Receptor-ligand molecular docking

Biophysical Reviews

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-87

  Guedes, Isabella A ^a   de Magalhães, Camila S ^b   Dardenne, Laurent E ^a  

^a LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Protein ligand docking; Scoring functions; Search algorithms; Structure based drug design

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BINDING AFFINITY; DRUG DESIGN; EMPIRICAL SCORING; ENSEMBLE DOCKING; FORCE FIELD BASED SCORING; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SCORING; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LIGAND DOCKING; RECEPTOR BINDING; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84897767131     PISSN: 18672450     EISSN: 18672469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12551-013-0130-2     Document Type: Review

References (174)

1. Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D (1994) ICM: A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comput Chem 15: 488-506. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 540150503.
2. Apostolakis J, Plückthun A, Caflisch A (1998) Docking small ligands in flexible binding sites. J Comput Chem 19: 21-37. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19980115)19: 1<21:: AID-JCC2>3. 0. CO;2-0.
3. Aqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE (1994) A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Eng 7: 385-391.
4. Armen RS, Chen J, Brooks CL (2009) An Evaluation of Explicit Receptor Flexibility in Molecular Docking Using Molecular Dynamics and Torsion Angle Molecular Dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 5: 2909-2923. doi: 10. 1021/ct900262t.
5. Asses Y, Venkatraman V, Leroux V et al (2012) Exploring c-Met kinase flexibility by sampling and clustering its conformational space. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 80: 1227-1238. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 24021.
6. Ballester PJ, Mitchell JBO (2010) A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics 26: 1169-1175. doi: 10. 1093/bioinformatics/btq112.
7. Baxter CA, Murray CW, Clark DE et al (1998) Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins 33: 367-382.
8. Beier C, Zacharias M (2010) Tackling the challenges posed by target flexibility in drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov 5: 347-359. doi: 10. 1517/17460441003713462.
9. Bissantz C, Folkers G, Rognan D (2000) Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J Med Chem 43: 4759-4767.
10. Böhm HJ (1992) The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 6: 61-78.
11. Bolton EE, Wang Y, Thiessen PA, Bryant SH (2008) Chapter 12 in. Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry, vol 4. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 217-241.
12. B-Rao C, Subramanian J, Sharma SD (2009) Managing protein flexibility in docking and its applications. Drug Discov Today 14: 394-400. doi: 10. 1016/j. drudis. 2009. 01. 003.
13. Brooijmans N, Humblet C (2010) Chemical space sampling by different scoring functions and crystal structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 24: 433-447. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-010-9356-2.
14. Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID (2003) Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32: 335-373. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. biophys. 32. 110601. 142532.
15. Carlson HA (2002) Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 8: 1571-1578.
16. Cavasotto C, Singh N (2008) Docking and High Throughput Docking: Successes and the Challenge of Protein Flexibility. Curr Comput Aided-Drug Des 4: 221-234. doi: 10. 2174/157340908785747474.
17. Chang MW, Ayeni C, Breuer S, Torbett BE (2010) Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: a comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina. PLoS ONE 5: e11955. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0011955.
18. Changeux J-P, Edelstein S (2011) Conformational selection or induced-fit? 50 years of debate resolved. Biol Rep. doi: 10. 3410/B3-19. F1000.
19. Charifson PS, Corkery JJ, Murcko MA, Walters WP (1999) Consensus Scoring: A Method for Obtaining Improved Hit Rates from Docking Databases of Three-Dimensional Structures into Proteins. J Med Chem 42: 5100-5109. doi: 10. 1021/jm990352k.
20. Cheng T, Li X, Li Y et al (2009) Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set. J Chem Inf Model 49: 1079-1093. doi: 10. 1021/ci9000053.
21. Cheng T, Li Q, Zhou Z et al (2012) Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review. AAPS J 14: 133-141. doi: 10. 1208/s12248-012-9322-0.
