Productive Replication of human papillomavirus 31 requires DNA repair factor Nbs1

Journal of Virology

Volumn 88, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 8528-8544

  Anacker, Daniel C ^a   Gautam, Dipendra ^a   Gillespie, Kenric A ^a   Chappell, William H ^a   Moody, Cary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATR PROTEIN; MRE11 PROTEIN; NIBRIN; PROTEIN E7; RAD50 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; VIRUS DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHK2 GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SILENCING; GENE TARGETING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 31; NBS1 GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; VIRUS GENE; VIRUS REPLICATION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS 31; HUMANS; KERATINOCYTES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PAPILLOMAVIRUS E7 PROTEINS; VIRUS REPLICATION;

EID: 84903904632     PISSN: 0022538X     EISSN: 10985514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00517-14     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Longworth MS, Laimins LA. 2004. Pathogenesis of human papillomaviruses in differentiating epithelia. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68:362-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.68.2.362-372.2004.
2. Zur Hausen H. 2009. Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers-a brief historical account. Virology 384:260-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.046.
3. Kadaja M, Silla T, Ustav E, Ustav M. 2009. Papillomavirus DNA replication-from initiation to genomic instability. Virology 384:360-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.032.
4. Hoffmann R, Hirt B, Bechtold V, Beard P, Raj K. 2006. Different modes of human papillomavirus DNA replication during maintenance. J. Virol. 80:4431-4439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.9.4431-4439.2006.
5. Fradet-Turcotte A, Moody C, Laimins LA, Archambault J. 2010. Nuclear export of human papillomavirus type 31 E1 is regulated by Cdk2 phosphorylation and required for viral genome maintenance. J. Virol. 84:11747-11760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01445-10.
6. Banerjee NS, Wang HK, Broker TR, Chow LT. 2011. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E7 induces prolonged G2 following S phase reentry in differentiated human keratinocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 286:15473-15482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.197574.
7. Wang HK, Duffy AA, Broker TR, Chow LT. 2009. Robust production and passaging of infectious HPV in squamous epithelium of primary human keratinocytes. Genes Dev. 23:181-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1735109.
8. Fradet-Turcotte A, Bergeron-Labrecque F, Moody CA, Lehoux M, Laimins LA, Archambault J. 2011. Nuclear accumulation of the papillomavirus E1 helicase blocks S-phase progression and triggers an ATMdependent DNA damage response. J. Virol. 85:8996-9012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00542-11.
9. Flores ER, Lambert PF. 1997. Evidence for a switch in the mode of human papillomavirus type 16DNAreplication during the viral life cycle. J. Virol. 71:7167-7179.
10. Munger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, Hayakawa H, Nguyen CL, Owens M, Grace M, Huh K. 2004. Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J. Virol. 78:11451-11460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.21.11451-11460.2004.
11. Weitzman MD, Lilley CE, Chaurushiya MS. 2010. Genomes in conflict: maintaining genome integrity during virus infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64:61-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134016.
12. Moody CA, Laimins LA. 2009. Human papillomaviruses activate the ATM DNA damage pathway for viral genome amplification upon differentiation. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000605.
13. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. 2010. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40:179-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019.
14. Bester AC, Roniger M, Oren YS, Im MM, Sarni D, Chaoat M, Bensimon A, Zamir G, Shewach DS, Kerem B. 2011. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145: 435-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.044.
15. Duensing S, Munger K. 2002. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins independently induce numerical and structural chromosome instability. Cancer Res. 62:7075-7082.
16. Hong S, Laimins LA. 2013. The JAK-STAT transcriptional regulator, STAT-5, activates the ATM DNA damage pathway to induce HPV 31 genome amplification upon epithelial differentiation. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003295.
17. Sakakibara N, Mitra R, McBride AA. 2011. The papillomavirus E1 helicase activates a cellular DNA damage response in viral replication foci. J. Virol. 85:8981-8995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00541-11.
