Recombination and Replication

Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1-14

  Syeda, Aisha H ^a   Hawkins, Michelle ^a   McGlynn, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA REPLICATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

DNA; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MODELS, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84905446435     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19430264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016550     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Aguilera A, Gomez-Gonzalez B. 2008. Genome instability: A mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet 9: 204-217.
2. Ahn JS, Osman F, Whitby MC. 2005. Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J 24: 2011-2023.
3. Amado L, Kuzminov A. 2006. The replication intermediates in Escherichia coli are not the product of DNA processing or uracil excision. J Biol Chem 281: 22635-22646.
4. Antony E, Tomko EJ, Xiao Q, Krejci L, Lohman TM, Ellenberger T. 2009. Srs2 disassembles Rad51 filaments by a protein-protein interaction triggering ATP turnover and dissociation of Rad51 from DNA. Mol Cell 35: 105-115.
5. Atkinson J, McGlynn P. 2009. Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 3475-3492.
6. Bakhlanova IV, Dudkina AV, Baitin DM, Knight KL, Cox MM, Lanzov VA. 2010. Modulating cellular recombination potential through alterations in RecA structure and regulation. Mol Microbiol 78: 1523-1538.
7. Betous R, Mason AC, Rambo RP, Bansbach CE, Badu-Nkansah A, Sirbu BM, Eichman BF, Cortez D. 2012. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability duringDNA replication. Genes Dev 26: 151-162.
8. Bierne H, Ehrlich SD, Michel B. 1991. The replication termination signal terB of the Escherichia coli chromosome is a deletion hot spot. EMBO J 10: 2699-2705.
9. Bizard AH, Hickson ID. 2014. The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016477.
10. Blastyak A, Pinter L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S, Haracska L. 2007. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell 28: 167-175.
11. Blow JJ, Ge XQ, Jackson DA. 2011. How dormant origins promote complete genome replication. Trends Biochem Sci 36: 405-414.
12. Bryant HE, Petermann E, Schultz N, Jemth AS, Loseva O, Issaeva N, Johansson F, Fernandez S, McGlynn P, Helleday T. 2009. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. EMBO J 28: 2601-2615.
13. Cadman CJ, Lopper M, Moon PB, Keck JL, McGlynn P. 2005. PriB stimulates PriA helicase via an interaction with single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem 280: 39693-39700.
14. Capaldo FN, Ramsey G, Barbour SD. 1974. Analysis of the growth of recombination-deficient strains of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 118: 242-249.
15. Chan KL, Palmai-Pallag T, Ying S, Hickson ID. 2009. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 11: 753-760.
16. Courcelle J, Hanawalt PC. 2003. RecA-dependent recovery of arrested DNA replication forks. Annu Rev Genet 37: 611-646.
17. Courcelle J, Carswell-Crumpton C, Hanawalt PC. 1997. recF and recR are required for the resumption of replication at DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 3714-3719.
18. Courcelle J, Donaldson JR, Chow KH, Courcelle CT. 2003. DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science 299: 1064-1067.
19. Courcelle CT, Belle JJ, Courcelle J. 2005.Nucleotide excision repair or polymerase V-mediated lesion bypass can act to restore UV-arrested replication forks in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187: 6953-6961.
20. Courcelle CT, Chow KH, Casey A, Courcelle J. 2006.Nascent DNA processing by RecJ favors lesion repair over translesion synthesis at arrested replication forks in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103: 9154-9159.
21. Cox MM. 2007a. Regulation of bacterial RecA protein function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 42: 41-63.
22. Cox MM. 2007b. Motoring along with the bacterial RecA protein. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 127-138.
23. Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuzer KN, Sherratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ. 2000. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404: 37-41.
24. Davies MJ. 2005. The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1703: 93-109.
25. Duch A, Felipe-Abrio I, Barroso S, Yaakov G, Garcia-Rubio M, Aguilera A, de Nadal E, Posas F. 2012. Coordinated control of replication and transcription by a SAPK protects genomic integrity. Nature 493: 116-119.
26. Edenberg HJ. 1976. Inhibition of DNA replication by ultraviolet light. Biophys J 16: 849-860.
27. Elvers I, Johansson F, Groth P, Erixon K, Helleday T. 2011. UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 7049-7057.
28. Fachinetti D, Bermejo R, Cocito A, Minardi S, Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Shirahige K, Azvolinsky A, Zakian VA, Foiani M. 2010. Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements. Mol Cell 39: 595-605.
