwell arrays. Anal Chem 2005, 77:5628-5634.
123. Cai L., Friedman N., Xie X.S. Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 2006, 440:358-362.
124. Rottmar M., Håkanson M., Smith M., Maniura-Weber K. Stem cell plasticity, osteogenic differentiation and the third dimension. JMater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21:999-1004.
125. Torres A.J., Contento R.L., Gordo S., Wucherpfennig K.W., Love J.C. Functional single-cell analysis of T-cell activation by supported lipid bilayer-tethered ligands on arrays of nanowells. Lab Chip 2013, 13:90-99.
126. Polonsky M., Zaretsky I., Friedman N. Dynamic single-cell measurements of gene expression in primary lymphocytes: challenges, tools and prospects. Brief Funct Genomics 2013, 12(2):99-108.
127. Wan Y.Y., Flavell R.A. Identifying Foxp3-expressing suppressor T cells with a bicistronic reporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:5126-5131.
128. Eberl G., Marmon S., Sunshine M.J., Rennert P.D., Choi Y., Littman D.R. An essential function for the nuclear receptor RORgamma(t) in the generation of fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells. Nat Immunol 2004, 5:64-73.
129. Dimov I.K., Lu R., Lee E.P., Seita J., Sahoo D., Park S.-m., et al. Discriminating cellular heterogeneity using microwell-based RNA cytometry. Nat Commun 2014, 5:3451.
130. Guldevall K., Vanherberghen B., Frisk T., Hurtig J., Christakou A.E., Manneberg O., et al. Imaging immune surveillance of individual natural killer cells confined in microwell arrays. PloS one 2010, 5:e15453.
131. Yamanaka Y.J., Berger C.T., Sips M., Cheney P.C., Alter G., Love J.C. Single-cell analysis of the dynamics and functional outcomes of interactions between human natural killer cells and target cells. Integr Biol: Quantitative Biosciences from Nano to Macro 2012, 4:1175-1184.
132. Mitchell R.N. Learning from rejection: what transplantation teaches us about (other) vascular pathologies. JAutoimmun 2013, 45:80-89.
133. Invernizzi P. Liver autoi-immunology: the paradox of autoimmunity in a tolerogenic organ. JAutoimmun 2013, 46:1-6.
134. Gershwin M.E., Shoenfeld Y. Abul Abbas: an epitope of scholarship. JAutoimmun 2013, 45:1-6.