18. Gillespie KA, Mehta KP, Laimins LA, Moody CA. 2012. Human papillomaviruses recruit cellular DNA repair and homologous recombination factors to viral replication centers. J. Virol. 86:9520-9526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00247-12.
19. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H. 2008. Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:229-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255.
20. Nuss JE, Patrick SM, Oakley GG, Alter GM, Robison JG, Dixon K, Turchi JJ. 2005. DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A. 1. Identification of novel sites of phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. Biochemistry 44:8428-8437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi0480584.
21. Zernik-Kobak M, Vasunia K, Connelly M, Anderson CW, Dixon K. 1997. Sites of UV-induced phosphorylation of the p34 subunit of replication protein A from HeLa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272:23896-23904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.38.23896.
22. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, Baer R, Lukas J, Jackson SP. 2007. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450:509-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06337.
23. Sakakibara N, Chen D, McBride AA. 2013. Papillomaviruses use recombination-dependent replication to vegetatively amplify their genomes in differentiated cells. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003321.
24. Moynahan ME, Jasin M. 2010. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:196-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2851.
25. Boichuk S, Hu L, Hein J, Gjoerup OV. 2010. Multiple DNA damage signaling and repair pathways deregulated by simian virus 40 large T antigen. J. Virol. 84:8007-8020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00334-10.
26. Schumacher AJ, Mohni KN, Kan Y, Hendrickson EA, Stark JM, Weller SK. 2012. The HSV-1 exonuclease, UL12, stimulates recombination by a single strand annealing mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002862.
27. Wilkinson DE, Weller SK. 2004. Recruitment of cellular recombination and repair proteins to sites of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA replication is dependent on the composition of viral proteins within prereplicative sites and correlates with the induction of the DNA damage response. J. Virol. 78:4783-4796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.9.4783-4796.2004.
28. Wilkinson DE, Weller SK. 2003. The role of DNA recombination in herpes simplex virus DNA replication. IUBMB Life 55:451-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15216540310001612237.
29. Kudoh A, Iwahori S, Sato Y, Nakayama S, Isomura H, Murata T, Tsurumi T. 2009. Homologous recombinational repair factors are recruited and loaded onto the viral DNA genome in Epstein-Barr virus replication compartments. J. Virol. 83:6641-6651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00049-09.
30. Dheekollu J, Deng Z, Wiedmer A, Weitzman MD, Lieberman PM. 2007. A role for MRE11, NBS1, and recombination junctions in replication and stable maintenance of EBV episomes. PLoS One 2:e1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001257.
31. Dheekollu J, Chen HS, Kaye KM, Lieberman PM. 2013. Timelessdependent DNA replication-coupled recombination promotes Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus episome maintenance and terminal repeat stability. J. Virol. 87:3699-3709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02211-12.
32. Williams RS, Williams JS, Tainer JA. 2007. Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. Biochem. Cell Biol. 85:509-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/O07-069.
33. Lavin MF. 2007. ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signalDNAdouble-strand breaks. Oncogene 26:7749-7758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210880.
34. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2007. Activation and regulation of ATM kinase activity in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Oncogene 26:7741-7748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210872.
35. Lee JH, Paull TT. 2005. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 308:551-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1108297.
36. Uziel T, Lerenthal Y, Moyal L, Andegeko Y, Mittelman L, Shiloh Y. 2003. Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage. EMBO J. 22:5612-5621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg541.
37. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, III, Hurov KE, Luo J, Bakalarski CE, Zhao Z, Solimini N, Lerenthal Y, Shiloh Y, Gygi SP, Elledge SJ. 2007. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316:1160-1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1140321.
38. Falck J, Coates J, Jackson SP. 2005. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature 434:605-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03442.
39. Lamarche BJ, Orazio NI, Weitzman MD. 2010. The MRN complex in double-strand break repair and telomere maintenance. FEBS Lett. 584: 3682-3695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.07.029.
40. Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, Davis EM, Le Beau M, Yates JR, III, Hays L, Morgan WF, Petrini JH. 1998. The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 93:477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81175-7.