29. Flores MJ, Bierne H, Ehrlich SD, Michel B. 2001. Impairment of lagging strand synthesis triggers the formation of a RuvABC substrate at replication forks. EMBO J 20: 619-629.
30. Fricke WM, Brill SJ. 2003. Slx1-Slx4 is a second structurespecific endonuclease functionally redundant with Sgs1-Top3. Genes Dev 17: 1768-1778.
31. Fujiwara Y, Tatsumi M. 1976. Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: Caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. Mutat Res 37: 91-110.
32. Gottesman MM, Hicks ML, Gellert M. 1973. Genetics and function of DNA ligase in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 77: 531-547.
33. Gruber M, Wellinger RE, Sogo JM. 2000. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 30 end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol Cell Biol 20: 5777-5787.
34. Gupta MK, Guy CP, Yeeles JT, Atkinson J, Bell H, Lloyd RG, Marians KJ, McGlynn P. 2013. Protein-DNA complexes are the primary sources of replication fork pausing in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: 7252-7257.
35. Guy CP, Atkinson J, Gupta MK, Mahdi AA, Gwynn EJ, Rudolph CJ, Moon PB, van Knippenberg IC, Cadman CJ, Dillingham MS, et al. 2009. Rep provides a second motor at the replisome to promote duplication of protein-bound DNA. Mol Cell 36: 654-666.
36. Hanada K, Budzowska M, Modesti M, Maas A, Wyman C, Essers J, Kanaar R. 2006. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81-Eme1 promotes conversion of interstrand DNA crosslinks into double-strands breaks. EMBO J 25: 4921-4932.
37. Hanada K, Budzowska M, Davies SL, van Drunen E, Onizawa H, Beverloo HB, Maas A, Essers J, Hickson ID, Kanaar R. 2007. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14: 1096-1104.
38. Hanawalt PC. 1966. The U.V. sensitivity of bacteria: Its relation to the DNA replication cycle. Photochem Photobiol 5: 1-12.
39. Hashimoto Y, Ray Chaudhuri A, Lopes M, Costanzo V. 2010. Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 1305-1311.
40. Hashimoto Y, Puddu F, Costanzo V. 2012. RAD51-and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 17-24.
41. Heller RC, Marians KJ. 2005a. Unwinding of the nascent lagging strand by Rep and PriA enables the direct restart of stalled replication forks. J Biol Chem 280: 34143-34151.
42. Heller RC, Marians KJ. 2005b. The disposition of nascent strands at stalled replication forks dictates the pathway of replisome loading during restart. Mol Cell 17: 733-743.
43. Heller RC, Marians KJ. 2006a. Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat RevMol Cell Biol 7: 932-943.
44. Heller RC, Marians KJ. 2006b. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature 439: 557-562.
45. Hiasa H, Marians KJ. 1994. Tus prevents overreplication of oriC plasmid DNA. J Biol Chem 269: 26959-26968.
46. Higgins NP, Kato K, Strauss B. 1976. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 101: 417-425.
47. Hill TM, Marians KJ. 1990. Escherichia coli Tus protein acts to arrest the progression ofDNA replication forks in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87: 2481-2485.
48. Hishida T, Kubota Y, Carr AM, Iwasaki H. 2009. RAD6-RAD18-RAD5-pathway-dependent tolerance to chronic low-dose ultraviolet light. Nature 457: 612-615.
49. Horiuchi T, Fujimura Y, Nishitani H, Kobayashi T, Hidaka M. 1994. The DNA replication fork blocked at the Ter site may be an entrance for the RecBCD enzyme into duplex DNA. J Bacteriol 176: 4656-4663.
50. Hotchkiss RD. 1974. Models of genetic recombination. Annu Rev Microbiol 28: 445-468.
51. Indiani C, Patel M, Goodman MF, O’Donnell ME. 2013. RecA acts as a switch to regulate polymerase occupancy in a moving replication fork. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110: 5410-5415.
52. Kadyrov FA, Drake JW. 2004. UvsX recombinase and Dda helicase rescue stalled bacteriophage T4 DNA replication forks in vitro. J Biol Chem 279: 35735-35740.
53. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, Ashikari T, Sugimoto K, Shirahige K. 2003. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083.
54. Kogoma T. 1997. Stable DNA replication: Interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 212-238.
55. Kouzminova EA, Kuzminov A. 2008. Patterns of chromosomal fragmentation due to uracil-DNA incorporation reveal a novel mechanism of replication-dependent double-stranded breaks. Mol Microbiol 68: 202-215.
56. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, Klein H, Ellenberger T, Sung P. 2003. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423: 305-309.
57. Krejci L, Altmannova V, Spirek M, Zhao X. 2012. Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 5795-5818.
58. Kreuzer KN, Brister JR. 2010. Initiation of bacteriophage T4 DNA replication and replication fork dynamics: A review in the Virology Journal series on bacteriophage T4 and its relatives. Virol J 7: 358.
59. Kuzminov A. 2001. Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 8241-8246.
60. Lambert S, Watson A, Sheedy DM, Martin B, Carr AM. 2005. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121: 689-702.
61. Lee EH, Kornberg A. 1991. Replication deficiencies in priA mutants of Escherichia coli lacking the primosomal replication n0 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88: 3029-3032.
62. Lehmann AR. 1972. Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 66: 319-337.
63. Letessier A, Millot GA, Koundrioukoff S, Lachages AM, Vogt N, Hansen RS, Malfoy B, Brison O, Debatisse M. 2011. Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site. Nature 470: 120-123.
64. Liu J, Morrical SW. 2010. Assembly and dynamics of the bacteriophage T4 homologous recombination machinery. Virol J 7: 357.
65. Liu J, Xu L, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ. 1999. Replication fork assembly at recombination intermediates is required for bacterial growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 3552-3555.
66. Liu P, Erez A, Nagamani SC, Dhar SU, Kolodziejska KE, Dharmadhikari AV, Cooper ML, Wiszniewska J, Zhang F, Withers MA, et al. 2011. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell 146: 889-903.
67. Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS. 2008. Break-induced replication:What is it and what is it for? CellCycle 7: 859-864.
68. Long DT, Kreuzer KN. 2008. Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105: 6852-6857.
69. Long JE, Renzette N, Sandler SJ. 2009. Suppression of constitutive SOS expression by recA4162 (I298 V) and recA4164 (L126 V) requires UvrD and RecX in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol 73: 226-239.
70. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, Newlon CS, Foiani M. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557-561.
71. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM. 2006. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 21: 15-27.
72. Lopper M, Boonsombat R, Sandler SJ, Keck JL. 2007. A hand-off mechanism for primosome assembly in replication restart. Mol Cell 26: 781-793.
73. Louarn JM, Louarn J, Francois V, Patte J. 1991. Analysis and possible role of hyperrecombination in the termination region of the Escherichia coli chromosome. J Bacteriol 173: 5097-5104.
74. Luder A, Mosig G. 1982. Two alternative mechanisms for initiation of DNA replication forks in bacteriophage T4: Priming by RNA polymerase and by recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79: 1101-1105.
75. Machwe A, Xiao L, Groden J, Orren DK. 2006. The Werner and Bloom syndrome proteins catalyze regression of a model replication fork. Biochemistry 45: 13939-13946.
76. Manosas M, Perumal SK, Croquette V, Benkovic SJ. 2012. Direct observation of stalled fork restart via fork regression in the T4 replication system. Science 338: 1217-1220.
77. Marians KJ, Hiasa H, Kim DR, McHenry CS. 1998. Role of the core DNA polymerase III subunits at the replication fork: a is the only subunit required for processive replication. J Biol Chem 273: 2452-2457.
78. Matos J, Blanco MG, Maslen S, Skehel JM, West SC. 2011. Regulatory control of the resolution of DNA recombination intermediates during meiosis and mitosis. Cell 147: 158-172.
79. McGlynn P. 2013. Helicases at the replication fork. Adv Exp Med Biol 767: 97-121.
80. McGlynn P, Guy CP. 2008. Replication forks blocked by protein-DNA complexes have limited stability in vitro. J Mol Biol 381: 249-255.
81. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG. 2000. Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression. Cell 101: 35-45.
82. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG. 2001. Action of RuvAB at replication fork structures. J Biol Chem 276: 41938-41944.
83. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG. 2002. Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 859-870.
84. McGlynn P, Al-Deib AA, Liu J, Marians KJ, Lloyd RG. 1997. The DNA replication protein PriA and the recombination protein RecG bind D-loops. J Mol Biol 270: 212-221.
85. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG, Marians KJ. 2001. Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 8235-8240.
86. McGlynn P, Savery NJ, Dillingham MS. 2012. The conflict between DNA replication and transcription. Mol Microbiol 85: 12-20.
