The learner control principle in multimedia learning

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 487-512

  Scheiter, Katharina ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897933745     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.025     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Akbulut, Y., & Cardak, C. S. (2012). Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education,58, 835-842.
2. Alexander, P.A. (2013). Calibration: What is it and why it matters? An introduction to the special issue on calibrating calibration. Learning and Instruction,24, 1-3.
3. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes(pp. 199-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Amadieu, F., van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Marin é, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction,19, 376-386.
5. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist,40, 199-209.
6. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology,96, 523-535.
7. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology,29, 344-370.
8. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2006). Using computers as metacognitive tools to foster students’ self-regulated learning. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning Journal,3, 97-104.
9. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research,30, 87-111.
10. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science,33, 367-379.
11. Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Self-regulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with MetaCognitive tools. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Computers, cognition, and collaboration in education(pp. 225-247). Amsterdam: Springer.
12. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist,45, 210-223.
13. Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: theory and practice (rev. ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
14. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of rel ection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research,4, 359-375.
15. Bannert, M., & Reimann P. (2012). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science,40, 193-211.
16. Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition,18, 130-150.
17. Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research,28, 15-30.
18. Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior,22, 251-266.
19. Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction,11, 125-156.
20. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). e-Learning and the science of instruction (2d ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
21. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer,20, 17-41.
22. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merri ë nboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science,34, 399-422.
23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,4, 227-268.
24. de Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on exploratory behaviour and knowledge acquisition in hypertext environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18, 219-232.
25. DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1616-1641.
26. de Vries, E., & de Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science,3-4, 285-302.
27. Dias, P., Gomes, M. J., & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research,20, 93-117.
28. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research,68, 322-349.
29. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 569-588). New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Fitzgerald, G., Hardin, L., & Hollingsead, C. (1997). Engaging preservice teachers in hypermedia authoring: Process and outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research,1 6, 191-207.
31. Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,9, 281-312.
32. Gabbard, R. B. (2000). Constructivism, hypermedia, and the World Wide Web. CyberPsychology and Behavior,3, 103-110.
33. Gall, J. E., & Hannai n, M. J. (1994). A framework for the study of hypertext. Instructional Science,22, 207-232.
34. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal coni gurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist,38, 33-41.
35. Glover, J. A., Dinnel, D. L., Halpain, D. R., McKee, T. K., Corkill, A. J. Y., & Wise, S. L. (1988). Effects of across-chapter signals on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 3-15.
36. Hadwin, A. F., Winne, P. H., Stockley, D. B., Nesbit, J., & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 477-487.
37. Heath, S., Higgs, J., & Ambruso, D.R. (2008). Evidence of knowledge acquisition in a cognitive l exibility-based computer learning environment. Medical Education Online, 13. Retrieved May 19, 2013, from www.med-ed-online.org.
38. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79, 995-1006.
39. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,4, 321-364.
40. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive l exibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research,12, 301-333.
41. Johnson, A. M., Azevedo, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2011). The temporal and dynamic nature of self-regulatory processes during independent and externally assisted hypermedia. Cognition and Instruction,29, 471-504.
42. Kalyuga, S. (2006). Rapid cognitive assessment of learners’ knowledge structures. Learning and Instruction,16, 1-11.
43. Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review,19, 509-539.
44. Katz, I., & Assor, A. (2007). When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review,19, 429-442.
45. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tool designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research,30, 139-161.
46. Kennedy, G. (2004). Promoting cognition in multimedia interactivity research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research,15, 43-61.
47. Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behavior and Information Technology,14, 239-250.
48. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior,17, 125-140.
50. Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science,25, 117-131.
51. Lawless, K.A., Brown, S.W., Mills, R., & Mayall, H.J. (2003). Knowledge, interest, recall, and navigation: A look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research,35, 911-934.
52. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research,14, 385-399.
53. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,7, 51-69.