41. Digweed M, Sperling K. 2004. Nijmegen breakage syndrome: clinical manifestation of defective response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3:1207-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.004.
42. Varon R, Vissinga C, Platzer M, Cerosaletti KM, Chrzanowska KH, Saar K, Beckmann G, Seemanova E, Cooper PR, Nowak NJ, Stumm M, Weemaes CM, Gatti RA, Wilson RK, Digweed M, Rosenthal A, Sperling K, Concannon P, Reis A. 1998. Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Cell 93:467-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81174-5.
43. Wu X, Avni D, Chiba T, Yan F, Zhao Q, Lin Y, Heng H, Livingston D. 2004. SV40 T antigen interacts with Nbs1 to disrupt DNA replication control. Genes Dev. 18:1305-1316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1182804.
44. Balasubramanian N, Bai P, Buchek G, Korza G, Weller SK. 2010. Physical interaction between the herpes simplex virus type 1 exonuclease, UL12, and the DNA double-strand break-sensing MRN complex. J. Virol. 84:12504-12514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01506-10.
45. Wilson R, Laimins LA. 2005. Differentiation of HPV-containing cells using organotypic "raft" culture or methylcellulose. Methods Mol. Med. 119:157-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-982-6:157.
46. Kraakman-van der Zwet M, Overkamp WJ, Friedl AA, Klein B, Verhaegh GW, Jaspers NG, Midro AT, Eckardt-Schupp F, Lohman PH, Zdzienicka MZ. 1999. Immortalization and characterization of Nijmegen breakage syndrome fibroblasts. Mutat. Res. 434:17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8777(99)00009-9.
47. Hebner CM, Wilson R, Rader J, Bidder M, Laimins LA. 2006. Human papillomaviruses target the double-stranded RNA protein kinase pathway. J. Gen. Virol. 87:3183-3193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.82098-0.
48. Hubert WG, Laimins LA. 2002. Human papillomavirus type 31 replica-tion modes during the early phases of the viral life cycle depend on transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of E1 and E2 expression. J. Virol. 76:2263-2273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jvi.76.5.2263-2273.2002.
49. Longworth MS, Laimins LA. 2004. The binding of histone deacetylases and the integrity of zinc finger-like motifs of the E7 protein are essential for the life cycle of human papillomavirus type 31. J. Virol. 78:3533-3541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.7.3533-3541.2004.
50. Bodily JM, Mehta KP, Laimins LA. 2011. Human papillomavirus E7 enhances hypoxia-inducible factor 1-mediated transcription by inhibiting binding of histone deacetylases. Cancer Res. 71:1187-1195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2626.
51. Cerosaletti KM, Desai-Mehta A, Yeo TC, Kraakman-Van Der Zwet M, Zdzienicka MZ, Concannon P. 2000. Retroviral expression of the NBS1 gene in cultured Nijmegen breakage syndrome cells restores normal radiation sensitivity and nuclear focus formation. Mutagenesis 15:281-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/15.3.281.
52. Desai-Mehta A, Cerosaletti KM, Concannon P. 2001. Distinct functional domains of nibrin mediate Mre11 binding, focus formation, and nuclear localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:2184-2191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.6.2184-2191.2001.
53. You Z, Chahwan C, Bailis J, Hunter T, Russell P. 2005. ATM activation and its recruitment to damagedDNArequire binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5363-5379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.13.5363-5379.2005.
54. Fehrmann F, Klumpp DJ, Laimins LA. 2003. Human papillomavirus type 31 E5 protein supports cell cycle progression and activates late viral functions upon epithelial differentiation. J. Virol. 77:2819-2831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.77.5.2819-2831.2003.
55. Mighty KK, Laimins LA. 2011. p63 is necessary for the activation of human papillomavirus late viral functions upon epithelial differentiation. J. Virol. 85:8863-8869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00750-11.
56. Schreiber E, Matthias P, Muller MM, Schaffner W. 1989. Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with 'mini-extracts', prepared from a small number of cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:6419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.15.6419.
