Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile site

Nature

Volumn 470, Issue 7332, 2011, Pages 120-124

  Letessier, Anne ^a,b,c   Millot, Gaël A ^a,b,c   Koundrioukoff, Stéphane ^a,b,c   Lachagès, Anne Marie ^a,b,c   Vogt, Nicolas ^a,b,c   Hansen, R Scott ^d   Malfoy, Bernard ^a,b,c   Brison, Olivier ^a,b,c   Debatisse, Michelle ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Institut Curie   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; CANCER; CHROMOSOME; CYTOGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; MAPPING; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PUBLIC HEALTH; TUMOR;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CELL TYPE; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA REPLICATION TIMING; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FIBROBLAST; FRA3B GENE; GENE; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPLICATION; HUMAN; LYMPHOBLASTOID CELL; LYMPHOCYTE; MAMMAL CELL; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

ACID ANHYDRIDE HYDROLASES; CELL LINE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES; CHROMOSOME FRAGILITY; DNA REPLICATION; FIBROBLASTS; GENES, TUMOR SUPPRESSOR; GENETIC LOCI; HUMANS; LYMPHOCYTES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; REPLICATION ORIGIN;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 79551661935     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09745     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Sutherland, G. R. & Richards, R. I. The molecular basis of fragile sites in human chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 323-327 (1995).
2. Negrini, S., Gorgoulis, V. G. & Halazonetis, T. D. Genomic instability-an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 220-228 (2010).
3. Bignell, G. R. et al. Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome. Nature 463, 893-898 (2010).
4. Schwartz, M., Zlotorynski, E. & Kerem, B.The molecular basis ofcommon and rare fragile sites. Cancer Lett. 232, 13-26 (2006).
5. Grégoire, D., Brodolin, K. & Méchali, M. HoxB domain induction silences DNA replication origins in the locus and specifies a single origin at its boundary. EMBO Rep. 7, 812-816 (2006).
6. Dazy, S., Gandrillon, O., Hyrien, O. & Prioleau, M. N. Broadening of DNA replication origin usage during metazoan cell differentiation. EMBO Rep. 7, 806-811 (2006).
7. Hansen, R. S. et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 139-144 (2010).
8. Hiratani, I. et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 6, E245 (2008).
9. Tourriere, H. & Pasero, P. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair 6, 900-913 (2007).
10. Branzei, D.& Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability atthe replication fork. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208-219, 2010.
11. Durkin, S. G. & Glover, T. W. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 169-192 (2007).
12. Helmrich, A., Stout-Weider, K., Hermann, K., Schrock, E. & Heiden, T. Common fragile sites are conserved featuresofhuman andmousechromosomesandrelate to large active genes. Genome Res. 16, 1222-1230 (2006).
13. Tsantoulis, P. K. et al. Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study. Oncogene 27, 3256-3264 (2008).
14. Palumbo, E., Matricardi, L., Tosoni, E., Bensimon, A. & Russo, A. Replication dynamics at common fragile site FRA6E. Chromosoma, (2010).
15. Huebner, K. & Croce, C. M.Cancer and the FRA3B/FHIT fragile locus: it'sa HIT. Br. J. Cancer 88, 1501-1506 (2003).
16. Pichiorri, F. et al. Molecular parameters of genome instability: rolesof fragile genes at common fragile sites. J. Cell. Biochem. 104, 1525-1533 (2008).
17. Lebofsky, R., Heilig, R., Sonnleitner, M., Weissenbach, J. & Bensimon, A. DNA replication origin interference increases the spacing between initiation events in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 5337-5345 (2006).
18. Cha, R. S. & Kleckner, N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, Thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297, 602-606 (2002).
19. Rothstein, R., Michel, B. & Gangloff, S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev. 14, 1-10 (2000).
20. Farkash-Amar, S. et al. Global organization of replication time zones of the mouse genome. Genome Res. 18, 1562-1570 (2008).
21. Anglana, M., Apiou, F., Bensimon, A. & Debatisse, M. Dynamics of DNA replicationin mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 114, 385-394 (2003).
22. Courbet, S. et al. Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells. Nature 455, 557-560 (2008).
23. Bielinsky, A. K. Replication origins: why do we need so many? Cell Cycle 2, 307-309 (2003).
24. El Achkar, E., Gerbault-Seureau, M., Muleris, M., Dutrillaux, B. & Debatisse, M. Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18069-18074 (2005).
25. Le Beau, M. M. et al. Replication of a common fragile site, FRA3B, Occurs late in S phase and is delayed further upon induction: implications for the mechanism of fragile site induction. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 755-761 (1998).
26. Durkin, S. G. et al. Replication stress induces tumor-like microdeletions in FHIT/ FRA3B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 246-251 (2008).
27. Ryba, T. et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 20, 761-770 (2010).
28. O'Keefe, L. V. & Richards, R. I. Common chromosomal fragile sites and cancer: focus on FRA16D. Cancer Lett. 232, 37-47 (2006).
29. Masai, H., Matsumoto, S., You, Z., Yoshizawa-Sugata, N. & Oda, M. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, When, And how? Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 89-130 (2010).
30. Michalet, X. et al. Dynamic molecular combing: stretching the whole human genome for high-resolution studies. Science 277, 1518-1523 (1997).
31. Labit, H. et al. A simple and optimized method of producing silanized surfaces for FISHandreplication mappingoncombed DNAfibers.Biotechniques45, 649-658 (2008).
32. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2006).