22. Clark DE, Westhead DR (1996) Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 10: 337-358. doi: 10. 1007/BF00124503.
23. Clark DE, Wiley InterScience (Online service) (2000) Evolutionary algorithms in molecular design. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
24. Craig IR, Essex JW, Spiegel K (2010) Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments. J Chem Inf Model 50: 511-524. doi: 10. 1021/ci900407c.
25. Damm-Ganamet KL, Smith RD, Dunbar JB et al (2013) CSAR Benchmark Exercise 2011-2012: Evaluation of Results from Docking and Relative Ranking of Blinded Congeneric Series. J. Chem. Inf. Model 53: 1853-1870.
26. De Amorim HLN, Caceres RA, Netz PA (2008) Linear interaction energy (LIE) method in lead discovery and optimization. Curr Drug Targets 9: 1100-1105.
27. De Azevedo WF Jr, Dias R (2008) Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity. Curr Drug Targets 9: 1031-1039.
28. de Magalhães CS, Barbosa HJC, Dardenne LE (2004a) Selection-Insertion Schemes in Genetic Algorithms for the Flexible Ligand Docking Problem. In: Deb K (ed) Genetic Evolutionary Computation, GECCO 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 368-379.
29. de Magalhães CS, Barbosa HJC, Dardenne LE (2004b) A genetic algorithm for the ligand-protein docking problem. Genet Mol Biol 27: 605-610. doi: 10. 1590/S1415-47572004000400022.
30. Desmet J, Wilson IA, Joniau M et al (1997) Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains. FASEB J 11: 164-172.
31. Dietzen M, Zotenko E, Hildebrandt A, Lengauer T (2012) On the applicability of elastic network normal modes in small-molecule docking. J Chem Inf Model 52: 844-856. doi: 10. 1021/ci2004847.
32. Doman TN, McGovern SL, Witherbee BJ et al (2002) Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J Med Chem 45: 2213-2221.
33. Dunkel M (2006) SuperNatural: a searchable database of available natural compounds. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D678-D683. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkj132.
34. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR et al (1997) Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des 11: 425-445.
35. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) DOCK 4. 0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15: 411-428.
36. Feher M (2006) Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. Drug Discov Today 11: 421-428. doi: 10. 1016/j. drudis. 2006. 03. 009.
37. Ferrari AM, Wei BQ, Costantino L, Shoichet BK (2004) Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. J Med Chem 47: 5076-5084. doi: 10. 1021/jm049756p.
38. Flick J, Tristram F, Wenzel W (2012) Modeling loop backbone flexibility in receptor-ligand docking simulations. J Comput Chem 33: 2504-2515. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 23087.
39. Forrey C, Douglas JF, Gilson MK (2012) The fundamental role of flexibility on the strength of molecular binding. Soft Matter 8: 6385. doi: 10. 1039/c2sm25160d.
40. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB et al (2004) Glide: A New Approach for Rapid, Accurate Docking and Scoring. 1. Method and Assessment of Docking Accuracy. J Med Chem 47: 1739-1749. doi: 10. 1021/jm0306430.
41. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP et al (2006) Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem 49: 6177-6196. doi: 10. 1021/jm051256o.
42. Frimurer TM, Peters GH, Iversen LF et al (2003) Ligand-induced conformational changes: improved predictions of ligand binding conformations and affinities. Biophys J 84: 2273-2281. doi: 10. 1016/S0006-3495(03)75033-4.
43. Gallicchio E, Lapelosa M, Levy RM (2010) Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for Estimation of Protein - Ligand Binding Affinities. J Chem Theory Comput 6: 2961-2977. doi: 10. 1021/ct1002913.
44. García (1992) Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys Rev Lett 68: 2696-2699.
45. Gaulton A, Bellis LJ, Bento AP et al (2011) ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D1100-D1107. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkr777.
46. Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (1990) Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 8: 195-202. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 340080302.
