A flexible approach to induced fit docking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 50, Issue 26, 2007, Pages 6507-6518

  Nabuurs, Sander B ^a   Wagener, Markus ^b   De Vlieg, Jacob ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b N V Organon ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDOSTERONE; CORTICOSTERONE; CORTISONE; DEOXYCORTICOSTERONE; LIGAND; MINERALOCORTICOID RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE; SPIRONOLACTONE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEPTOR BINDING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; CYCLIC AMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, MINERALOCORTICOID;

EID: 37349085453     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm070593p     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
2. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
3. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
4. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
5. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
6. Halgren, T. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Friesner, R. A.; Beard, H. S.; Frye, L. L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750-1759.
7. Carlson, H. A.; McCammon, J. A. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 57, 213-218.
8. Teague, S. J. Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 527-541.
9. Fischer, E. Über die Optischen Isomeren des Traubenzuckers, der Gluconsäure und der Zuckersäure. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1890, 23, 2611.
10. Koshland, D. E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1958, 44, 98-104.
11. Alonso, H.; Bliznyuk, A. A.; Gready, J. E. Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 531-568.
12. Carlson, H. A. Protein flexibility and drug design: How to hit a moving target. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2002, 6, 447-452.
13. Teodora, M. L.; Kavraki, L. E. Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. Curr. Pharm. Des 2003, 9, 1635-1648.
14. Barril, X.; Fradera, X. Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2006, 1, 335-349.
15. Arevalo, J. H.; Stura, E. A.; Taussig, M. J.; Wilson, I. A. Three-dimensional structure of an anti-steroid Fab′ and progesterone-Fab′ complex. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 231, 103-118.
16. Noble, M. E.; Endicott, J. A.; Johnson, L. N. Protein kinase inhibitors: Insights into drug design from structure. Science 2004, 303, 1800-1805.
17. Anderson, A. C.; O'Neil, R. H.; Surti, T. S.; Stroud, R. M. Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 445-457.
18. Sherman, W.; Day, T.; Jacobson, M. P.; Friesner, R. A.; Farid, R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 534-553.
19. Hooft, R. W.; Sander, C.; Vriend, G. Positioning hydrogen atoms by optimizing hydrogen-bond networks in protein structures. Proteins 1996, 26, 363-376.
20. Word, J. M.; Lovell, S. C.; Richardson, J. S.; Richardson, D. C. Asparagine and glutamine: Using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1735-1747.
21. Claussen, H.; Buning, C.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. FlexE: Efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 308, 377-395.
22. Jiang, F.; Kim, S. H. "Soft docking": Matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 219, 79-102.
23. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G. M.; Rejto, P. A.; Sherman, C. J.; Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: Conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 317-324.
24. Velec, H. F.; Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6296-6303.
25. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
26. Breitenlechner, C. B.; Friebe, W. G.; Brunet, E.; Werner, G.; Graul, K.; Thomas, U.; Kunkele, K. P.; Schafer, W.; Gassel, M.; Bossemeyer, D.; Huber, R.; Engh, R. A.; Masjost, B. Design and crystal structures of protein kinase B-selective inhibitors in complex with protein kinase A and mutants. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 163-170.
27. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
28. Vriend, G.; Sander, C. Detection of common three-dimensional substructures in proteins. Proteins 1991, 11, 52-58.
29. Krieger, E.; Darden, T.; Nabuurs, S. B.; Finkelstein, A.; Vriend, G. Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: Force-field parameterization in crystal space. Proteins 2004, 57, 678-683.
30. Essman, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Phys. Chem. B 1995, 103, 8577-8593.
31. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3D atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 537-547.
32. Eddy, S. R. Where did the BLOSUM62 alignment score matrix come from. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 1035-1036.
33. Oda, A.; Tsuchida, K.; Takakura, T.; Yamaotsu, N.; Hirono, S. Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexes. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 380-391.
34. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. Proteins 1999, 37, 228-241.
35. Bledsoe, R. K.; Madauss, K. P.; Holt, J. A.; Apolito, C. J.; Lambert, M. H.; Pearce, K. H.; Stanley, T. B.; Stewart, E. L.; Trump, R. P.; Willson, T. M.; Williams, S. P. A ligand-mediated hydrogen bond network required for the activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 31283-31293.
36. Fagart, J.; Huyet, J.; Pinon, G. M.; Rochel, M.; Mayer, C.; Rafestin-Oblin, M. E. Crystal structure of a mutant mineralocorticoid receptor responsible for hypertension. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 554-555.
37. Li, Y.; Suino, K.; Daugherty, J.; Xu, H. E. Structural and biochemical mechanisms for the specificity of hormone binding and coactivator assembly by mineralocorticoid receptor. Mol. Cell 2005, 19, 367-380.
38. Breitenlechner, C. B.; Wegge, T.; Berillon, L.; Graul, K.; Marzenell, K.; Friebe, W. G.; Thomas, U.; Schumacher, R.; Huber, R.; Engh, R. A.; Masjost, B. Structure-based optimization of novel azepane derivatives as PKB inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1375-1390.
39. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. CASP2 experiences with docking flexible ligands using FlexX. Proteins 1997, Suppl 1, 221-225.
40. Furnham, N.; Blundell, T. L.; DePristo, M. A.; Terwilliger, T. C. Is one solution good enough. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 184-185.
41. Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 209-225.
42. Huang, S. Y.; Zou, X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins 2007, 66, 399-421.
43. Schnecke, V.; Swanson, C. A.; Getzoff, E. D.; Tainer, J. A.; Kuhn, L. A. Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side-chain flexibility. Proteins 1998, 33, 74-87.
44. Zavodszky, M. I.; Kuhn, L. A. Side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand binding: The minimal rotation hypothesis. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1104-1114.
45. Lovell, S. C.; Word, J. M.; Richardson, J. S.; Richardson, D. C. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 2000, 40, 389-408.
46. Polgar, T.; Keseru, G. M. Ensemble docking into flexible active sites. Critical evaluation of FlexE against JNK-3 and beta-secretase. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1795-1805.
47. Best, R. B.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; DePristo, M. A.; Vendruscolo, M. Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 10901-10906.
48. Kovacs, J. A.; Chacon, P.; Abagyan, R. Predictions of protein flexibility: First-order measures. Proteins 2004, 56, 661-668.
49. Garzon, J. I.; Kovacs, J.; Abagyan, R.; Chacon, P. DFprot: A webtool for predicting local chain deformability. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 901-902.
50. Landau, M.; Mayrose, I.; Rosenberg, Y.; Glaser, F.; Martz, E.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2005: The projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W299-W302.
51. Glaser, F.; Rosenberg, Y.; Kessel, A.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. The ConSurf-HSSP database: the mapping of evolutionary conservation among homologs onto PDB structures. Proteins 2005, 58, 610-617.
52. Gunasekaran, K.; Nussinov, R. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 257-273.
53. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-741.
54. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T. The particle concept: Placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions. Proteins 1999, 34, 17-28.
55. Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R. Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6504-6515.