57. Kadaja M, Isok-Paas H, Laos T, Ustav E, Ustav M. 2009 Mechanism of genomic instability in cells infected with the high-risk human papillomaviruses. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000397.
58. Stewart GS, Maser RS, Stankovic T, Bressan DA, Kaplan MI, Jaspers NG, Raams A, Byrd PJ, Petrini JH, Taylor AM. 1999. The DNA doublestrand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxiatelangiectasia-like disorder. Cell 99:577-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81547-0.
59. Takemura H, Rao VA, Sordet O, Furuta T, Miao ZH, Meng L, Zhang H, Pommier Y. 2006. Defective Mre11-dependent activation of Chk2 by ataxia telangiectasia mutated in colorectal carcinoma cells in response to replication-dependent DNA double strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 30814-30823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M603747200.
60. Maser RS, Zinkel R, Petrini JH. 2001. An alternative mode of translation permits production of a variant NBS1 protein from the common Nijmegen breakage syndrome allele. Nat. Genet. 27:417-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/86920.
61. Cerosaletti K, Wright J, Concannon P. 2006. Active role for nibrin in the kinetics of atm activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:1691-1699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.5.1691-1699.2006.
62. Stracker TH, Petrini JH. 2011. The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:90-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3047.
63. Duursma AM, Driscoll R, Elias JE, Cimprich KA. 2013. A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment. Mol. Cell 50: 116-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.03.006.
64. Shiotani B, Nguyen HD, Hakansson P, Marechal A, Tse A, Tahara H, Zou L. 2013. Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1. Cell Rep. 3:1651-1662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018.
65. Rodier F, Coppe JP, Patil CK, Hoeijmakers WA, Munoz DP, Raza SR, Freund A, Campeau E, Davalos AR, Campisi J. 2009. Persistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion. Nat. Cell Biol. 11:973-979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1909.
66. Moody CA, Fradet-Turcotte A, Archambault J, Laimins LA. 2007. Human papillomaviruses activate caspases upon epithelial differentiation to induce viral genome amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 19541-19546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707947104.
67. Tseng SF, Chang CY, Wu KJ, Teng SC. 2005. Importin KPNA2 is required for proper nuclear localization and multiple functions of NBS1. J. Biol. Chem. 280:39594-39600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M508425200.
68. Kim ST, Xu B, Kastan MB. 2002. Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 16:560-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.970602.
69. Kitagawa R, Bakkenist CJ, McKinnon PJ, Kastan MB. 2004. Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway. Genes Dev. 18:1423-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1200304.
70. Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. 2004. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:792-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1493.
71. Lim DS, Kim ST, Xu B, Maser RS, Lin J, Petrini JH, Kastan MB. 2000. ATMphosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35007091.
72. Iijima K, Muranaka C, Kobayashi J, Sakamoto S, Komatsu K, Matsuura S, Kubota N, Tauchi H. 2008. NBS1 regulates a novel apoptotic pathway through Bax activation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7:1705-1716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.06.013.
73. Cerosaletti KM, Concannon P. 2003. Nibrin forkhead-associated domain and breast cancer C-terminal domain are both required for nuclear focus formation and phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:21944-21951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211689200.
74. Zhao S, Renthal W, Lee EY. 2002. Functional analysis of FHA and BRCT domains of NBS1 in chromatin association and DNA damage responses. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:4815-4822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf612.
75. Chen L, Nievera CJ, Lee AY, Wu X. 2008. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 283:7713-7720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M710245200.
76. Yuan J, Chen J. 2009. N terminus of CtIP is critical for homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 31746-31752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.023424.
77. Wang H, Shi LZ, Wong CC, Han X, Hwang PY, Truong LN, Zhu Q, Shao Z, Chen DJ, Berns MW, Yates JR, III, Chen L, Wu X. 2013. The interaction of CtIP and Nbs1 connects CDK and ATM to regulate HRmediated double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003277.