47. Gutiérrez-de-Terán H, Aqvist J (2012) Linear interaction energy: method and applications in drug design. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton NJ) 819: 305-323. doi: 10. 1007/978-1-61779-465-0_20.
48. Haider MK, Bertrand H-O, Hubbard RE (2011) Predicting Fragment Binding Poses Using a Combined MCSS MM-GBSA Approach. J Chem Inf Model 51: 1092-1105. doi: 10. 1021/ci100469n.
49. Halgren TA (1996) Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J Comput Chem 17: 490-519. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17: 5/6<490:: AID-JCC1>3. 0. CO;2-P.
50. Hao M, Li Y, Zhang S-W, Yang W (2011) Investigation on the binding mode of benzothiophene analogues as potent factor IXa (FIXa) inhibitors in thrombosis by CoMFA, docking and molecular dynamic studies. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 26: 792-804. doi: 10. 3109/14756366. 2011. 554414.
51. Hong L, Hartsuck JA, Foundling S et al (1998) Active-site mobility in human immunodeficiency virus, type 1, protease as demonstrated by crystal structure of A28S mutant. Protein Sci 7: 300-305. doi: 10. 1002/pro. 5560070209.
52. Houston DR, Walkinshaw MD (2013) Consensus Docking: Improving the Reliability of Docking in a Virtual Screening Context. J Chem Inf Model 53: 384-390. doi: 10. 1021/ci300399w.
53. Huang S-Y, Zou X (2010) Advances and Challenges in Protein-Ligand Docking. Int J Mol Sci 11: 3016-3034. doi: 10. 3390/ijms11083016.
54. Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking Sets for Molecular Docking. J Med Chem 49: 6789-6801. doi: 10. 1021/jm0608356.
55. Huang Z, Wong CF, Wheeler RA (2008) Flexible protein-flexible ligand docking with disrupted velocity simulated annealing. Proteins 71: 440-454. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 21781.
56. Huang S-Y, Grinter SZ, Zou X (2010) Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12: 12899-12908. doi: 10. 1039/c0cp00151a.
57. Irwin JJ, Sterling T, Mysinger MM et al (2012) ZINC: A Free Tool to Discover Chemistry for Biology. J Chem Inf Model 52: 1757-1768. doi: 10. 1021/ci3001277.
58. Jacobsson M, Lidén P, Stjernschantz E et al (2003) Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening by Multivariate Analysis of Scoring Data. J Med Chem 46: 5781-5789. doi: 10. 1021/jm030896t.
59. Jain AN (2000) Morphological similarity: a 3D molecular similarity method correlated with protein-ligand recognition. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14: 199-213.
60. Jain AN, Nicholls A (2008) Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 22: 133-139. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-008-9196-5.
61. Jiang F, Kim SH (1991) "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 219: 79-102.
62. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 245: 43-53.
63. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC et al (1997) Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 267: 727-748. doi: 10. 1006/jmbi. 1996. 0897.
64. Kalliokoski T, Salo HS, Lahtela-Kakkonen M, Poso A (2009) The effect of ligand-based tautomer and protomer prediction on structure-based virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 49: 2742-2748. doi: 10. 1021/ci900364w.
65. Kar G, Keskin O, Gursoy A, Nussinov R (2010) Allostery and population shift in drug discovery. Curr Opin Pharmacol 10: 715-722. doi: 10. 1016/j. coph. 2010. 09. 002.
66. Keserû GM, Kolossváry I (2001) Fully flexible low-mode docking: application to induced fit in HIV integrase. J Am Chem Soc 123: 12708-12709.
67. Kim R, Skolnick J (2008) Assessment of programs for ligand binding affinity prediction. J Comput Chem 29: 1316-1331. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 20893.
68. Kinnings SL, Jackson RM (2009) LigMatch: a multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening. J Chem Inf Model 49: 2056-2066. doi: 10. 1021/ci900204y.