87. McInerney P, O’Donnell M. 2007. Replisome fate upon encountering a leading strand block and clearance from DNA by recombination proteins. J Biol Chem 282: 25903-25916.
88. Mehta A, Haber JE. 2014. Sources of DNA doublestrand breaks and models for recombinational DNA repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016428.
89. Michel B, Grompone G, Flores MJ, Bidnenko V. 2004. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 12783-12788.
90. Mizuno K, Miyabe I, Schalbetter SA, Carr AM, Murray JM. 2012. Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats. Nature 493: 246-249.
91. Moore T, McGlynn P, Ngo HP, Sharples GJ, Lloyd RG. 2003. The RdgC protein of Escherichia coli binds DNA and counters a toxic effect of RecFOR in strains lacking the replication restart protein PriA. EMBO J 22: 735-745.
92. Moriel-Carretero M, Aguilera A. 2010. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51-or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms. Mol Cell 37: 690-701.
93. Morimatsu K, Kowalczykowski SC. 2003. RecFOR proteins load RecA protein onto gapped DNA to accelerate DNA strand exchange: A universal step of recombinational repair. Mol Cell 11: 1337-1347.
94. Mueser TC, Jones CE, Nossal NG, Hyde CC. 2000. Bacteriophage T4 gene 59 helicase assembly protein binds replication forkDNA. The 1.45Å resolution crystal structure reveals a novel a-helical two-domain fold. JMol Biol 296: 597-612.
95. Murray JM, Carr AM. 2008. Smc5/6: A link between DNA repair and unidirectional replication? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 177-182.
96. Nurse P, Zavitz KH, Marians KJ. 1991. Inactivation of the Escherichia coli priA DNA replication protein induces the SOS response. J Bacteriol 173: 6686-6693.
97. Osman F, Whitby MC. 2007. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 1004-1017.
98. Ozeri-Galai E, Lebofsky R, Rahat A, Bester AC, Bensimon A, KeremB. 2011. Failure of origin activation in response to fork stalling leads to chromosomal instability at fragile sites. Mol Cell 43: 122-131.
99. Pagès V, Fuchs RP. 2003. Uncoupling of leading-and lagging-strand DNA replication during lesion bypass in vivo. Science 300: 1300-1303.
100. Payne BT, van Knippenberg IC, Bell H, Filipe SR, Sherratt DJ, McGlynn P. 2006. Replication fork blockage by transcription factor-DNA complexes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 5194-5202.
101. Petermann E, Helleday T. 2010. Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 683-687.
102. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T. 2010. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37: 492-502.
103. Pohlhaus JR, Kreuzer KN. 2006. Formation and processing of stalled replication forks—Utility of two-dimensional agarose gels. Methods Enzymol 409: 477-493.
104. Pomerantz RT, O’Donnell M. 2010. Direct restart of a replication fork stalled by a head-on RNA polymerase. Science 327: 590-592.
105. Pommier Y. 2013. Drugging topoisomerases: Lessons and challenges. ACS Chem Biol 8: 82-95.
106. Pommier Y, Pourquier P, Fan Y, Strumberg D. 1998. Mechanism of action of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I and drugs targeted to the enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1400: 83-105.
107. Postow L, Ullsperger C, Keller RW, Bustamante C, Vologodskii AV, Cozzarelli NR. 2001. Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J Biol Chem 276: 2790-2796.
108. Ralf C, Hickson ID, Wu L. 2006. The Bloom’s syndrome helicase can promote the regression of a model replication fork. J Biol Chem 281: 22839-22846.
109. Raschle M, Knipsheer P, Enoiu M, Angelov T, Sun J, Griffith JD, Ellenberger T., Scharer OD, Walter JC. 2008. Mechanism of replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell 134: 969-980.
110. Rass U. 2013. Resolving branched DNA intermediates with structure-specific nucleases during replication in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 122: 499-515.
111. Robu ME, Inman RB, Cox MM. 2001. RecA protein promotes the regression of stalled replication forks in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 8211-8218.
112. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Lloyd RG. 2007. Replication fork stalling and cell cycle arrest in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. Genes Dev 21: 668-681.
113. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Lloyd RG. 2008. Maintaining replication fork integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 1589-1602.
114. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Harris L, Lloyd RG. 2009a. Pathological replication in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase. Mol Microbiol 73: 352-366.
115. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Lloyd RG. 2009b. Replication fork collisions cause pathological chromosomal amplification in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase. Mol Microbiol 74: 940-955.