78. Wu X, Ranganathan V, Weisman DS, Heine WF, Ciccone DN, O'Neill TB, Crick KE, Pierce KA, Lane WS, Rathbun G, Livingston DM, Weaver DT. 2000. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 405:477-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35013089.
79. Gatei M, Young D, Cerosaletti KM, Desai-Mehta A, Spring K, Kozlov S, Lavin MF, Gatti RA, Concannon P, Khanna K. 2000. ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Nat. Genet. 25:115-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75508.
80. Wohlbold L, Merrick KA, De S, Amat R, Kim JH, Larochelle S, Allen JJ, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Petrini JH, Fisher RP. 2012. Chemical genetics reveals a specific requirement for Cdk2 activity in the DNA damage response and identifies Nbs1 as a Cdk2 substrate in human cells. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002935.
81. Falck J, Forment JV, Coates J, Mistrik M, Lukas J, Bartek J, Jackson SP. 2012. CDK targeting of NBS1 promotes DNA-end resection, replication restart and homologous recombination. EMBO Rep. 13:561-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.58.
82. Yata K, Lloyd J, Maslen S, Bleuyard JY, Skehel M, Smerdon SJ, Esashi F. 2012. Plk1 and CK2 act in concert to regulate Rad51 during DNA double strand break repair. Mol. Cell 45:371-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.028.
83. Sakakibara N, Chen D, Jang MK, Kang DW, Luecke HF, Wu SY, Chiang CM, McBride AA. 2013. Brd4 is displaced from HPV replication factories as they expand and amplify viral DNA. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003777.
84. Petermann E, Helleday T. 2010. Pathways of mammalian replication fork restart. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:683-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2974.
85. Sowd GA, Li NY, Fanning E. 2013. ATM and ATR activities maintain replication fork integrity during SV40 chromatin replication. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003283.
86. Bruhn C, Zhou ZW, Ai H, Wang ZQ. 2014. The essential function of the MRN complex in the resolution of endogenous replication intermediates. Cell Rep. 6:182-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.018.
87. Kanu N, Behrens A. 2007. ATMIN defines an NBS1-independent pathway of ATM signalling. EMBOJ. 26:2933-2941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601733.
88. Zhang T, Penicud K, Bruhn C, Loizou JI, Kanu N, Wang ZQ, Behrens A. 2012. Competition between NBS1 and ATMIN controlsATMsignaling pathway choice. Cell Rep. 2:1498-1504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.002.
89. Mochan TA, Venere M, DiTullio RA, Jr, Halazonetis TD. 2003. 53BP1 and NFBD1/MDC1-Nbs1 function in parallel interacting pathways activating ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) in response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 63:8586-8591.
90. Lee JH, Goodarzi AA, Jeggo PA, Paull TT. 2010. 53BP1 promotes ATM activity through direct interactions with the MRN complex. EMBO J. 29: 574-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.372.
91. van der Linden E, Sanchez H, Kinoshita E, Kanaar R, Wyman C. 2009. RAD50 and NBS1 form a stable complex functional in DNA binding and tethering. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:1580-1588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1072.
92. Allison SJ, Jiang M, Milner J. 2009. Oncogenic viral protein HPV E7 up-regulates the SIRT1 longevity protein in human cervical cancer cells. Aging (Albany NY) 1:316-327.
93. Yuan Z, Zhang X, Sengupta N, Lane WS, Seto E. 2007. SIRT1 regulates the function of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein. Mol. Cell 27: 149-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.029.
94. Avvakumov N, Torchia J, Mymryk JS. 2003. Interaction of the HPV E7 proteins with the pCAF acetyltransferase. Oncogene 22:3833-3841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206562.
95. Nguyen CL, Munger K. 2008. Direct association of the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein with cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin E/CDK2 complexes. Virology 380: 21-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.07.017.
96. Moody CA, Laimins LA. 2010. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins: pathways to transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10:550-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc2886.
97. Roman A, Munger K. 2013. The papillomavirus E7 proteins. Virology 445:138-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.013.