69. Knegtel RM, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM (1997) Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J Mol Biol 266: 424-440. doi: 10. 1006/jmbi. 1996. 0776.
70. Kokh DB, Wade RC, Wenzel W (2011) Receptor flexibility in small-molecule docking calculations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 1: 298-314. doi: 10. 1002/wcms. 29.
71. Kolb P, Irwin JJ (2009) Docking screens: right for the right reasons? Curr Top Med Chem 9: 755-770.
72. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C et al (2000) Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res 33: 889-897.
73. Kolossváry I, Guida WC (1999) Low-mode conformational search elucidated: Application to C39H80 and flexible docking of 9-deazaguanine inhibitors into PNP. J Comput Chem 20: 1671-1684. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19991130)20: 15<1671:: AID-JCC7>3. 0. CO;2-Y.
74. Kolossváry I, Keserû GM (2001) Hessian-free low-mode conformational search for large-scale protein loop optimization: application to c-jun N-terminal kinase JNK3. J Comput Chem 22: 21-30. doi: 10. 1002/1096-987X(20010115)22: 1<21:: AID-JCC3>3. 0. CO;2-I.
75. Korb O, Stützle T, Exner TE (2006) PLANTS: Application of Ant Colony Optimization to Structure-Based Drug Design. In: Dorigo M, Gambardella LM, Birattari M et al (eds) Ant Colony Optimisation Swarm Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 247-258.
76. Korb O, Stützle T, Exner TE (2009) Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein - Ligand Docking with PLANTS. J Chem Inf Model 49: 84-96. doi: 10. 1021/ci800298z.
77. Korb O, McCabe P, Cole J (2011) The Ensemble Performance Index: An Improved Measure for Assessing Ensemble Pose Prediction Performance. J Chem Inf Model 51: 2915-2919. doi: 10. 1021/ci2002796.
78. Korb O, Olsson TSG, Bowden SJ et al (2012) Potential and Limitations of Ensemble Docking. J Chem Inf Model 52: 1262-1274. doi: 10. 1021/ci2005934.
79. Krüger DM, Evers A (2010) Comparison of structure- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols considering hit list complementarity and enrichment factors. Chem Med Chem 5: 148-158. doi: 10. 1002/cmdc. 200900314.
80. Kuhl FS, Crippen GM, Friesen DK (1984) A combinatorial algorithm for calculating ligand binding. J Comput Chem 5: 24-34. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 540050105.
81. Kukol A (2011) Consensus virtual screening approaches to predict protein ligands. Eur J Med Chem 46: 4661-4664. doi: 10. 1016/j. ejmech. 2011. 05. 026.
82. Lagorce D, Sperandio O, Galons H et al (2008) FAF-Drugs2: Free ADME/tox filtering tool to assist drug discovery and chemical biology projects. BMC Bioinform 9: 396. doi: 10. 1186/1471-2105-9-396.
83. Lang PT, Brozell SR, Mukherjee S et al (2009) DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. RNA 15: 1219-1230. doi: 10. 1261/rna. 1563609.
84. Leach AR (1994) Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. J Mol Biol 235: 345-356.
85. Li Y, Liu Z, Wang R (2010) Test MM-PB/SA on True Conformational Ensembles of Protein - Ligand Complexes. J Chem Inf Model 50: 1682-1692. doi: 10. 1021/ci100036a.
86. Li L, Khanna M, Jo I et al (2011a) Target-Specific Support Vector Machine Scoring in Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Computational Validation, In Vitro Testing in Kinases, and Effects on Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation. J Chem Inf Model 51: 755-759. doi: 10. 1021/ci100490w.
87. Li Y, Kim DJ, Ma W et al (2011b) Discovery of Novel Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Crystal Structures. J Chem Inf Model 51: 2904-2914. doi: 10. 1021/ci200257b.