116. Rudolph CJ, Mahdi AA, Upton AL, Lloyd RG. 2010. RecG protein and single-strand DNA exonucleases avoid cell lethality associated with PriA helicase activity in Escherichia coli. Genetics 186: 473-492.
117. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Stockum A, Nieduszynski CA, Lloyd RG. 2013. Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature 500: 608-611.
118. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P. 1968. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 31: 291-304.
119. Rupp WD, Wilde CE III, Reno DL, Howard-Flanders P. 1971. Exchanges between DNA strands in ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 61: 25-44.
120. Sandler SJ. 2000. Multiple genetic pathways for restarting DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12. Genetics 155: 487-497.
121. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. 2008.Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257.
122. Schlacher K, Cox MM, Woodgate R, Goodman MF. 2006. RecA acts in trans to allow replication of damaged DNA by DNA polymerase V. Nature 442: 883-887.
123. Schlacher K, Christ N, Siaud N, Egashira A, Wu H, Jasin M. 2011. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 145: 529-542.
124. Schwartz EK, Heyer WD. 2011. Processing of joint molecule intermediates by structure-selective endonucleases during homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Chromosoma 120: 109-127.
125. Seigneur M, Bidnenko V, Ehrlich SD, Michel B. 1998.RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell 95: 419-430.
126. Seigneur M, Ehrlich SD, Michel B. 2000. RuvABC-dependent double-strand breaks in dnaBts mutants require recA. Mol Microbiol 38: 565-574.
127. Setlow RB, Swenson PA, Carrier WL. 1963. Thymine dimers and inhibition of DNA synthesis by ultraviolet irradiation of cells. Science 142: 1464-1466.
128. Skalka A. 1974. A replicator’s view of recombination (and repair). In Mechanisms in recombination (ed. Grell RF), pp. 421-432. Plenum, New York
129. Smith KC. 2004. Recombinational DNA repair: The ignored repair systems. Bioessays 26: 1322-1326.
130. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M. 2002. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602.
131. St Charles J, Petes TD. 2013. High-resolution mapping of spontaneous mitotic recombination hotspots on the 1.1 Mb arm of yeast chromosome IV. PLoS Genet 9: e1003434.
132. Svoboda DL, Vos JM. 1995. Differential replication of a single, UV-induced lesion in the leading or lagging strand by a human cell extract: Fork uncoupling or gap formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92: 11975-11979.
133. Symington LS, Gautier J. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45: 247-271.
134. Szyjka SJ, Viggiani CJ, Aparicio OM. 2005. Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 19: 691-697.
135. Tercero JA, Diffley JF. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557.
136. Tittel-Elmer M, Alabert C, Pasero P, Cobb JA. 2009. The MRX complex stabilizes the replisome independently of the S phase checkpoint during replication stress. EMBO J 28: 1142-1156.
137. Trautinger BW, Jaktaji RP, Rusakova E, Lloyd RG. 2005.RNA polymerase modulators andDNA repair activities resolve conflicts between DNA replication and transcription. Mol Cell 19: 247-258.
138. Vaisica JA, Baryshnikova A, Costanzo M, Boone C, Brown GW. 2011. Mms1 and Mms22 stabilize the replisome during replication stress. Mol Biol Cell 22: 2396-2408.
139. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F. 2003. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423: 309-312.
140. Veaute X, Delmas S, Selva M, Jeusset J, Le Cam E, Matic I, Fabre F, Petit MA. 2005. UvrD helicase, unlike Rep helicase, dismantles RecA nucleoprotein filaments in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 24: 180-189.
141. Webb MR, Plank JL, Long DT, Hsieh TS, Kreuzer KN. 2007. The phage T4 protein UvsW drives Holliday junction branch migration. J Biol Chem 282: 34401-34411.
142. Xu L, Marians KJ. 2003. PriA mediates DNA replication pathway choice at recombination intermediates. Mol Cell 11: 817-826.
143. Yeeles JT, Marians KJ. 2011. The Escherichia coli replisome is inherently DNA damage tolerant. Science 334: 235-238.
144. Yeeles JT, Marians KJ. 2013. Dynamics of leading-strand lesion skipping by the replisome. Mol Cell 52: 855-865.
145. Yoon D, Wang Y, Stapleford K, Wiesmuller L, Chen J. 2004. p53 inhibits strand exchange and replication fork regression promoted by human Rad51. J Mol Biol 336: 639-654.