Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension

Discourse Processes

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 171-191

  Salmerón, Ladislao ^a   Cañas, José J ^a   Kintsch, Walter ^b   Fajardo, Inmaculada ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30544448897     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp4003_1     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 23-42.
2. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., Young, M. F., & Owen, S. V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches. Instructional Science, 24, 377-395.
3. Barab, S. A., Fajen, B. R., Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (1996). Assessing hypertext navigation through Pathfinder: Prospects and limitations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 185-205.
4. Barab, S.A., Young, M. F., & Wang, J. (1999). The effects of navigational and generative activities in hypertext learning on problem solving and comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26, 283-309.
5. Brinkerhoff, J. D., Klein, J. D., & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2001). Effects of overviews and computer experience on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 427-440.
6. Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, R., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
8. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, M., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
9. Danner, F. W. (1976). Children's understanding of intersentence organization in the recall of short descriptive passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 174-183.
10. De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 18, 219-231.
11. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322-349.
12. Ferstl, E. C., & Kintsch, W. (1999). Learning from text: Structural knowledge assessment in the study of discourse comprehension. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 247-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-307.
15. Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. (1990). Flexibility in text processing: A strategy competition model. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 181-219.
16. Goldman, S. R., Saul, E., & Coté, N. (1995). Paragraphing, reader, and task effects on discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 273-305.
17. Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129-140.
18. Horney, M. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The electrotext project: Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 71-91.
19. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
20. Kintsch, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. F. Healy, S. N. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 216-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
23. Kintsch, W., & Yarbrough, J. C. (1982). The role of rhetorical structure in text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 828-834.
24. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385-399.
25. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest, and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51-70.
26. Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W. (2002). Children's hypermedia navigational strategies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34, 274-284.
27. Lodewijks, H. (1982). Self-regulated versus teacher-provided sequencing of information in learning from text. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 509-520). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209-234.
29. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
30. Mayer, R. E. (1976). Some conditions of meaningful learning for computer programming: Advance organizers and subject control of frame order. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 143-150.
31. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247-288.
32. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interaction of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-42.
33. McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Moeller, J., & Mueller-Kalthoff, T. (2000). Lernen mit hypertext: Effekte von navigationshilfen und vorwissen [Learning with hypertext: The impact of navigational aids and prior knowledge]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 116-123.
35. Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 360-374.
36. Mueller-Kalthoff, T., & Moeller. J. (2003). The effects of graphical overviews, prior knowledge, and self-concept on hypertext disorientation and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12, 117-134.
37. Naumann, A., Waniek, J., & Krems, J. F. (2001). Knowledge acquisition, navigation and eye movements from text and hypertext. In U. D. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 293-304). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
38. Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. J., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 237-255.
39. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers' prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327-345.
40. Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., Snyder, B. L., & Turnure, J. E. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 268-278.
41. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Hübscher, R. (2003). Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 395-428.
42. Quathamer, D., & Heineken, E. (2002). Kohärenzbildung beim lesen von texten: Fishye-views als kognitive Werkzeuge [Maintaining global coherence during reading: Fisheye views as cognitive tools]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 34, 72-79.
43. Rouet, J.-L., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
44. Schnotz, W. (1982). How do different readers learn with different text organizations? In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 87-97). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
45. Schnotz, W. (1984). Comparative instructional text organization. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 53-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
46. Schnotz, W. (1993). Adaptive construction of mental representations in understanding expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 114-120.
47. Shapiro, A. M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1-35.
48. Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143-167.
49. Shapiro, A. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57-78.
50. Snapp, J. C., & Glover. J. A. (1990). Advance organizers and study questions. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 266-271.
51. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-288.
52. Unz, D. C., & Hesse, F. W. (1999). The use of hypertext for learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 279-295.
53. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
54. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Executive control in reading comprehension. In B. K. Britton & S. M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 1-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Waniek, J., Brunstein, A., Naumann, A., & Krems, J. F. (2003). Interaction between text structure representation and situation model in hypertext reading. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 103-111.