88. Li G-B, Yang L-L, Wang W-J et al (2013) ID-Score: A New Empirical Scoring Function Based on a Comprehensive Set of Descriptors Related to Protein-Ligand Interactions. J Chem Inf Model 53: 592-600. doi: 10. 1021/ci300493w.
89. Lill MA (2011) Efficient Incorporation of Protein Flexibility and Dynamics into Molecular Docking Simulations. Biochemistry (Mosc) 50: 6157-6169. doi: 10. 1021/bi2004558.
90. Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X et al (2007) BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D198-D201. doi: 10. 1093/nar/gkl999.
91. Logean A, Sette A, Rognan D (2001) Customized versus universal scoring functions: application to class I MHC-peptide binding free energy predictions. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11: 675-679.
92. Lu I-L, Wang H (2012) Protein-specific Scoring Method for Ligand Discovery. J Comput Biol 19: 1215-1226. doi: 10. 1089/cmb. 2012. 0188.
93. Luty BA, Wasserman ZR, Stouten PFW et al (1995) A molecular mechanics/grid method for evaluation of ligand-receptor interactions. J Comput Chem 16: 454-464. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 540160409.
94. Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (1999) Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng 12: 713-720.
95. Madhavi Sastry G, Adzhigirey M, Day T et al (2013) Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27: 221-234. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-013-9644-8.
96. Maghsoudi AH, Khodagholi F, Hadi-Alijanvand H et al (2011) Homology modeling, docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and structural analyses of coxsakievirus B3 2A protease: an enzyme involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory myocarditis. Int J Biol Macromol 49: 487-492. doi: 10. 1016/j. ijbiomac. 2011. 05. 023.
97. Mangoni M, Roccatano D, Di Nola A (1999) Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. Proteins 35: 153-162.
98. Marsh JA, Teichmann SA, Forman-Kay JD (2012) Probing the diverse landscape of protein flexibility and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22: 643-650. doi: 10. 1016/j. sbi. 2012. 08. 008.
99. Martin YC (2009) Let's not forget tautomers. J Comput Aided Mol Des 23: 693-704. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-009-9303-2.
100. Meiler J, Baker D (2006) ROSETTALIGAND: protein-small molecule docking with full side-chain flexibility. Proteins 65: 538-548. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 21086.
101. Miller DW, Dill KA (1997) Ligand binding to proteins: The binding landscape model. Protein Sci 6: 2166-2179. doi: 10. 1002/pro. 5560061011.
102. Miller MD, Kearsley SK, Underwood DJ, Sheridan RP (1994) FLOG: a system to select "quasi-flexible" ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8: 153-174.
103. Mizutani MY, Takamatsu Y, Ichinose T et al (2006) Effective handling of induced-fit motion in flexible docking. Proteins 63: 878-891. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 20931.
104. Mobley DL, Dill KA (2009) Binding of Small-Molecule Ligands to Proteins: "What You See" Is Not Always "What You Get. Structure 17: 489-498.
105. Moitessier N, Englebienne P, Lee D et al (2009) Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go: Docking/scoring methods-a review. Br J Pharmacol 153: S7-S26. doi: 10. 1038/sj. bjp. 0707515.
106. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS et al (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19: 1639-1662. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19: 14<1639:: AID-JCC10>3. 0. CO;2-B.
107. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W et al (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30: 2785-2791. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 21256.
108. Muegge I (2006) PMF scoring revisited. J Med Chem 49: 5895-5902. doi: 10. 1021/jm050038s.
109. Nabuurs SB, Wagener M, de Vlieg J (2007) A Flexible Approach to Induced Fit Docking. J Med Chem 50: 6507-6518. doi: 10. 1021/jm070593p.
110. Neves MAC, Totrov M, Abagyan R (2012) Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26: 675-686. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-012-9547-0.
111. Nichols SE, Baron R, Ivetac A, McCammon JA (2011) Predictive Power of Molecular Dynamics Receptor Structures in Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 51: 1439-1446. doi: 10. 1021/ci200117n.
