Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-43

  McNamara, Danielle S ^a,b   Kintsch, Eileen ^a   Songer, Nancy Butler ^a   Kintsch, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002834054     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Substantive and methodological considerations for productive textbook analysis. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 496-512). New York: Macmillan.
3. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 251-276.
4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Beyer, R. (1987). Psychologische Untersuchungen zur Textverarbeitung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Modells von Kintsch und v. Dijk (1978) [Psychological studies of textprocessing within the framework of the van Dijk and Kintsch model (1978)]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Suppl. 8, 1-96.
6. Beyer, R. (1990). Psychologische Untersuchungen zur Gestaltung von Instruktionstexten [Psychological studies concerning the construction of instructional texts]. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 39(1), 69-75.
7. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's model to improve instructional text: Effects of inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
8. Carroll, M., & Nelson, T. O. (1993). Failure to obtain a generation effect during naturalistic learning. Memory & Cognition, 21, 361-366.
9. Chi, M. T. H., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Owen, P. D., & Coté, N. C. (1990). Encoding and recall of texts: The importance of material appropriate processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 566-581.
11. Healy, A. F., Clawson, D. M., McNamara, D. S., Marmie, W. R., Schneider, V. I., Rickard, T. C., Crutcher, R. J., King, C., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1993). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 135-164). New York: Academic.
12. Healy, A. F., & Sinclair, G. P. (in press). Long-term retention of training and knowledge. In E. Bjork & R. Bjork (Eds.), The handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 10. Memory. New York: Academic.
13. Keefe, D. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446-463.
14. Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
15. Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 161-195.
16. Kintsch, E., McNamara, D. S., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Revising the coherence of science texts to improve comprehension and learning: I. Traits of mammals (ICS Tech. Rep. No. 92-3). Boulder University of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science.
17. Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
18. Kintsch, W. (1992). A cognitive architecture for comprehension. In H. L. Pick, P. van den Broek, & D. C. Knill (Eds.), The study of cognition: Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 143-164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 292-303.
20. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
21. Kintsch, W., & Vipond, D. (1979). Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives of memory research (pp. 325-366). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Mannes, S., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115.
23. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645-656.
24. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 79-93.
25. McNamara, D. S. (1995). Effects of prior knowledge on the generation advantage: Calculators versus calculation to learn simple multiplication. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 307-318.
26. McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995). A generation advantage for multiplication skill and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills (pp. 132-169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Miller, J., & Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short term prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335-354.
28. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465.
29. O'Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1985). When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 12-21.
30. Perrig, W., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 503-518.
31. Raintree Illustrated Science Encyclopedia (Vol. 8). (1984). Milwaukee: Author.
32. Rauenbusch, F., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Making reading more difficult: A degraded text microworld for teaching reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 181-206.
33. Roller, C. M. (1990). Commentary: The interaction of knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 79-89.
34. Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279-294.
35. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
36. Silver Burdett & Ginn. (1987). Life science. Morristown, NJ: Author.
37. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
38. Smolensky, P. (1986). Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing ( Vol. 1, pp. 194-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.