Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 2287-2303

  Wang, Renxiao ^a   Lu, Yipin ^a   Wang, Shaomeng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMSCORE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATION; D SCORE; DRUGSCORE; EVALUATION; F SCORE; G SCORE; LIGSCORE; LUDI SCORE; PLP SCORE; PMF SCORE; RATING SCALE; X SCORE;

ALGORITHMS; CHLORAMPHENICOL; CHLORAMPHENICOL O-ACETYLTRANSFERASE; DIIODOTHYRONINES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PREALBUMIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037763817     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm0203783     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ewing, T. J. A.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
2. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
3. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
4. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
5. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
6. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G. M.; Rejto, P. A.; Sherman, C. J.; Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 Protease: Conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 317-324.
7. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Bouzida, D.; Rejto, P. A. In Rational Drug Design: Novel Methodology and Practical Applications; Parrill, L., Reddy, M. R., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1999; pp 292-311.
8. Böhm, H. J. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 243-256.
9. Böhm, H. J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the polarization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 309-323.
10. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Lai, L. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex. J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4, 379-394.
11. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16(2), 11-26.
12. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791-804.
13. Muegge, I. A knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: Probing the reference state. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 20, 99-114.
14. Muegge, I. Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 418-425.
15. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
16. Ishchenko, A. V.; Shakhnovich, E. I. Small molecule growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2770-2780.
17. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
18. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
19. Terp, G. E.; Johansen, B. N.; Christensen, I. T.; Jorgensen, F. S. A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2333-2343.
20. Paul, N.; Rognan, D. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2002, 47, 521-533.
21. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, I. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242. http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/.
22. SYBYL, version 6.8; Tripos Inc.; http://www.tripos.com/.
23. Cerius2, version 4.6; Accelrys Inc.; http://www.accelrys.com/.
24. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
25. Clark, R. D.; Strizhev, A.; Leonard, J. M.; Blake, J. F.; Matthew, J. B. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 281-295.
26. Wang, R.; Wang, S. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1422-1426.
27. Lane, D. M. HyperStat Online Textbook; http://davidmlane.com/ hyperstat/index.html.
28. Gruebele, M. Protein folding: The free energy surface. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 161-168 and the references therein.
29. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein-ligand docking predictions. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1999, 4, 17-28.
30. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765-784.