112. Nishibata Y, Itai A (1991) Automatic creation of drug candidate structures based on receptor structure. Starting point for artificial lead generation. Tetrahedron 47: 8985-8990. doi: 10. 1016/S0040-4020(01)86503-0.
113. Nishibata Y, Itai A (1993) Confirmation of usefulness of a structure construction program based on three-dimensional receptor structure for rational lead generation. J Med Chem 36: 2921-2928.
114. Novoa EM, de Pouplana LR, Barril X, Orozco M (2010) Ensemble Docking from Homology Models. J Chem Theory Comput 6: 2547-2557. doi: 10. 1021/ct100246y.
115. Nowosielski M, Hoffmann M, Kuron A et al (2013) The MM2QM tool for combining docking, molecular dynamics, molecular mechanics, and quantum mechanics†. J Comput Chem 34: 750-756. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 23192.
116. Oda A, Tsuchida K, Takakura T et al (2006) Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein - Ligand Complexes. J Chem Inf Model 46: 380-391. doi: 10. 1021/ci050283k.
117. Park S-J, Kufareva I, Abagyan R (2010) Improved docking, screening and selectivity prediction for small molecule nuclear receptor modulators using conformational ensembles. J Comput Aided Mol Des 24: 459-471. doi: 10. 1007/s10822-010-9362-4.
118. Paulsen MD, Ornstein RL (1993) Substrate mobility in thiocamphor-bound cytochrome P450cam: an explanation of the conflict between the observed product profile and the X-ray structure. Protein Eng 6: 359-365.
119. Pearce BC, Langley DR, Kang J et al (2009) E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization. J Chem Inf Model 49: 1797-1809. doi: 10. 1021/ci900073k.
120. Pei J, Wang Q, Liu Z et al (2006) PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking. Proteins 62: 934-946. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 20790.
121. Petukh M, Stefl S, Alexov E (2013) The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding. Curr Pharm Des 19: 4182-4190.
122. Pierce AC, Sandretto KL, Bemis GW (2002) Kinase inhibitors and the case for CH.O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand binding. Proteins 49: 567-576. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 10259.
123. Plewczynski D, Łaźniewski M, Augustyniak R, Ginalski K (2011) Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database. J Comput Chem 32: 742-755. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 21643.
124. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T (1995) Time-efficient docking of flexible ligands into active sites of proteins. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 3: 300-308.
125. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 261: 470-489. doi: 10. 1006/jmbi. 1996. 0477.
126. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T (1997) Multiple automatic base selection: protein-ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention. J Comput Aided Mol Des 11: 369-384.
127. Rejto PA, Verkhivker GM (1996) Unraveling principles of lead discovery: from unfrustrated energy landscapes to novel molecular anchors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 8945-8950.
128. Ripphausen P, Nisius B, Bajorath J (2011) State-of-the-art in ligand-based virtual screening. Drug Discov Today 16: 372-376. doi: 10. 1016/j. drudis. 2011. 02. 011.
129. Rueda M, Bottegoni G, Abagyan R (2009) Consistent Improvement of Cross-Docking Results Using Binding Site Ensembles Generated with Elastic Network Normal Modes. J Chem Inf Model 49: 716-725. doi: 10. 1021/ci8003732.
130. Rueda M, Bottegoni G, Abagyan R (2010) Recipes for the Selection of Experimental Protein Conformations for Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 50: 186-193. doi: 10. 1021/ci9003943.
131. Schaffer L, Verkhivker GM (1998) Predicting structural effects in HIV-1 protease mutant complexes with flexible ligand docking and protein side-chain optimization. Proteins 33: 295-310.
132. Schlosser J, Rarey M (2009) Beyond the virtual screening paradigm: structure-based searching for new lead compounds. J Chem Inf Model 49: 800-809. doi: 10. 1021/ci9000212.