54. Lemari é, J., Lorch, R. F., Eyrolle, H., & Virbel, J. (2008). SARA: A text-based and reader-based theory of signaling. Educational Psychologist,43, 27-48.
55. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computerbased biology environment: Effects of promoting college students to rel ect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36, 837-858.
56. Lowrey, W., & Kim, K. S. (2009). Online news media and advanced learning: A test of cognitive l exibility theory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,53, 547-566.
57. Lunts, E. (2002). What does the literature say about the effectiveness of learner control in computer-assisted instruction? Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education,1, 59-75.
58. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research,59, 43-64.
59. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Mayes, T., Kibby, M., & Anderson, T. (1990). Learning about learning from hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 227-250). Berlin: Springer.
61. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics,27, 61-68.
62. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction,14, 1-43.
63. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 349-363.
64. Mills, R. J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal,19, 21-30.
65. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology33, 270-298.
66. Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior,26, 265-276.
67. Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,22, 149-158.
68. Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. L., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The inl uence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research,23, 237-255.
69. Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research,15, 157-174.
70. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., & Rohrer, D. R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,9, 105-119.
71. Patall, E.A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research i ndings. Psychological Bulletin,134, 270-300.
72. Patterson, N. G. (2000). Hypertext and the changing role of readers. English Journal, 90. Retrieved May 19, 2013, from www.jstor.org/stable/821221.
73. Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., Murray, T., & Bromme, R. (2012). Is adaptation to task complexity really benei cial for performance? Learning and Instruction,22, 281-289.
74. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,58, 327-345.
75. Reader, W. R., & Payne, S. J. (2007). Allocating time across multiple texts: Sampling and satisi cing. Human Computer Interaction,22, 263-298.
76. Rouet, J.-F. & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In: J.-F. Rouet, J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition(pp. 9-23) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77. Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (Eds.) (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes,40, 171-191.
79. Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review,19, 285-307.
80. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction,19, 387-401.
81. Scheiter, K., & van Gog, T. (2009). Using eye tracking in applied research to study and stimulate the processing of information from multi-representational sources. Applied Cognitive Psychology,23, 1209-1214.
82. Schnackenberg, H. L., Sullivan, H. J., Leader, L. F., & Jones, E. E. K. (1998). Learner preferences and achievement under differing amounts of learner practice. Educational Technology Research and Development,46, 5-16.
83. Schüler, A., Scheiter, K., & van Genuchten, E. (2011). The role of working memory in multimedia instruction: Is working memory working during learning from text and pictures? Educational Psychology Review,23, 389-411.
84. Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The inl uence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research,31, 77-93.
85. Scott, B. M., & Schwartz, N.H. (2007). Navigational spatial displays: The role of metacognition as cognitive load. Learning and Instruction,17, 89-105.
86. Shapiro, A. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research and Development,56, 29-44.
87. Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and i ndings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology(pp. 605-622). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive l exibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia(pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89. Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
90. Thiede, K. T., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24, 1024-1037.
91. Thillmann, H., Künsting, J., Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2009). Is it merely a question of “what” to prompt or also “when” to prompt? Zeitschrift für P ä dagogische Psychologie,23, 105-115.
92. Valcke, M. (2002). Cognitive load: Updating the theory? Learning and Instruction,12, 147-154.
93. Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Can instruction as such affect learning? The case of learner control. Computers and Education,57, 2322-2332.
94. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Aflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning,1, 3-14.
95. Winne, P. H. (2005). A perspective on state-of-the-art research on self-regulated learning. Instructional Science,33, 559-565.
96. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice(pp. 277-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 259-277). New York: Routledge.
98. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development,44, 17-27.
99. Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,8, 331-358.
100. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice,41, 64-70.
101. Zottmann, J. M., Goeze, A., Frank, C., Zentner, U., Fischer, F., & Schrader, J. (2012). Fostering the analytical competency of pre-service teachers in a computersupported case-based learning environment: A matter of perspective? Interactive Learning Environments,20, 513-532.