133. Schnecke V, Kuhn L (2000) Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced complementarity. Perspect Drug Discov Des 20: 171-190. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1008737207775.
134. Seifert MHJ (2009) Targeted scoring functions for virtual screening. Drug Discov Today 14: 562-569. doi: 10. 1016/j. drudis. 2009. 03. 013.
135. Sherman W, Day T, Jacobson MP et al (2006) Novel Procedure for Modeling Ligand/Receptor Induced Fit Effects. J Med Chem 49: 534-553. doi: 10. 1021/jm050540c.
136. Shin W-H, Seok C (2012) GalaxyDock: Protein-Ligand Docking with Flexible Protein Side-chains. J Chem Inf Model 52: 3225-3232. doi: 10. 1021/ci300342z.
137. Shoichet BK, Leach AR, Kuntz ID (1999) Ligand solvation in molecular docking. Proteins 34: 4-16.
138. Smellie AS, Crippen GM, Richards WG (1991) Fast drug-receptor mapping by site-directed distances: a novel method of predicting new pharmacological leads. J Chem Inf Model 31: 386-392. doi: 10. 1021/ci00003a004.
139. Söderhjelm P, Kongsted J, Genheden S, Ryde U (2010) Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci 2: 21-37. doi: 10. 1007/s12539-010-0083-0.
140. Sokkar P, Sathis V, Ramachandran M (2011) Computational modeling on the recognition of the HRE motif by HIF-1: molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies. J Mol Model 18: 1691-1700. doi: 10. 1007/s00894-011-1150-0.
141. Sotriffer CA, Dramburg I (2005) "In situ cross-docking" to simultaneously address multiple targets. J Med Chem 48: 3122-3125. doi: 10. 1021/jm050075j.
142. Sperandio O, Mouawad L, Pinto E et al (2010) How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis. Eur Biophys J EBJ 39: 1365-1372. doi: 10. 1007/s00249-010-0592-0.
143. Stjernschantz E, Oostenbrink C (2010) Improved ligand-protein binding affinity predictions using multiple binding modes. Biophys J 98: 2682-2691. doi: 10. 1016/j. bpj. 2010. 02. 034.
144. Stoll V, Qin W, Stewart KD et al (2002) X-ray crystallographic structure of ABT-378 (lopinavir) bound to HIV-1 protease. Bioorg Med Chem 10: 2803-2806.
145. Takaya D, Yamashita A, Kamijo K et al (2011) A new method for induced fit docking (GENIUS) and its application to virtual screening of novel HCV NS3-4A protease inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 19: 6892-6905. doi: 10. 1016/j. bmc. 2011. 09. 023.
146. Teodoro ML, Kavraki LE (2003) Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. Curr Pharm Des 9: 1635-1648.
147. Teodoro ML, Phillips GN Jr, Kavraki LE (2003) Understanding protein flexibility through dimensionality reduction. J Comput Biol 10: 617-634. doi: 10. 1089/10665270360688228.
148. Teramoto R, Kashima H (2010) Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning. J Mol Graph Model 29: 492-497. doi: 10. 1016/j. jmgm. 2010. 09. 006.
149. Terp GE, Johansen BN, Christensen IT, Jørgensen FS (2001) A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities. J Med Chem 44: 2333-2343.
150. Trosset J-Y, Scheraga HA (1999) Prodock: Software package for protein modeling and docking. J Comput Chem 20: 412-427. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199903)20: 4<412:: AID-JCC3>3. 0. CO;2-N.
151. Tsai CJ, Ma B, Nussinov R (1999) Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9970-9972.
152. Tuffery P, Derreumaux P (2011) Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches. J R Soc Interface 9: 20-33. doi: 10. 1098/rsif. 2011. 0584.
153. Velec HFG, Gohlke H, Klebe G (2005) DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J Med Chem 48: 6296-6303. doi: 10. 1021/jm050436v.
154. Venkatraman V, Ritchie DW (2012) Flexible protein docking refinement using pose-dependent normal mode analysis. Proteins 80: 2262-2274. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 24115.
155. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ et al (2003) Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 52: 609-623. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 10465.
156. Verdonk ML, Berdini V, Hartshorn MJ et al (2004) Virtual Screening Using Protein-Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment. J Chem Inf Model 44: 793-806. doi: 10. 1021/ci034289q.
157. Vigers GPA, Rizzi JP (2004) Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening. J Med Chem 47: 80-89. doi: 10. 1021/jm030161o.
158. Wallqvist A, Covell DG (1996) Docking enzyme-inhibitor complexes using a preference-based free-energy surface. Proteins 25: 403-419. doi: 10. 1002/prot. 1.
159. Wang J-C, Lin J-H (2013) Scoring functions for prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Curr Pharm Des 19: 2174-2182.
160. Wang J, Verkhivker GM (2003) Energy landscape theory, funnels, specificity, and optimal criterion of biomolecular binding. Phys Rev Lett 90: 188101.
161. Wang J, Morin P, Wang W, Kollman PA (2001) Use of MM-PBSA in reproducing the binding free energies to HIV-1 RT of TIBO derivatives and predicting the binding mode to HIV-1 RT of efavirenz by docking and MM-PBSA. J Am Chem Soc 123: 5221-5230.
162. Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S (2003) Comparative Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions for Molecular Docking. J Med Chem 46: 2287-2303. doi: 10. 1021/jm0203783.
163. Wang J, Kang X, Kuntz ID, Kollman PA (2005) Hierarchical database screenings for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using a pharmacophore model, rigid docking, solvation docking, and MM-PB/SA. J Med Chem 48: 2432-2444. doi: 10. 1021/jm049606e.
164. Weber J, Mesters JR, Lepsík M et al (2002) Unusual binding mode of an HIV-1 protease inhibitor explains its potency against multi-drug-resistant virus strains. J Mol Biol 324: 739-754.
165. Welch W, Ruppert J, Jain AN (1996) Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. Chem Biol 3: 449-462.
166. Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks CL, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER?A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J Comput Chem 24: 1549-1562. doi: 10. 1002/jcc. 10306.
167. Xue M, Zheng M, Xiong B et al (2010) Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions in Drug Design. 1. Developing a Target-Specific Method for Kinase - Ligand Interactions. J Chem Inf Model 50: 1378-1386. doi: 10. 1021/ci100182c.
168. Yan Z, Wang J (2012) Specificity quantification of biomolecular recognition and its implication for drug discovery. Sci Rep. doi: 10. 1038/srep00309.
169. Yang C-Y, Wang R, Wang S (2006) M-Score: A Knowledge-Based Potential Scoring Function Accounting for Protein Atom Mobility. J Med Chem 49: 5903-5911. doi: 10. 1021/jm050043w.
170. Yang C-Y, Sun H, Chen J et al (2009) Importance of Ligand Reorganization Free Energy in Protein - Ligand Binding-Affinity Prediction. J Am Chem Soc 131: 13709-13721. doi: 10. 1021/ja9039373.
171. Yuriev E, Ramsland PA (2013) Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010-2011 in review. J Mol Recognit JMR 26: 215-239. doi: 10. 1002/jmr. 2266.
172. Zacharias M, Sklenar H (1999) Harmonic modes as variables to approximately account for receptor flexibility in ligand-receptor docking simulations: Application to DNA minor groove ligand complex. J Comput Chem 20: 287-300. doi: 10. 1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199902)20: 3<287:: AID-JCC1>3. 0. CO;2-H.
173. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C (1997) Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 267: 707-726. doi: 10. 1006/jmbi. 1996. 0859.
174. Zsoldos Z, Reid D, Simon A et al (2007) eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system. J Mol Graph Model 26: 198-212. doi: 10. 1016/j. jmgm. 2006. 06. 002.